Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

JS Disagreement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2018 | 09:21 AM
  #41  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,187
Likes: 239
Default

Of all the mountains SAPA could have chosen to die on, it surprises me they picked this one.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 09:54 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bravix
"Legally"? Honest question, which law would prevent them from denying jumpseats?
If they’re represented by ALPA I believe that will cause a problem. ALPA national would definitely take UAs side.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 11:56 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default JS Disagreement

Originally Posted by Viking6
If they’re represented by ALPA I believe that will cause a problem. ALPA national would definitely take UAs side.

ALPA national has absolutely no way of doing anything about this. This issue is between MECs at each airline and their respective managements.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 12:07 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Default

IMO as much as SkyWest management hates unions I can't see them bowing down to UAL ALPA over this jump seat BS.

It would show the rank and file that unions do have a presence and can make a difference.

It will be interesting how this plays out?
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 12:29 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets
ALPA national has absolutely no way of doing anything about this. This issue is between MECs at each airline and their respective managements.
If that’s the case, then this may work. We were told that ALPA UAX carriers would probably not be able to participate. I suspect if all UAX carriers held the line on this, then it would get fixed.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 06:24 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Viking6
If they’re represented by ALPA I believe that will cause a problem. ALPA national would definitely take UAs side.
Even if that's the case, it wouldn't be a legal issue really. Legality has to do with laws, not union policies. I don't see why one MEC couldn't take action against another MEC which is trying to change an agreement without an agreement of terms. Union might not like it, I suppose they might have the power to threaten to drop that MEC from ALPA, though they wouldn't ($$$).

But I could be mistaken, which is why I asked, in case I was missing something.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 07:57 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bravix
Even if that's the case, it wouldn't be a legal issue really. Legality has to do with laws, not union policies. I don't see why one MEC couldn't take action against another MEC which is trying to change an agreement without an agreement of terms. Union might not like it, I suppose they might have the power to threaten to drop that MEC from ALPA, though they wouldn't ($$$).



But I could be mistaken, which is why I asked, in case I was missing something.

No MEC has power over any other MEC, let alone the power to drop an MEC from ALPA. That’s not the way ALPA is set up. Each individual pilot group is independent of the other and from national.
Reply
Old 09-16-2018 | 08:00 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Viking6
If that’s the case, then this may work. We were told that ALPA UAX carriers would probably not be able to participate. I suspect if all UAX carriers held the line on this, then it would get fixed.

Jumpseat agreements are by mutual and reciprocal agreement. If an agreement cannot be made, and therefore cancelled, there is no ability to Jumpseat on that carrier. And the only thing that can be done is to cancel any reciprocal agreement. That’s not ideal for anyone, including management.
Reply
Old 09-19-2018 | 09:07 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Default

FYI guys. United ex SkyWester here. You have a few people over in the UAL section tossing bombs. These randos are being quoted all over the interwebs and the anger level on the UAL side is approaching critical mass. I’d recommend telling them to relax and let SAPA do the talking until the time comes to distribute a letter.

I’d also like to remind everyone the last SAPA rep to not have a medical M.E. Sold out OO pilots and R.J. May not have one, I’m not positive he can get another job paying what he gets at OO. That’s bad juju.

I would also not trust anything the “pilots pilot” VP says about backing up SAPA reps and line pilots in this fight. Without making a statement on the merits of this argument, I could see TT changing the FOM without SAPA concurance. Because he can. And he doesn’t give a sh!t about any SkyWest pilot except himself.

Best wishes to everyone. I’m sure this will get ironed out. But if push comes to shove, I would be careful. TT wants lower attrition and UAL blacklisting OO guys would be good for him. Then he’ll sell you out and give UAL whatever they want.
Reply
Old 09-20-2018 | 12:32 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
FYI guys. United ex SkyWester here. You have a few people over in the UAL section tossing bombs. These randos are being quoted all over the interwebs and the anger level on the UAL side is approaching critical mass. I’d recommend telling them to relax and let SAPA do the talking until the time comes to distribute a letter.

I’d also like to remind everyone the last SAPA rep to not have a medical M.E. Sold out OO pilots and R.J. May not have one, I’m not positive he can get another job paying what he gets at OO. That’s bad juju.

I would also not trust anything the “pilots pilot” VP says about backing up SAPA reps and line pilots in this fight. Without making a statement on the merits of this argument, I could see TT changing the FOM without SAPA concurance. Because he can. And he doesn’t give a sh!t about any SkyWest pilot except himself.

Best wishes to everyone. I’m sure this will get ironed out. But if push comes to shove, I would be careful. TT wants lower attrition and UAL blacklisting OO guys would be good for him. Then he’ll sell you out and give UAL whatever they want.







TT?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tennisguru
Regional
10
09-22-2015 06:57 PM
apla
Union Talk
3
07-22-2014 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices