Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Usaf pilots hedged their bets... >

Usaf pilots hedged their bets...

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Usaf pilots hedged their bets...

Old 04-19-2021, 09:33 AM
  #1  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default Usaf pilots hedged their bets...

The USAF’s Bad Bets on Pilot Retention Show It Needs Outside Help

Service leaders think the same old tactics can reverse a pilot shortage in a resurging economy.

BRIAN KRUCHKOW and TOBIAS SWITZER
|
APRIL 19, 2021 08:00 AM ET

https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/202...e-help/173431/
Excargodog is offline  
Old 04-19-2021, 09:49 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

AF guesses wrong on retention? I think we've seen this movie a couple times already.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-19-2021, 11:16 AM
  #3  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,636
Default

The reality is that military service will never be able to compete for pilots over the long term. Military flying is more challenging and fulfilling, but it requires a degree of dedication (especially of a pilot’s time)that is unsustainable for those who highly value family time or financial rewards. The USAF should operate on the assumption that they will lose close to 60% of pilots at the end of their UPT commitment. It will drive a higher annual production rate and a different career progression model.
tnkrdrvr is offline  
Old 04-19-2021, 03:44 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 43
Default

Yuuup, same story each year. AF has a two main problems with retention: QoL and Pay.

QoL: They spend 10 years wringing an aircrew member to the bone. Don't get me wrong its an absolutely awesome job but 12-13 hr days wear on you and the family. Sprinkle in your mandatory downrange deployments to be the snacko or something else equally useless and you have a recipe for people who just need a change of pace. To the AF's credit they have taken some of the unnecessary additional duties off our shoulders but that's a band aid on a bullet wound. AF is in a death spiral of rated officer manning. We have 6 guys doing the job of 10 people. One of the guys gets fed up and punches out....now you've got 5. AFPC puts a 6th person back in but everyone keeps getting more jaded.
It all comes down to our military end strength that gets assigned by congress. We can't keep asking our people to do more with less. Either reduce the requirements for our military force or give us more people & funding. Can't have it both ways.

Pay: There IS a dollar amount that will keep pilots in, the AF just doesn't want to pay it. Nor do I blame them. It'd be a lot. Plenty of studies have been done on this, but it's the same answer the AF doesn't want to hear.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2415.html
DoD need to pay dudes more to keep them in and it needs to keep pace with inflation. Neither of these will happen, so the military will keep going from economic downturn to downturn hoping to keep people and they'll pretend they solved the issue each time.

Okay...diatribe done.
52Flyer is offline  
Old 04-19-2021, 03:45 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
AF guesses wrong on retention? I think we've seen this movie a couple times already.
Haha, truth. This movie just plays itself on repeat on AMC (the movie channel, not the mobility command)
52Flyer is offline  
Old 05-04-2021, 05:18 PM
  #6  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 1
Default

1) An unprecedented 1MIL "retention package" in bonuses and longevity/bonus pay (the NFL calls them 'contract incentives') to new FGO's in the fighter community.
2) Adopt the Navy's model of "flying tour/admin tour" to reduce the block time away from base and family. Not both at the same time.
3) Establish a re-blue process for pilots who separated within the previous 2 years (assuming they can still pass the dreaded USAF PFT), AND establish a syllabus route by which Reserve and Guardsmen who fly airlift/tanker/white jet MWS's can transfer to a fighter unit, active duty OR guard, IF that is the only commutable unit near them, or if that unit/wing/command has a specific need for pilots.

Last edited by CLTPHLYer; 05-04-2021 at 05:23 PM. Reason: Add explanatory language
CLTPHLYer is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 09:56 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default

Maybe task more flying to Guard/Reserve units.
Pilots will be able to do part time duty as well as airline flying.
Rama is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 10:12 AM
  #8  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Originally Posted by Rama View Post
Maybe task more flying to Guard/Reserve units.
Pilots will be able to do part time duty as well as airline flying.
Pribably doable for some flying. Hard to do for some types of flying requiring military working areas, supersonic areas, ACMI ranges, bombing ranges, etc. Not possible for some units requiring PRP monitoring.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 02:19 PM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Pribably doable for some flying. Hard to do for some types of flying requiring military working areas, supersonic areas, ACMI ranges, bombing ranges, etc. Not possible for some units requiring PRP monitoring.
Yes.

Also relying more heavily on guard/reserve will just further inflame industry pushback against USERRA, which was already ramped up pre-covid. At some point the industry is not going keep granting seniority numbers (and vacation, 401k, etc) to people who are more full time than part-time. They don't like doing it now, with only a relative handful in that camp.

The AD needs to be the AD. The reserves are surge capacity for contingencies, not a replacement for costly AD force structure (which needs to much more responsive than guard/reserves).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 02:48 PM
  #10  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes.

Also relying more heavily on guard/reserve will just further inflame industry pushback against USERRA, which was already ramped up pre-covid. At some point the industry is not going keep granting seniority numbers (and vacation, 401k, etc) to people who are more full time than part-time. They don't like doing it now, with only a relative handful in that camp.

The AD needs to be the AD. The reserves are surge capacity for contingencies, not a replacement for costly AD force structure (which needs to much more responsive than guard/reserves).
Don’t get me wrong, abuse of the USERRA does occur, and both the military and the airlines need to be able to stomp on it when it happens. But after accepting Billions in PSP, the airlines would be ill-advised to get churlish about supporting the legitimate requirements of Joe average reservist.
Excargodog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whalesurfer
Cargo
7
12-03-2019 10:45 AM
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 03:59 PM
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices