Quote:
Originally Posted by Hueypilot
We also lose 2 years LOS as well. That's fairly significant for some of the furloughed guys. I know it's not full LOS, but you will not see full LOS either way. 2 years at DAL+7% would help those guys far better than zero LOS and the much lower MTA rates.
Who knows what we will ultimately lose ? I find it interesting that many advocating accepting this TA use certainties when discussing the losses by doing so, but when rejection advocates like me represent certainties in the future by not accepting it, we are guessing. Besides, your beloved Mr. Parker plans to stiff those who have differed their returns for whatever reason out of LOS, so it will only be applicable to those who chose to return at the first opportunity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hueypilot
IMHO, "defending the profession" amounts to a phyrric victory. PK has a long history of not caving in to labor groups. There's no reason to think they'll start now. APA had a chance 2 years ago when the merger started in motion...they held the keys to the castle, but sold them for pennies on the dollar. *THAT* was leverage. We have very little leverage now.
Pyrrhic victory.......ah, yes......shades of a Judge Silver.
If he isn't caving now, why would expect him to cave in 2020 ?
Do you expect him to suddenly negotiate fairly then ?
Is the best strategy to COMPOUND APA's past mistakes adding still yet another notch on that bed post or attempt to alter that history and change it for the better ?