Quote:
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I will try to get you to stick to one point and one point only. You claimed definitively that B-717's were replacement aircraft.
...Surely, if you can state without condition that they are replacement aircraft, you have some basis for that statement, or are you just creating more random words?
This is why it's so difficult to discuss anything with you alfaromeo. Look again at what you've written above.
Now look at my actual posts on the subject:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Because these new aircraft are highly likely to be 100% replacement aircraft...
...It's nothing more than a promise to bring aboard some leased 717's and says NOTHING about whether current mainline aircraft will be reitred when the 717's arrive....
...Could be hundreds, could be none depending upon whether the company uses them as growth aircraft or replacement aircraft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
...I have no idea what aircraft the 717's will replace. It completely depends upon what management decides to do.
When did I EVER state definitively, or state without condition? I've done no such thing. I've said just the opposite. I've said it's unknowable unless you're a member of the ELT, and even they know it could change day by day.
The only thing I'm asking of you is to stop lying. It's unbecoming. You can try to rail against me for things I've never said, but it doesn't absolve you of lying. Only an apology can do that. But I guess being an MEC bureaucraft means never having to say you're sorry.
Carl
11-01-2014
