Quote:
Originally Posted by Excargodog
I would point out that the largest single source of UPT candidates remains the Air Force Academy, and most people go there through appointment by some Senator or Congressman who oftentimes takes a proprietary interest in ‘his’ or ‘hers’ recent graduate’s continued success.
So you're saying the failings of the USAF are due to all those utterly incompetent zoo grads who get forced through UPT by congressional intervention?
BS.
Likely true back in 1870, but the large majority of congress people today simply make a list of ten applicants (in no particular order) based on qualifications (at least the academy min admission criteria), and then let the academies pick from those ten. Perhaps surprisingly, most modern congress people find the original patrician system distasteful, so they just kick the ball back to the admissions office. If you somehow have acquired some outrageous notoriety or social media presence at age 17, then yeah they probably exercise their veto power. In any event, the service academies can and will reject congressional appointees who don't meet their standards.
Then there are numerous appointments set aside for enlisted folks.
And I can guarantee you that no congress critter ever intervenes in military training for random cats they don't even remember appointing in the first place. Now if they're on the armed services committee, and if it's their own kid, or some kind of political football (ie Kara), they might follow up. But that's exceptionally rare.
Also think about this... if you took that away from congress and just had the admissions offices do it, that sounds fair right? Weeeellll.... now you have a component of the executive branch hand-picking the future core cadre of the officer corps. They could apply some political criteria to that, and you end up with a military which is asynchronous with the citizens. Maybe best to just leave it with the elected reps. There was a reason for that in the first place.