Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
FAA's drone regulations >

FAA's drone regulations

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

FAA's drone regulations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2016 | 05:57 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: JAFO- First Observer
Default

It has been determined by the FAA that a UAS is an "aircraft" and thus operating a UAS is subject to regulation. 14 CFR Part 107 is in the works. Currently there are existing rules that apply:

Public Law PL 112-95 and 14 CFR 91.13.

The offending pilot was operating under a "P.L. 112-95; Section 333 Exemption" which is commercial use of a UAS. The exemption required that he hold a Private Pilot Certificate.
Reply
Old 06-13-2016 | 06:36 AM
  #42  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 692
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Until and unless they totally carve out airspace to segregate UAS from manned aircraft, then UAS should be considered to be aircraft.

Formal training and a license should be required, although it would need not be the same training real pilots get. The main point being the knowledge to not endanger real airplanes (the kind with people on board), and a means for the FAA to track and hold accountable reckless behavior.
Reply
Old 06-13-2016 | 12:28 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: C-172 PPL
Default Unintended Consequences?

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Until and unless they totally carve out airspace to segregate UAS from manned aircraft, then UAS should be considered to be aircraft.

Formal training and a license should be required, although it would need not be the same training real pilots get. ...
I am concerned that an unintended consequence of formal training and licensing of drones would be that serious, real pilots would avoid drones. Who would want to fly a drone and in doing so, endanger their commercial license? The Commercial License is much more important and valuable, so few pilots would put their license at risk while flying small scale commercial drones.

The result would be that lots of drones would be flown by less skilled amateurs.

While I don't disagree with the idea of training and licensing for drone pilots, I think it should also be "firewalled" from traditional pilot cerificates. Enforcement action because of a drone-incident should have no bearing on your rights as a commercial pilot.
Reply
Old 06-13-2016 | 11:30 PM
  #44  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 692
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by abelenky
I am concerned that an unintended consequence of formal training and licensing of drones would be that serious, real pilots would avoid drones. Who would want to fly a drone and in doing so, endanger their commercial license? The Commercial License is much more important and valuable, so few pilots would put their license at risk while flying small scale commercial drones.

The result would be that lots of drones would be flown by less skilled amateurs.

While I don't disagree with the idea of training and licensing for drone pilots, I think it should also be "firewalled" from traditional pilot cerificates. Enforcement action because of a drone-incident should have no bearing on your rights as a commercial pilot.
Yes. They should get their own certs and training. Real pilots already avoid drones, and real pilot training doesn't automatically translate to drone ops anyway. I think the licensing would...

1) Ensure they have the knowledge/skills to stay out of trouble.
2) Enable the feds to nail unlicensed operators.

Drones are coming, but no need to just give up on controlled airspace. The drone crowd generally trivializes the rules (the ones they're even aware of), but that can be fixed systemically and the cowboys booted out of the NAS.

Or we can wait till we have a few fatal midairs. Or maybe just one big fatal midair.

I doubt the feds would go for a certificate firewall though, they like to throw the entire book at you whenever the opportunity arises.
Reply
Old 06-16-2016 | 04:30 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: lapsed medical
Default

Except for drones less than 7.5 ounces (approximately) I'm all for a knowledge test for drone operators. This is similar to what ham radio operators have to do. Passing the knowledge test would be prerequisite for drone operator license, which you should need in order to purchase or fly a drone. I was sure I heard that drones over 7.5 ounces (approximately) now had to be serial numbered and registered, which should mean that the Feds should be able to nail any misbehaving drone operators.

https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=85264
Reply
Old 06-21-2016 | 05:04 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

New FAA commercial drone rules require ?pilot certificate? | Ars Technica

https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ulations-obama

Last edited by iceman49; 06-21-2016 at 05:21 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tweetdrvr
Military
7
06-28-2014 09:21 AM
tom11011
Major
1
06-21-2014 01:48 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
Buschpilot
Regional
3
10-27-2010 07:02 AM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices