Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   SkyWest to sell ExpressJet to United Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/118712-skywest-sell-expressjet-united-airlines.html)

HuskerAv8tor 12-18-2018 08:35 AM

SkyWest to sell ExpressJet to United Airlines
 
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/skywe...1WITzAZkqnsBoI

Bluewaffle 12-18-2018 09:02 AM

Re think the threat title perhaps

MasterOfPuppets 12-18-2018 09:04 AM

Interesting. Anyone know how many of the 175s United owns? I know they own the entire Mesa fleet and some if not all of the 175s at RAH. Im not sure if they own any of the SkyWest 175s.

I ask because I can see all the United assets being transferred to ExpressJet now. We can start controlling our 70 seat regionals a little better and maybe get a better product.

I hope the end game is to absorb this LLC and bring the 70 seat flying in house. I can see United ordering another 20 of the 175s configured to 70 seats (SC) and give them to Xjet. This would park all CRJ 700s at Mesa and Go jet. The only ones left would be with SkyWest to fly to ASE.

Anyways I think this is a positive for United and we will see if it is a positive or a negative for United pilots......can't wait to see the New contract.

HuskerAv8tor 12-18-2018 09:05 AM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727308)
Re think the threat title perhaps

United a minority partner in ManaAir LLC. I believe UAL is in the end pulling all the strings.

Voski 12-18-2018 09:08 AM

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...enture-454518/

Squallrider 12-18-2018 09:16 AM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2727310)
Interesting. Anyone know how many of the 175s United owns? I know they own the entire Mesa fleet and some if not all of the 175s at RAH. Im not sure if they own any of the SkyWest 175s.

I ask because I can see all the United assets being transferred to ExpressJet now. We can start controlling our 70 seat regionals a little better and maybe get a better product.

I hope the end game is to absorb this LLC and bring the 70 seat flying in house. I can see United ordering another 20 of the 175s configured to 70 seats (SC) and give them to Xjet. This would park all CRJ 700s at Mesa and Go jet. The only ones left would be with SkyWest to fly to ASE.

Anyways I think this is a positive for United and we will see if it is a positive or a negative for United pilots......can't wait to see the New contract.

They don’t own any of the SkyWest 175s

Sniper66 12-18-2018 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by Squallrider (Post 2727330)
They don’t own any of the SkyWest 175s



48 at Mesa and 20 at Republic I think.
All back as leases coming to end and watch for the bigger Ejets order coming .
Lufthansa style all one seniority when the TA comes

76 seaters to 364 seaters all flown by United seniority pilots
There you have your 15000 pilot seniority list

Good for everyone I would say

Bluewaffle 12-18-2018 09:38 AM


Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 2727348)
48 at Mesa and 20 at Republic I think.
All back as leases coming to end and watch for the bigger Ejets order coming .
Lufthansa style all one seniority when the TA comes

76 seaters to 364 seaters all flown by United seniority pilots
There you have your 15000 pilot seniority list

Good for everyone I would say

Lots of bold assumptions with this one ☝️

fadec 12-18-2018 09:49 AM

So if you're at XJT, do you still do the United interview when they call?

RoyerYetlink 12-18-2018 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by fadec (Post 2727367)
So if you're at XJT, do you still do the United interview when they call?

I would say yes. Get out of the regionals as fast as you can. Why wouldn’t you interview?

MasterOfPuppets 12-18-2018 10:56 AM


Originally Posted by fadec (Post 2727367)
So if you're at XJT, do you still do the United interview when they call?

Absolutely. If we absorb the pilots at Xjet it will be a full blown staple and no one could argue otherwise. So if you get hired by UA now you will be senior to all the current Xjet pilots.

trip 12-18-2018 11:16 AM

Have no fear, the shell corporation will keep the pilots separate, no claim to one list that way (Comair). This will be home to the zero-hero build your hours with a United owned airline. The whipsaw will live on.

Itsajob 12-18-2018 11:21 AM

How would any of this change how United hires? XJT is getting some 175’s, but why would that change the current CPP? I can see where this is good for the near term future of XJT, but it in no way means that it will lead to a flow agreement or any other increased chance of XJT pilots gaining employment with United Airlines. United wants to pick and choose who they hire. If anyone can actually figure out exactly what they are looking for, they could get rich selling interview preparation classes. The jury is out on that one.

John Carr 12-18-2018 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by fadec (Post 2727367)
So if you're at XJT, do you still do the United interview when they call?

Nope, it just means you'll get sent the HPI.

Pass that, THEN you'll get a F2F.

4V14T0R 12-18-2018 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 2727348)
48 at Mesa and 20 at Republic I think.
All back as leases coming to end and watch for the bigger Ejets order coming .
Lufthansa style all one seniority when the TA comes

76 seaters to 364 seaters all flown by United seniority pilots
There you have your 15000 pilot seniority list

Good for everyone I would say



I’m pretty sure it’s only 12 hulls at YX.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Squallrider 12-18-2018 02:49 PM

I saw a quote somewhere that it won’t affect flow / cpp , source wasn’t specified so it’s as legit as anything on the internet ha

full of luv 12-18-2018 06:22 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2727394)
Absolutely. If we absorb the pilots at Xjet it will be a full blown staple and no one could argue otherwise. So if you get hired by UA now you will be senior to all the current Xjet pilots.

