Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Usaf pilots hedged their bets... >

Usaf pilots hedged their bets...

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Usaf pilots hedged their bets...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2021 | 03:03 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The AD needs to be the AD. The reserves are surge capacity for contingencies, not a replacement for costly AD force structure (which needs to much more responsive than guard/reserves).
Somehow I don't think that the senior brass will ever grow a big enough pair to tell Congress that we can't/shouldn't 'do more with less,' so I doubt this paradigm shift (back to the way things used to be) will ever occur
Reply
Old 05-05-2021 | 03:56 PM
  #12  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Don’t get me wrong, abuse of the USERRA does occur, and both the military and the airlines need to be able to stomp on it when it happens. But after accepting Billions in PSP, the airlines would be ill-advised to get churlish about supporting the legitimate requirements of Joe average reservist.
That was pre-covid, they'll probably lay off hassling the reservists for a good while now as you say.

But if the mil tried to implement a hybrid solution (Navy seriously considered this) where some reserves would be planned (obligated?) for a much higher participation than traditional, I doubt the airlines would see the humor in more of their pilots being gone for more time. I was a heavy traditional participant, any more and I would have needed to be chasing the AD 20 year pension. It's not a seamless sliding scale, there's a tipping point where people want the regular pension and behave accordingly. Or if it's not available, they'll behave accordingly, like TRs.
Reply
Old 05-06-2021 | 03:14 AM
  #13  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The AD needs to be the AD. The reserves are surge capacity for contingencies, not a replacement for costly AD force structure (which needs to much more responsive than guard/reserves).
It's just that the "surge" is 20 years and counting lol. They've done a great job of slowly turning us into the AD and they even keep sending us their LTs because they can't train them.
Reply
Old 05-06-2021 | 03:56 AM
  #14  
C-17 Driver's Avatar
Abused Spouse of PBS
Veteran: Air Force
15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 6
From: 756 CA
Default

I was active duty for 10 years until 2006 and have been in the AF Reserve since. What is old is new again. When President Trump closed down the country last year due to Covid, I bet there was some gumshoe at the Pentagon that woke up smiling thinking that the pilot retention problem was fixed. I would not be surprised if some short-sighted folks looked to even eradicate the pilot bonus. Obviously, the retention issue was not fixed, and the can was kicked down the road.

An earlier comment on this thread suggested passing more flying to the Guard/Reserve unit. I can only speak from the position as a TR in an associate wing flying T-Tails. There should never be an assumption that we will just plus our participation up. Family first, civilian job second, Reserve job is third.

I've said it for years. Until I see all the offices on the Active Duty side emptied out, then the Active Duty can still support the mission. Millions of dollars were spent to generate a pilot, not an exec officer.
Reply
Old 05-06-2021 | 09:19 AM
  #15  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 90
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
I was active duty for 10 years until 2006 and have been in the AF Reserve since. What is old is new again. When President Trump closed down the country last year due to Covid, I bet there was some gumshoe at the Pentagon that woke up smiling thinking that the pilot retention problem was fixed. I would not be surprised if some short-sighted folks looked to even eradicate the pilot bonus. Obviously, the retention issue was not fixed, and the can was kicked down the road.

An earlier comment on this thread suggested passing more flying to the Guard/Reserve unit. I can only speak from the position as a TR in an associate wing flying T-Tails. There should never be an assumption that we will just plus our participation up. Family first, civilian job second, Reserve job is third.

I've said it for years. Until I see all the offices on the Active Duty side emptied out, then the Active Duty can still support the mission. Millions of dollars were spent to generate a pilot, not an exec officer.
As a retired active duty guy…I 100% agree. The active duty wastes a lot of valuable Human Resources. There really is no good reason for tying up young captains as squadron execs when they are in their most productive flying years (for the Air Force). Professional development of officer skills does not require burning guys out on office work generating awards packages for awards that have no reason for being. The Air Force bureaucracy has become a giant self licking ice cream cone. That said, Congress and the administration need to resource the active duty to meet the normal day to day ops load. Guard and Reserve are for going to war with a near peer competitor, not mowing the sand in the desert.
Reply
Old 05-07-2021 | 05:02 AM
  #16  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
When President Trump closed down the country last year due to Covid, I bet there was some gumshoe at the Pentagon that woke up smiling thinking that the pilot retention problem was fixed. I would not be surprised if some short-sighted folks looked to even eradicate the pilot bonus. Obviously, the retention issue was not fixed, and the can was kicked down the road.
You know it! There was even a General, and a few others, on a FB page condescendingly boasting that the airlines won't be hiring "for a long time." This was in a post that happened before this years bonus was released. The type of post that reeked of, I know the bonus that's coming is not going to be well received, but you shouldn't be in this job for the bonus anyway, oh and the airlines won't be hiring for a long time.


Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
There should never be an assumption that we will just plus our participation up. Family first, civilian job second, Reserve job is third.
This! That's almost verbatim words passed to me by my first flight commander. It's something I pass on to our young guys as well. I know it's hard for AD guys to fathom, but we're burnt out as well. The constant deployments are wearing on the force.
Reply
Old 05-07-2021 | 08:04 AM
  #17  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
An earlier comment on this thread suggested passing more flying to the Guard/Reserve unit. I can only speak from the position as a TR in an associate wing flying T-Tails. There should never be an assumption that we will just plus our participation up. Family first, civilian job second, Reserve job is third.
Taking Reservists fir granted is not a new problem, unfortunately:

https://youtu.be/bJaSIUCPZKc
Reply
Old 05-07-2021 | 08:55 AM
  #18  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Taking Reservists fir granted is not a new problem, unfortunately:

https://youtu.be/bJaSIUCPZKc

https://youtu.be/5vAwktNw7_8
Reply
Old 05-08-2021 | 08:13 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Default

My best friend from college was an AF IP. A couple years ago he told me it was a massive uphill battle to wash anybody out of UPT. Then they basically cut the hours in half and tried adding a bunch of VR-type training that'd track their instrument scan, etc. That stuff definitely helps, but it's not anywhere close to a 1 for 1 replacement for the SA, airmanship, and ADM from real-world experience.
Reply
Old 05-08-2021 | 08:40 AM
  #20  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman
My best friend from college was an AF IP. A couple years ago he told me it was a massive uphill battle to wash anybody out of UPT. Then they basically cut the hours in half and tried adding a bunch of VR-type training that'd track their instrument scan, etc. That stuff definitely helps, but it's not anywhere close to a 1 for 1 replacement for the SA, airmanship, and ADM from real-world experience.
it’s a program they are looking into:

https://www.airforcemag.com/usaf-bri...al-curriculum/

As far as “...a massive uphill battle to wash anybody out of UPT...” I would point out that the largest single source of UPT candidates remains the Air Force Academy, and most people go there through appointment by some Senator or Congressman who oftentimes takes a proprietary interest in ‘his’ or ‘hers’ recent graduate’s continued success.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whalesurfer
Cargo
7
12-03-2019 10:45 AM
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 03:59 PM
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices