Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The retirements will have to exceed the legacy airlines' rates of shrinkage, consolidation and outsourcing of their work. Nobody trumpets these figures, but at most majors the seniority lists are 40% off their peak numbers. Graph it out and you'll see retirements are not replaced on a 1 to 1 basis.
With fuel price volatility (and government making it worse by adding carbon tax schemes) I'd hope for, but not count on, a hiring wave.
Bar,
Not responding to your quote in disagreement, only looking for more detailed information. I don't know the percentage, so am asking you, what amount of the "40% off their peak numbers" are due to moving from a three crewmember airplane (i.e. L-1011, 727) to a more fuel efficient two pilot cockpit?
Thanks for the reply.
Quote:
Originally Posted by own nav
Exactly. The MD80 could be the next 727. Retired in mass numbers only to be replaced by RJs.
I remember the argument 10 years ago, "the CRJ200 gets the same gas mileage per seat mile as the 727."
The 727/MD-80/CRJ200 is an apples to oranges comparison. Everything from three pilot to two pilot cockpits, CASM/RASM, and the flight schedule "convenience" that the RJ's offer the smaller communities (i.e. BIS/MOT) compared to what the airlines could offer with a 727/MD80.
Fly safe,
GJ