I'd say the #1 argument for Mgmt not to absorb any pilots, staple or not, is that they lose the benefit of restarting their longevity. Even with a "flow" UAL gets to restart the longevity and all that entails when they join the mainline list. Same as everywhere else.

ShyGuy 12-18-2018 06:51 PM

DOH is the gold standard! :D

rickair7777 12-18-2018 07:09 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2727394)
Absolutely. If we absorb the pilots at Xjet it will be a full blown staple and no one could argue otherwise. So if you get hired by UA now you will be senior to all the current Xjet pilots.

Actually... you can't do a staple anymore, especially with ALPA/ALPA. There would have to be a fair and equitable integration.

You can sort of make the case that a staple is sort of fair but the more senior XJT people (the majority of them) will insist on something for their longevity. Established precedent will give them something.

Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).

Itsajob 12-18-2018 07:20 PM

Absolutely. If we absorb the pilots at Xjet it will be a full blown staple and no one could argue otherwise. So if you get hired by UA now you will be senior to all the current Xjet pilots.

Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).


There is no need for the United to absorb anyone. They can simply hire the pilots that they like in the interview process and move on. I don’t see 70 seat jets at mainline any time soon, but if we did the pilots who currently fly those planes don’t have to come with them. United already owns the metal. It isn’t an airline acquisition that would trigger some sort of pilots come too deal. All they have to do is bring the planes to mainline when the leases to the regionals expire and hire from all available sources accordingly. Not wishing a sharp stick in anyone’s eye, just looking at this from a company or legal point of view.

Bluewaffle 12-18-2018 07:29 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 2727652)
Actually... you can't do a staple anymore, especially with ALPA/ALPA. There would have to be a fair and equitable integration.

You can sort of make the case that a staple is sort of fair but the more senior XJT people (the majority of them) will insist on something for their longevity. Established precedent will give them something.

Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).

ALPA merger policy wouldn’t apply with a regional takeover

Nevjets 12-18-2018 08:31 PM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727657)
ALPA merger policy wouldn’t apply with a regional takeover



Why not? Both pilot groups are ALPA. It’s been a while but I don’t remember reading anything in the ALPA merger policy saying it wouldn’t apply in this type of situation. The career expectations part of the policy would apply overwhelmingly favorably to mainline pilots. So much so that a straight staple may be seen as fair and equitably by a panel of arbitrators.

CLRtoPush 12-18-2018 10:11 PM

.......................

JuniorFO 12-19-2018 03:14 AM

I bet a B scale is coming

amcnd 12-19-2018 04:37 AM

I love how XJT thinks UA bought them...... UA will pull the strings.( I.e want there E145’s as cheap as there other joint ventures”) but good bet is the Commute Air CEO is going to be there yes man..

JuniorFO 12-19-2018 05:15 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2727766)
I love how XJT thinks UA bought them...... UA will pull the strings.( I.e want there E145’s as cheap as there other joint ventures”) but good bet is the Commute Air CEO is going to be there yes man..

They own more of XJT than SkyWest.

amcnd 12-19-2018 05:29 AM


Originally Posted by JuniorFO (Post 2727785)
They own more of XJT than SkyWest.

Yes they do.. (or will) but not a Majority. But its cute to play like you are UA pilots. They will love that..

Meen while, OO still gouges you on I.T. Services...

5. Will ExpressJet people become United employees?
No, they will remain employed by ExpressJet and owned by a third party United joint venture.

6. How long will SkyWest, Inc. continue to support certain functions in IT, Accounting and Benefits?
A transition period is customary and may be between 6-18 months.

rickair7777 12-19-2018 06:03 AM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727657)
ALPA merger policy wouldn’t apply with a regional takeover

Oh yes it would. There are no legal provisions (that I've heard of) which apply the traditional major airline pilot cultural superiority and entitlement to an SLI. In both federal law and ALPA policy an airline is an airline is an airline.

Now you could make a case that "fair and equitable" would be something that looks a lot like a staple, since both career expectations and longevity are low on the regional side but some senior RJ guys would get a big windfall and the left seat of at least a NB.

That's why the senior lifers at COMAIR pushed so hard for seniority integration at DAL... it would have tripled their pay overnight.

In other words, what Nevjets just said.

Bluewaffle 12-19-2018 06:23 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 2727813)
Oh yes it would. There are no legal provisions (that I've heard of) which apply the traditional major airline pilot cultural superiority and entitlement to an SLI. In both federal law and ALPA policy an airline is an airline is an airline.

Now you could make a case that "fair and equitable" would be something that looks a lot like a staple, since both career expectations and longevity are low on the regional side but some senior RJ guys would get a big windfall and the left seat of at least a NB.

That's why the senior lifers at COMAIR pushed so hard for seniority integration at DAL... it would have tripled their pay overnight.

In other words, what Nevjets just said.

“Some Senior RJ guys would get a big windfall”. There in lies the problem. How do you weigh longevity at a regional? No RJ lifer deserves to be in front of a mainline new hire. Period. An indefinite fence perhaps?

Botched 12-19-2018 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727826)
“Some Senior RJ guys would get a big windfall”. There in lies the problem. How do you weigh longevity at a regional? No RJ lifer deserves to be in front of a mainline new hire. Period. An indefinite fence perhaps?

Why are people even talking about a merger? Dream on kids.

flynd94 12-19-2018 07:18 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2727796)
Yes they do.. (or will) but not a Majority. But its cute to play like you are UA pilots. They will love that..

Meen while, OO still gouges you on I.T. Services...

5. Will ExpressJet people become United employees?
No, they will remain employed by ExpressJet and owned by a third party United joint venture.

6. How long will SkyWest, Inc. continue to support certain functions in IT, Accounting and Benefits?
A transition period is customary and may be between 6-18 months.

Wash, rinse, repeat. Their services suck. I can’t imagine it getting any worse then currently. Only after threatening to get a lawyer did the “awesome” HR dept finally correct my issues

da42pilot 12-19-2018 07:20 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2727796)
Yes they do.. (or will) but not a Majority. But its cute to play like you are UA pilots. They will love that..

Meen while, OO still gouges you on I.T. Services...

5. Will ExpressJet people become United employees?
No, they will remain employed by ExpressJet and owned by a third party United joint venture.

6. How long will SkyWest, Inc. continue to support certain functions in IT, Accounting and Benefits?
A transition period is customary and may be between 6-18 months.

Don’t be ridiculous. Nobody is acting like they’re United pilots at XJT.

gojo 12-19-2018 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by da42pilot (Post 2727863)
Don’t be ridiculous. Nobody is acting like they’re United pilots at XJT.

That’s just Skywest pilots pouting. Oh no, someone is getting new planes, and it isn’t us.... They’ve been brainwashed into believing that Express Jet has been a financial drain on the Mighty Skywest, and don’t understand that Skywest is responsible for that. Gotta be because Express Jet is union, right?

rickair7777 12-19-2018 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727826)
“Some Senior RJ guys would get a big windfall”. There in lies the problem. How do you weigh longevity at a regional? No RJ lifer deserves to be in front of a mainline new hire. Period. An indefinite fence perhaps?

The regional group would not agree to indefinite fences. The inevitable arbitration would nor grant indefinite fences.

This is why XJT (or any other regional) will probably not be absorbed into UA (or any other major).

The hate and discontent would be epic, would make the Airways/Cactus SLI look like a lovefest.

I said "probably" because if the pilot shortage got bad enough somebody might go there.

Nevjets 12-19-2018 09:05 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2727766)
I love how XJT thinks UA bought them...... UA will pull the strings.( I.e want there E145’s as cheap as there other joint ventures”) but good bet is the Commute Air CEO is going to be there yes man..



Why do you love that? You have some kind of animosity towards them? Technically, United did buy xjt, a minority part. And if United is pulling the strings, I think anyone is better than your CC at this point.

Nevjets 12-19-2018 09:07 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2727796)
Yes they do.. (or will) but not a Majority. But its cute to play like you are UA pilots. They will love that..



Meen while, OO still gouges you on I.T. Services...



5. Will ExpressJet people become United employees?

No, they will remain employed by ExpressJet and owned by a third party United joint venture.



6. How long will SkyWest, Inc. continue to support certain functions in IT, Accounting and Benefits?

A transition period is customary and may be between 6-18 months.


That’s true on the IT gouge, until the transaction is complete. Xjt will be United employees as much as they were Skywest employees. Which is to say, xjt employees are xjt employees while being partly owned by United instead of wholly owned by Skywest. That’s a good thing for xjt employees.

Nevjets 12-19-2018 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 2727826)
“Some Senior RJ guys would get a big windfall”. There in lies the problem. How do you weigh longevity at a regional? No RJ lifer deserves to be in front of a mainline new hire. Period. An indefinite fence perhaps?


You couldn’t have a fence that lasts any longer than when the next new hire is hired. Otherwise that new hire would be able to progress past the career expectations of the RJ lifer and all pilots behind him.

This is all academic, but just because you have two airlines with disparate career expectations does not mean that ALPA merger policy wouldn’t apply. It just means that arbitrators would have to take all those things into consideration when constructing and SLI. And that could mean a straight staple and done.

SlamClicker 12-19-2018 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2727310)
I hope the end game is to absorb this LLC and bring the 70 seat flying in house.

Never happen -
Scope clause
Union prohibits majority ownership and most important why would any airline want all of suddenly double their labor cost overnight for 0 benefit in return.

flightlevels 12-19-2018 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by HuskerAv8tor (Post 2727297)

Not to UAL, to MalaAIr

Melit 12-19-2018 02:47 PM


Originally Posted by JuniorFO (Post 2727785)
They own more of XJT than SkyWest.

You my friend are a genius


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:45 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands