Quote:
Originally Posted by Olecal
I'm not sure if I follow your SWAG, but me thinks that your current 67% at UAL includes all 1400+ furloughs as active...
I just looked at the integrated relative list that was put out a couple years ago when the merger was announced. An april 96 hire counting ALL furloughees would be the equivalent to a CAL 98 hire in relative seniority.
Excluding the furloughees, and only counting active pilots, an April 96 hire is the same relative seniority to the 2001 CAL hires.
I don't think he used either list though, he just started at the top counting down with the method he came up with.
Remember that in the last couple years the relative seniority has changed because of new hires being put on the CAL side and not the UAL side, so whatever today's relative seniority looks like, is mostly meaningless because those UAL pilots flying at CAL aren't going to be placed at the bottom like they are now.