Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Latest AA contract proposal >

Latest AA contract proposal

Search

Notices

Latest AA contract proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2015 | 07:55 PM
  #471  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
He says NO repeatedly, and lives in a opulent mansion. He never sold his talents for cheap...

AA Merger Magic for Our Real Estate Market: US Air Exec Snaps up Sharif & Munir Mansion on Strait Lane | Candy's Dirt
........but even with all that money, he still apparently can't afford taste. That place looks garishly awful. How appropriate.
Reply
Old 01-09-2015 | 02:53 AM
  #472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
The only certainty in voting no would be that we (probably) would keep the current contract. Which everyone hates.
LOA 93.1 (redux).
Reply
Old 01-09-2015 | 02:58 AM
  #473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
We also lose 2 years LOS as well. That's fairly significant for some of the furloughed guys. I know it's not full LOS, but you will not see full LOS either way. 2 years at DAL+7% would help those guys far better than zero LOS and the much lower MTA rates.

IMHO, "defending the profession" amounts to a phyrric victory. PK has a long history of not caving in to labor groups. There's no reason to think they'll start now. APA had a chance 2 years ago when the merger started in motion...they held the keys to the castle, but sold them for pennies on the dollar. *THAT* was leverage. We have very little leverage now.
Originally Posted by eaglefly
Who knows what we will ultimately lose ? I find it interesting that many advocating accepting this TA use certainties when discussing the losses by doing so, but when rejection advocates like me represent certainties in the future by not accepting it, we are guessing. Besides, your beloved Mr. Parker plans to stiff those who have differed their returns for whatever reason out of LOS, so it will only be applicable to those who chose to return at the first opportunity.



Pyrrhic victory.......ah, yes......shades of a Judge Silver.

If he isn't caving now, why would expect him to cave in 2020 ?

Do you expect him to suddenly negotiate fairly then ?

Is the best strategy to COMPOUND APA's past mistakes adding still yet another notch on that bed post or attempt to alter that history and change it for the better ?
1700 West Pilots alone are going to vote yes just because they've been in PHX for 10 years without reaping the benefits of two mergers. Seniority means nothing to them so they will try to capture as much of this merger as best they can.

Its amazing what a geographic group of pilots can do to flip the bird to the rest of the group. Taking the money.
Reply
Old 01-09-2015 | 06:43 AM
  #474  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
1700 West Pilots alone are going to vote yes just because they've been in PHX for 10 years without reaping the benefits of two mergers. Seniority means nothing to them so they will try to capture as much of this merger as best they can.

Its amazing what a geographic group of pilots can do to flip the bird to the rest of the group. Taking the money.
I agree, many will, but not all. It seems the West in this situation has been "Parkerized" more then any other sub-group here though. If anything, West pilots should be the most concerned about RSV callout provisions and language and HBT, both issues that directly affect QWL whether the latter adds jobs or not and where. That's because they will all almost certainly become commuters within 2-3 years, unless they already are to PHX or they plan to move away.

I feel for this group in that respect, because for them, their airline (and club) will essentially vaporize to melt within AA to become "only a memory, memory"...........
Reply
Old 01-09-2015 | 07:44 AM
  #475  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

The West is unlikely to be concerned about HBT and the reserve callout provisions, because they didn't have HBT rules like AA, and the original 2-hour language was actually pulled from their contract. And many West guys do commute to PHX. To them, it's essentially the same rules they've been dealing with for years, minus the long-rig (which is gone regardless of a yes or no vote).
Reply
Old 02-01-2015 | 10:19 AM
  #476  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

I started this thread and to end it I'm glad to see that 66% of us aren't so completely Stupid, in denial, completely self absorb, or consumed with Deorio disease "vote no because because I, you're self made, self appointed attorney don't know how or actually won't focus on anything else other than let me blame the current management for the fact that I'm not a wide body Captain working 8 days a month making 300k a year."
I know the work rules are not ideal but the LUS, East and West really need to take a deep breath and appreciate how far you have come. East guys, count your lucky stars that that your Even here to *****. By all rights USAir should have failed years ago, "bankruptcies anybody" and half of you guys would have been too old to go anywhere else and the rest of you would have been lucky to be new hires at AWA.
West guys, right back at cha. America west was NEVER going to become the next SWA, was itself hurting, remember who was first for bail out money? And at the end of the day would not have survived in its original form, with our without the 747's
Either way you have ALL come a looong way, from barely having a job and being somewhere just a few years ago that no one with a good regional job would bother to leave for, no military guy was willing to hitch his train to, either way we were the dregs of the majors, way behind even SWA. And now we are in a very exclusive, very small club of three, maybe not compensated quite as the deltoids, yet, but better than yonited and certainly in a better place that we were NEVER EVER going to achieve as USAirways.
Be grateful for the fortuitous changes that have come your way
Reply
Old 02-02-2015 | 11:09 AM
  #477  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cameltoad
I started this thread and to end it I'm glad to see that 66% of us aren't so completely Stupid, in denial, completely self absorb, or consumed with Deorio disease "vote no because because I, you're self made, self appointed attorney don't know how or actually won't focus on anything else other than let me blame the current management for the fact that I'm not a wide body Captain working 8 days a month making 300k a year."
I know the work rules are not ideal but the LUS, East and West really need to take a deep breath and appreciate how far you have come. East guys, count your lucky stars that that your Even here to *****. By all rights USAir should have failed years ago, "bankruptcies anybody" and half of you guys would have been too old to go anywhere else and the rest of you would have been lucky to be new hires at AWA.
West guys, right back at cha. America west was NEVER going to become the next SWA, was itself hurting, remember who was first for bail out money? And at the end of the day would not have survived in its original form, with our without the 747's
Either way you have ALL come a looong way, from barely having a job and being somewhere just a few years ago that no one with a good regional job would bother to leave for, no military guy was willing to hitch his train to, either way we were the dregs of the majors, way behind even SWA. And now we are in a very exclusive, very small club of three, maybe not compensated quite as the deltoids, yet, but better than yonited and certainly in a better place that we were NEVER EVER going to achieve as USAirways.
Be grateful for the fortuitous changes that have come your way
[yawn]
Reply
Old 02-02-2015 | 05:42 PM
  #478  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cameltoad
I started this thread and to end it I'm glad to see that 66% of us aren't so completely Stupid,
You do realize that you (yes voters) sold what little leverage we had for a measly 7% pay raise over the life of the contract (vs the MTA rates). If you subtract the 4% the rest of the company got, its only a 3% raise.
Yeah the pay raise may be a little front loaded and you will gain a few extra shekels but we are loosing in the long run.

Not surprising that alot of L-US Capts voted for this debacle as 80%+ won't be around to see the next contract, in 2022+.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deltajuliet
Regional
36
11-13-2014 09:25 AM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
Foxcow
Trans States Airlines
147
02-23-2009 09:08 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices