Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Singapore 368 Turnback, Catches Fire >

Singapore 368 Turnback, Catches Fire

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Singapore 368 Turnback, Catches Fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2016, 03:33 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
my guess is the pilots did not know the right wing was on fire... cannot see it from the cockpit... and none of the inflight crew picked up the intercom. I'm very surprised the tower and/or another aircraft did not call a fire on the right wing... which should have led to an immediate EVAC.
Open the window and stick your head out. Walk back to the cabin...lots of ways. Many 777-300's have an exterior camera system....Fires that have started exactly like this in the past have resulted in major loss of life.

Of course, I wasn't there, and don't know all the circumstances, but I'll take some injuries over loss of life any day.

The evac's with higher injury rates are many times unplanned evac's. They had 2 hours to plan and prepare.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 06-27-2016, 04:15 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

was this an engine issue with low or no oil?

Was the engine shut down in flight, or was it kept running?
baseball is offline  
Old 06-27-2016, 05:40 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
Open the window and stick your head out. Walk back to the cabin...lots of ways. Many 777-300's have an exterior camera system....Fires that have started exactly like this in the past have resulted in major loss of life.

Of course, I wasn't there, and don't know all the circumstances, but I'll take some injuries over loss of life any day.

The evac's with higher injury rates are many times unplanned evac's. They had 2 hours to plan and prepare.
You are making decisions hindsight. They had an oil problem on a motor (so we are told). Why would they be preparing for evacuation?

Did they (cockpit crew) know they had a fire? Would you be opening the window after landing for an oil problem? "Captain, we need to open the window and check for fire", said nobody ever.

Personally, I am of the school of thought that delaying the evacuation probably prevented injury or saved lives -- assuming it was done on purpose. The delay may have been caused by incompetence or ignorance of what was happening.

Here we have another 777 engulfed in flames around the engine area after an engine issue. It will be interesting to see what the investigation reveals.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 06-27-2016, 07:09 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Used2BeFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Retired
Posts: 94
Default

Just a thought ... the starboard wing is on fire, so evacuate on the port side. But ... the fuel from the starboard wing tank escapes and runs, burning, under the aircraft. So you evacuate into a wall of flame just where the slides touch the tarmac.

Keep the pax seated and wait for the ARFF.
Used2BeFlyer is offline  
Old 06-27-2016, 08:43 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,231
Default

Keep the pax seated and wait for the ARFF.
What? Wait.. for how long? with the wing engulfed in flame?
I'm getting out.

I'll give them the only benefit of doubt, they somehow did not know it was burning.
In that case the cabin crew has some major faults in their procedures if they cannot pick up the interphone and inform the cockpit of impending doom.
trip is offline  
Old 06-28-2016, 08:54 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
Open the window and stick your head out. Walk back to the cabin...lots of ways. Many 777-300's have an exterior camera system....Fires that have started exactly like this in the past have resulted in major loss of life.

Of course, I wasn't there, and don't know all the circumstances, but I'll take some injuries over loss of life any day.

The evac's with higher injury rates are many times unplanned evac's. They had 2 hours to plan and prepare.
Just as side note for future ref, no cockpit windows on 787. Doubt A 350 has them either.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 06-28-2016, 06:38 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11 View Post
Just as side note for future ref, no cockpit windows on 787. Doubt A 350 has them either.
Yeah, I hear that sucks when you don't have air. The 747 windows don't open either, but the 777's do. And the classic, ask the tower, "Are we on fire?" Use all your tools.

As far as 777's engines engulfed in flames, yes, British Airlways in LAS, recently.

SE landing?? Yes, prep the cabin for exactly this eventuality. If you are a UAL person, we have the TEST acronym with the F/A's. In the PC, "We anticipate a normal landing, but..."

I can promise you that this incident will be use for the next couple of years in EVAC class. Would you or wouldn't you?
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 06-30-2016, 07:25 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
SE landing?? Yes, prep the cabin for exactly this eventuality. If you are a UAL person, we have the TEST acronym with the F/A's. In the PC, "We anticipate a normal landing, but..."
What does the TEST acronym stand for?
threeighteen is offline  
Old 06-30-2016, 07:33 PM
  #19  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Type of Emergency

Evac or Not

Special Instructions

Time remaining
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-07-2016, 07:14 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sourdough44's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Left
Posts: 636
Default

Just some questions? I'm thinking a very suitable alternate was likely closer to the point of time when they had the 'degraded engine'? It sounds like they flew a good while after the problem with the engine was evident?

Was the engine shut down and cold during landing? Fuel dumping secured? They have nice long runways in Singapore, once they ended up there.
sourdough44 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
53x11
Safety
3
03-17-2016 08:11 PM
iceman49
Safety
2
07-01-2014 07:02 PM
RealityCheck
Safety
70
08-18-2013 04:04 PM
11Fan
Safety
46
10-05-2012 04:20 PM
J Dawg
Cargo
28
07-01-2008 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices