Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Voting yes or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2018 | 12:25 PM
  #101  
Skyhawk121's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 248
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by word302
It’s not the rates that most of us have a problem with.
What is it that you have a problem with? As a 3+ year CA in MSP I am pretty happy with it and am a yes vote.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 01:45 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by word302
It’s not the rates that most of us have a problem with.

Signing bonuses?



Most companies are doing it already. Whether you like it or not.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 01:49 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 217
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Skyhawk121
What is it that you have a problem with? As a 3+ year CA in MSP I am pretty happy with it and am a yes vote.
It's the complete lack of QOL improvements. Major QOL improvements will never come outside of a pay agreement. We get so blinded by rates we forget what really matters are work rules.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 01:51 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 217
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by hawk21
Signing bonuses?



Most companies are doing it already. Whether you like it or not.
That's a very small portion of my gripes. We should be getting much more in return for it though.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 02:34 PM
  #105  
Skyhawk121's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 248
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by word302
It's the complete lack of QOL improvements. Major QOL improvements will never come outside of a pay agreement. We get so blinded by rates we forget what really matters are work rules.
I'm not blinded by rates, but there is still enough there to get a yes out of me. What QOL are you wanting specifically?
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 02:37 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 217
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Skyhawk121
I'm not blinded by rates, but there is still enough there to get a yes out of me. What QOL are you wanting specifically?
85 hour cap on awarded hours, include reserves in all guarantees, 150% for awarded hours above 85, higher MDG, better trip rig, real language controlling staffing levels.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 02:49 PM
  #107  
Skyhawk121's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 248
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by word302
85 hour cap on awarded hours, include reserves in all guarantees, 150% for awarded hours above 85, higher MDG, better trip rig, real language controlling staffing levels.
Well to touch on a couple of these items, why would they raise MDG when us and Republic are the only two carriers at 4:12 everyone else in the industry is lower. Endeavor is 4:00.

Most of the regionals don't have a trip rig, but all of them that do have 1:4, so it's not like our trip rig is lagging behind the industry.

Maybe it is because I flew for a different regional prior to coming here, but if you went and did some time there, it would be a major eye opener for you.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 02:52 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 217
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Skyhawk121
Well to touch on a couple of these items, why would they raise MDG when us and Republic are the only two carriers at 4:12 everyone else in the industry is lower. Endeavor is 4:00.

Most of the regionals don't have a trip rig, but all of them that do have 1:4, so it's not like our trip rig is lagging behind the industry.

Maybe it is because I flew for a different regional prior to coming here, but if you went and did some time there, it would be a major eye opener for you.
So as the biggest, most profitable regional airline in history we should just wait for others to raise the bar?
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 02:59 PM
  #109  
Skyhawk121's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 248
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by word302
So as the biggest, most profitable regional airline in history we should just wait for others to raise the bar?
The people running this company aren't stupid. The reason why this airline has existed for almost 50 years is because we are profitable. If pilot costs increase too much, you end up with another comair.
Reply
Old 10-17-2018 | 03:16 PM
  #110  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by word302
It's the complete lack of QOL improvements. Major QOL improvements will never come outside of a pay agreement. We get so blinded by rates we forget what really matters are work rules.
I wouldn't say there has been a complete lack of QOL improvements. With one the last TRs, we can get a hotel in base after a cancel or reflow, regardless of the layover length (previously it wasn't possible unless your next trip started in less than 12 hours, or if you convinced crew support to ask RG to approve one). We're also moving from the Surface to iPad soon, which actually has a usable modem.

Sure, protection for commuters hasn't gotten any better (and probably never will), but I live in my base, so none of that really concerns me to be honest.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sun Tzu
JetBlue
194
07-20-2018 08:04 PM
DALFA
Delta
295
05-06-2017 09:04 AM
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
DLax85
Cargo
9
08-05-2007 06:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices