![]() |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 1851485)
Are you a journalist?
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 1851485)
Are you a journalist?
|
Originally Posted by FaceBiter
(Post 1850623)
Mesa. CNN is going crazy right now. Imagine if they knew about their hiring practices.
|
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851475)
I am not a pilot, nor do I work for an airline, but I am trying to get reliable information from a reliable source on this issue.
What level of medical confidentiality would everyone here be comfortable with, particularly concerning psychological issues? From what I have heard, a pilot who took the prudent action of seeking psychological counsel when they have difficulty dealing with some issue in their life, could be facing serious and possibly permanent career problems. Is this something that creates a barrier to those who might otherwise benefit from such counsel? What are the present rules for airline pilots? Is it limited to general HIPPA confidentiality laws? If someone is diagnosed with something that might impinge on their ability to work by a private doctor, is there a law that would require the doctor to inform the company flight surgeon? If not, should there be? |
Originally Posted by aviatorhi
(Post 1851055)
Since your IQ is below 12 let me explain it to you...
One man make many plane go bye bye. |
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 1851567)
Sorry, nobody is going to do your work for you. I will, however, provide expert consultation for $1400 per hour and will reliably answer your questions. A few others here have similar policy. 10 hour increments only, payment in advance.
Go away CNNer- you going to test amtrak/taxi operators as well? This was an outlier of outliers. The "news" has to start thinking with I/E.:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851475)
I am not a pilot, nor do I work for an airline, but I am trying to get reliable information from a reliable source on this issue.
derp derp derrrrrrrrrrrrrrpty derp derp Typical media ****stick. "Confidential sources say.....hack hack hack" You do know the only "people" slithering around below you are terrorists who actually kill innocent people, right? I would cite child molesters as well, but you media scumbags even do that, too. What part of the phrase "exceedingly rare" or "outlier of outliers" causes you to believe an entire industry should be forced to tapdance to YOUR industry's hysteria and fear-mongering?? Don't bother answering that. It's a rhetorical question for a media hack who thinks he/she can legitimately troll an anonymous forum for a "reliable source". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5MO73ftdpA |
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 1851567)
Sorry, nobody is going to do your work for you. I will, however, provide expert consultation for $1400 per hour and will reliably answer your questions. A few others here have similar policy. 10 hour increments only, payment in advance.
|
No. I am just someone who has had an interest in aviation and am asking a few questions of those who likely to provide the most incisive and knowledgeable answers. But so what if I was?
I share your opinion of the idiotic BS on CNN and I would think that some of the folks here who are equally disgusted with such a font of misinformation might take an opportunity to provide some answers that were actually authoritative. |
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851762)
No. I am just someone who has had an interest in aviation and am asking a few questions of those who likely to provide the most incisive and knowledgeable answers. But so what if I was?
I share your opinion of the idiotic BS on CNN and I would think that some of the folks here who are equally disgusted with such a font of misinformation might take an opportunity to provide some answers that were actually authoritative. |
Originally Posted by SayAlt
(Post 1851742)
Sooooooooo, you're going to turn to an anonymous internet forum for a "reliable source", eh??
derp derp derrrrrrrrrrrrrrpty derp derp Typical media ****stick. "Confidential sources say.....hack hack hack" You do know the only "people" slithering around below you are terrorists who actually kill innocent people, right? I would cite child molesters as well, but you media scumbags even do that, too. What part of the phrase "exceedingly rare" or "outlier of outliers" causes you to believe an entire industry should be forced to tapdance to YOUR industry's hysteria and fear-mongering?? Don't bother answering that. It's a rhetorical question for a media hack who thinks he/she can legitimately troll an anonymous forum for a "reliable source". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5MO73ftdpA First; how, exactly would a "media hack" get a reliable source off an anonymous board? Make up a name of, or ascribe it to someone's nickname. Second; if I was some nefarious professional reporter, why would I have admitted right off that I was not a pilot? Believe me, by not doing so and with a little "pushing", a good reporter could have gotten some really juicy "quotes". Pilots and the work they do has long been a source of admiration to me. I had always hoped that without the physical problems that made me unable to fly, I might have been able to fly. But you really need to thicken your skins a little bit. That way maybe you could provide those outside the brotherhood (or sisterhood) with a viewpoint other than paranoid defensiveness and general overall arrogance. |
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851772)
|
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 1851567)
Sorry, nobody is going to do your work for you. I will, however, provide expert consultation for $1400 per hour and will reliably answer your questions. A few others here have similar policy. 10 hour increments only, payment in advance.
|
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851772)
This is actually quite illuminating by itself. I saw nothing in the registration that required someone to be a professional pilot in order to comment or ask questions. I would suggest you contact the administrator to make your forum invite only. This way you may be able to hide what is apparently a shared and very deep, almost paranoid defensiveness from the general public.
|
Originally Posted by Delmonico
(Post 1851772)
This is actually quite illuminating by itself. I saw nothing in the registration that required someone to be a professional pilot in order to comment or ask questions. I would suggest you contact the administrator to make your forum invite only. This way you may be able to hide what is apparently a shared and very deep, almost paranoid defensiveness from the general public.
First; how, exactly would a "media hack" get a reliable source off an anonymous board? Make up a name of, or ascribe it to someone's nickname. Second; if I was some nefarious professional reporter, why would I have admitted right off that I was not a pilot? Believe me, by not doing so and with a little "pushing", a good reporter could have gotten some really juicy "quotes". Pilots and the work they do has long been a source of admiration to me. I had always hoped that without the physical problems that made me unable to fly, I might have been able to fly. But you really need to thicken your skins a little bit. That way maybe you could provide those outside the brotherhood (or sisterhood) with a viewpoint other than paranoid defensiveness and general overall arrogance. Also, if ever you are at a bar or party and want alienate a pilot, ask him/her about "that one crash a while back." Better yet, tell him why you know 9/11 was an inside job and that "chemtrails" are part of a government mind control experiment. If I had a dollar for every one of those questions, I could retire at 50. |
Originally Posted by FlyJSH
(Post 1851808)
I'll do it for half as much as long as I get to use a shiny, new pen! :D
Make sure he throws in a newspaper too. |
All questions the public wants to know the answers to can be found in that readers digest article. What was that called? 50 secrets your pilot won't tell you? Yea that one, all the answers to this crash are in there.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1850811)
Lets face it.......pilots in general. :rolleyes:
Few professions are infected with such a wide range of personality disorders, neurosis, psychosis, paranoia, hysteria, extremism (political, social) and general oddness as airline pilots. If detailed psych exams ever become mandatory, I expect the pilot shortage to blossom. Not only will many present pilots be found "questionable" and therefore in jeopardy in what surely would be a poorly thought out vetting process like OSA, but it will keep many who would be found acceptable away as it's simply one more undesirable hassle to add to the already long list of why this profession isn't worth it. I've been flying for majors since 1979 and without a doubt, airline pilots are the most centered, calm, rational and very intelligent group I've been exposed to. My 3 day physical in 1983 was done at the Mayo Clinic and the entire last day was devoted to psychological testing, profiling and sessions with shrinks. Most all the majors were/are the same. I think the pilots of major airlines have the smallest percentage of problematic people than ANY other profession. Bar none. Just can't imagine what professional experiences of yours could have led you to such a post. Carl |
I'm thinking when you "grow your own" like LH does, you may want to watch out for inbreeding. The guy seemed to have some special handling and no shortage of cash.
|
As I understand it, the psychiatric profession has a higher incidence of suicide that almost any other. Hmmm...
Anyway, (shameless plug alert!) watch for my soon-to-be-published fact-filled (well, facts based on hazy memories, rumor, innuendo, and totally made up fantasies) research paper: "Aberrant Personalities in Airline Cockpits." Those who wish to be omitted from this fine exposé may submit a suitable editing fee, payable in gold bullion only, any time prior to publication. You know who you are... |
Originally Posted by Dr Pepper
(Post 1851745)
Is that the reason we are stuck listening to Richard Quest constantly, the real pilots want to much money? His theories about a possible medical emergency were border line retarded.
|
In my mind, Les Abend is the best one interviewed so far. Next are the former NTSB and FBI guys. The hosts, moderators, anchors, whatever you call 'em, seem way too occupied with hearing their own chatter and fawning over the pontifications of so-called experts like Quest and Schiavo instead of listening to real professionals like Abend. He, and others like him, have worked in the commercial aviation system for many years, have current real-world knowledge and experience in how it works (often in the same model of aircraft involved), and could make truly insightful comments if allowed. I guess they're not colorful enough. Back to the entertainers, folks, right after this...
Quest is a bit too bombastic and dogmatic for my taste, and I don't really think he's the aviation "expert" he purports to be. Maybe it's just the way he comes across. Schiavo's credentials look good on paper, but some of things she says makes me wonder just how deep her aviation knowledge goes. I've never been impressed with her. I think she may be there more to keep the PC police happy and less to add anything useful to the conversation. Another gripe I have with the "news" coverage is their mindless giving away of entirely too much information that should remain need-to-know. The exact details on how the cockpit security door works (with pictures!) is a blatant example. I'm almost surprised they didn't give out the door codes as well. Unfortunately, all the networks are pretty much the same on this score. A little news, a lot of bloviating, go to commercial, repeat. Ad nauseam. Please submit 2¢ for this totally unbiased appraisal. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1850811)
Lets face it.......pilots in general. :rolleyes:
Few professions are infected with such a wide range of personality disorders, neurosis, psychosis, paranoia, hysteria, extremism (political, social) and general oddness as airline pilots. If detailed psych exams ever become mandatory, I expect the pilot shortage to blossom. Not only will many present pilots be found "questionable" and therefore in jeopardy in what surely would be a poorly thought out vetting process like OSA, but it will keep many who would be found acceptable away as it's simply one more undesirable hassle to add to the already long list of why this profession isn't worth it. You're wrong on the point of "disorders". You may be mistaking eccentricity for pathology. Since pilots don't spend 50 hours/week in a building full of white-collar people with hierarchies and agendas they're not routinely "caged" on a daily basis by saturation in the establishment. They're free to form their own belief systems based on whatever wingnut websites they may like to frequent. Generally harmless but they sure can make you think "What The...??" Many of them remind me of truck drivers I know...plenty of access to info, but no real discrimination as to the quality of the info. This mainly applies to civilian-track pilots who've never done anything else but fly. Military and civilian career-changers have worked in organizations and typically have their gyros caged. |
Originally Posted by av8rdude
(Post 1851892)
As I understand it, the psychiatric profession has a higher incidence of suicide that almost any other. Hmmm...
|
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
(Post 1851896)
Sad thing is that Richard Quest was one of the better guests. He was the only one to realize that this was an extreme outlier and that any kneejerk reaction would do nothing to enhance safety. So tired of the entire CNN lineup though- one stupid question/comment after another without a clue.:rolleyes:
2008_04_quest2.jpgSo, CNN personality Richard Quest was arrested early Friday morning for drug possession when police found in Central Park well after the park's 1 a.m. curfew. Sure, the initial reports said Quest told police he was carrying methamphetamime in his pocket, but leave it to the NY Post to add the really detailed details. Not only did Quest have drugs, he also had a "rope around his neck that was tied to his genitals, and a sex toy in his boot." That was so not in the NY Times' account. The Post also reported, "It wasn't immediately clear what the rope was for" and that "the officer at the scene was able to ID the drug because of 'his prior experience as a police officer in drug arrests, observation of packaging which is characteristic of this type of drug, and defendant's statements that... "I've got some meth in my pocket."'" Ha! Quest, who was in jail most of yesterday, was charged with loitering and drug possession (but not lewdness because he wasn't exposed). His lawyer claimed Quest was "returning to his hotel with friends" and had no idea there was a curfew for the park. Quest will attend six months of drug counseling and if he stays out of trouble, the charges will be dismissed and his case sealed. |
Originally Posted by jungle
(Post 1852019)
Sure, Cooper and Dick Quest are just chock full of good ideas.
2008_04_quest2.jpgSo, CNN personality Richard Quest was arrested early Friday morning for drug possession when police found in Central Park well after the park's 1 a.m. curfew. Sure, the initial reports said Quest told police he was carrying methamphetamime in his pocket, but leave it to the NY Post to add the really detailed details. Not only did Quest have drugs, he also had a "rope around his neck that was tied to his genitals, and a sex toy in his boot." That was so not in the NY Times' account. The Post also reported, "It wasn't immediately clear what the rope was for" and that "the officer at the scene was able to ID the drug because of 'his prior experience as a police officer in drug arrests, observation of packaging which is characteristic of this type of drug, and defendant's statements that... "I've got some meth in my pocket."'" Ha! Quest, who was in jail most of yesterday, was charged with loitering and drug possession (but not lewdness because he wasn't exposed). His lawyer claimed Quest was "returning to his hotel with friends" and had no idea there was a curfew for the park. Quest will attend six months of drug counseling and if he stays out of trouble, the charges will be dismissed and his case sealed. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands