Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
GoJet CR7 engine failure out of JFK-RDU >

GoJet CR7 engine failure out of JFK-RDU

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

GoJet CR7 engine failure out of JFK-RDU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2016 | 04:09 PM
  #1  
AV8AJET's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default GoJet CR7 engine failure out of JFK-RDU

https://youtu.be/kgIcO8Rzhuw
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
AV8AJET's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

On October 7th, 2016 shortly after 9PM EST, GoJet flight 4250 (Operating as Delta Connection) enroute from John F. Kennedy International Airport to Raleigh-Durham International Airport reported that their right engine had failed, and requested an immediate return to JFK. Flight 4250 landed safely at JFK at 9:35PM.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 326
Default

Why didn't they declare?
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 05:28 PM
  #4  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Why didn't they declare?
They did.

I thought it was strange that Approach asked for number of souls and fuel on board in POUNDS.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 05:32 PM
  #5  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Why didn't they declare?
They did... And usually when you tell ATC you have an engine failure the emergency is implied and they will declare for you.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 07:31 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Downward Dog
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
They did.

I thought it was strange that Approach asked for number of souls and fuel on board in POUNDS.
? They want your fuel quantity, not the duration of fuel on board.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 07:47 PM
  #7  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 6
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
? They want your fuel quantity, not the duration of fuel on board.
Until you hit the enroute phase, it's all about how big the fireball can be. When enroute and declaring it becomes, how long can they hang out and what could remain when they land. Sob's don't change. Worst case scenario thinking. Just after departure it's the thought of lots of gas, just like safety announcements. Before takeoff- all phones off, after landing- use your phones.

Why? Gas is burned off vs being loaded up to possibly burn. Centers ask for fuel in minutes, departure will ask for fuel in pounds, since the timeframe has now changed as you declare.

Yes, not PC, but think it through. Nobody wants to declare, but if you do it becomes a thought process of "worst case".
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 08:14 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Interesting choice on the non-precision. Lots of airports in the area offering something better. Looks like no harm no foul though.

Nice job.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 09:27 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Default

Obviously it's easy to Monday morning quarterback when you're not in the moment. However, I think there might have been some lack of situational awareness or confusion on the approach. Sounded like he wasn't set up for or thought he was getting a different approach when he questioned where the vectors were going to take him. While the VOR 13L/R into JFK sets you up for the longest runways, it requires more hand flying and low altitude maneuvers while dealing with this emergency at night. By no means am I implying it's something all ATP rated pilots cannot successfully complete, but you might as well make it as easy as possible for yourself in an emergency situation. Regardless, nice work to the crew for getting it on the ground safely.
Reply
Old 10-08-2016 | 10:59 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: 145
Default

I agree it was an odd choice of approach. I don't know why they didn't ask for the ils 13L. Although they almost never use that approach world, i think they would give that in a case of emergency.

Bottom line: these guys didn't end up in the news. They got everyone back on the ground safely. Good job to those pilots.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elliott85
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-30-2007 04:22 PM
Puckhead
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-02-2007 07:55 PM
CRJflyer32
Regional
51
01-28-2007 07:00 PM
Jakob
Hangar Talk
5
01-13-2007 09:21 AM
HSLD
Your Photos and Videos
6
11-05-2006 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices