![]() |
Originally Posted by PilotBrandon07
(Post 2996546)
IMHO Skywest is in a better place than the majors. They negotiate minimum block hours when they sign the long contracts so they're going to get paid unless majors start declaring bankruptcy. This is not uncharted territory for SGU. They know what they're doing.
|
Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30
(Post 2997170)
All of which can be voided, disregarded or otherwise violated and excused during national emergencies and from forces beyond the code share partner’s control. Everyone will be in for some short term hurt at least.
|
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 2995790)
Do you ever say something positive? Apart from all the "facts" you love and all the drama, justified or not. Have you ever tried been positive to compensate a little bit. You should try.
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2996574)
All this bickering and trying to figure out what the future holds. Having worked through 9/11. Just be glad you have a job. That pays $50 a hr to start. Back them. We were all getting $19-24 a hour and blessed just to have a flying job.. hunker down. And don't get picky if your job hunting...
|
Originally Posted by hawk21
(Post 2997510)
Preach. We could be like the TSH holdings carriers. Thankful to be in the position I am right now given the current situation.
|
Out of curiosity do the scope clauses mandate regional fleet reductions concomitant with mainline reductions and in some specified ratio?
|
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 2998068)
Out of curiosity do the scope clauses mandate regional fleet reductions concomitant with mainline reductions and in some specified ratio?
Every regional will feel the effects the next 2-6 months. Its after that that you will want to watch what ones bounce back and what ones are hanging on by a thread.. |
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2998088)
depends. Some regionals have minimum block hour guarantee.. And EAS routes are subsidized and must be flown.. We have seen this before. Some regionals thrived. Some really hurt. Look back at history and you can figure out who has good contracts with there partner that keeps them flying..
Every regional will feel the effects the next 2-6 months. Its after that that you will want to watch what ones bounce back and what ones are hanging on by a thread.. |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 2997309)
not really - not without a legacy going bankrupt
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 2998125)
agreed, but I would be surprised if there wasn’t a clause for events such as this?
|
Originally Posted by BOLO170
(Post 2998286)
It’s a clause I’m certain. I’m sure all your contracts have a “Force Majeure” clause. I wouldn’t worry, unless this continues through the summer.
Force majeure "chance occurrence, unavoidable accident",[1] is a common clause in contracts that essentially frees both parties from liability or obligation when an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond the control of the parties, such as a war, strike, riot, crime, or an event described by the legal term act of God (hurricane, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption, etc.) |
Originally Posted by BOLO170
(Post 2998286)
It’s a clause I’m certain. I’m sure all your contracts have a “Force Majeure” clause. I wouldn’t worry, unless this continues through the summer.
The quickest (and deadliest) way to deal with this is through herd immunity. The UK might be planning this as we speak. The rest of the world is trying to slow it down to fight it in pieces. The problem with that, while less may die from it, the resolution gets pushed out farther. |
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 2998068)
Out of curiosity do the scope clauses mandate regional fleet reductions concomitant with mainline reductions and in some specified ratio?
|
Wow. 10 lines for FO’s in LAX this month when there used to be close to 60. Many bases have 0. I can’t even imagine how long it will take to get that flying back. I will be on reserve until I get furloughed. Flying my last trip starting today. Bummed out in a big way. This was a career change for me and it will be really hard if not impossible to get back to my old career. It’s gonna be minimum wage jobs with an ATP and a degree in engineering. Reality stinks.
|
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3005029)
Wow. 10 lines for FO’s in LAX this month when there used to be close to 60. Many bases have 0. I can’t even imagine how long it will take to get that flying back. I will be on reserve until I get furloughed. Flying my last trip starting today. Bummed out in a big way. This was a career change for me and it will be really hard if not impossible to get back to my old career. It’s gonna be minimum wage jobs with an ATP and a degree in engineering. Reality stinks.
|
I think SAPA and the company did a great job with the VTO and CPTO leave options. I'm interested in the paid 50 hrs off option.
|
And the 30% min. Long Call Reserve
|
I’m hearing from OO pilots that the April bid (delta side) includes voluntary one month paid leave at 50 hours credit or sit reserve for 67.5 hours credit. No furloughs. Given delta makes it sound like they’re on their final straw, the OO side sounds like they’re in good shape?
|
Originally Posted by Highflyer35
(Post 3005096)
I’m hearing from OO pilots that the April bid (delta side) includes voluntary one month paid leave at 50 hours credit or sit reserve for 67.5 hours credit. No furloughs. Given delta makes it sound like they’re on their final straw, the OO side sounds like they’re in good shape?
Doesn't have to do with Delta. They are offering 50hr paid month off keep all benefits ect... (Delta hasn't provided flying data to build pairings yet.) |
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 3005102)
Doesn't have to do with Delta. They are offering 50hr paid month off keep all benefits ect...
(Delta hasn't provided flying data to build pairings yet.) |
Really? Everyone congratulating SAPA for a job well done? What a blatant disregard for seniority and 'policy'. People make decisions to stay or go based off of what is written in the PPM. Then when a situation occurs that would actually require the application of it, it gets pencil whipped to whatever the company desires. This should have been voluntary leave (including 50hr zero block months) followed by furloughs if necessary.
|
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005119)
Really? Everyone congratulating SAPA for a job well done? What a blatant disregard for seniority and 'policy'. People make decisions to stay or go based off of what is written in the PPM. Then when a situation occurs that would actually require the application of it, it gets pencil whipped to whatever the company desires. This should have been voluntary leave (including 50hr zero block months) followed by furloughs if necessary.
|
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005119)
Really? Everyone congratulating SAPA for a job well done? What a blatant disregard for seniority and 'policy'. People make decisions to stay or go based off of what is written in the PPM. Then when a situation occurs that would actually require the application of it, it gets pencil whipped to whatever the company desires. This should have been voluntary leave (including 50hr zero block months) followed by furloughs if necessary.
|
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005119)
Really? Everyone congratulating SAPA for a job well done? What a blatant disregard for seniority and 'policy'. People make decisions to stay or go based off of what is written in the PPM. Then when a situation occurs that would actually require the application of it, it gets pencil whipped to whatever the company desires. This should have been voluntary leave (including 50hr zero block months) followed by furloughs if necessary.
Are you saying a senior PDX 175 guy flying AK only (who’s not drawing down) should get a CPTO line vs a more junior MSP captain flying only DL (who’s making massive reductions)? That would require several seat a and base swaps. I think you need to see the complexities of the SKYW operation and realize this is a good compromise and attempt to avoid furloughs. |
Originally Posted by UnderCenter
(Post 3005042)
The reason there are bases with only reserve is because AA and Delta haven’t sent over the schedule package yet, not that there isn’t any flying. In order to comply with posting the bid by today, that had to make bases with only AA or Delta flying all reserve because they don’t have the pairing to build lines. Once they get the schedules from AA and Delta, I assume they will start assigning the trips to everyone. In looking at DEN and COS, it’s not as bad as I thought it would be, but I guess they could still cancel a lot of those flight who knows.
|
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3005148)
who gets these trips as they trickle in? Will it be open time that gets assigned to reserve pilots? Those would have been my trips when I was a line holder. Should I have call me first turned on to maybe get some of those trips?
Trips will in restricted open time. Reserves proffer in seniority order for the trips... |
Originally Posted by trip
(Post 3005139)
Isn't that what it is?
Are you saying a senior PDX 175 guy flying AK only (who’s not drawing down) should get a CPTO line vs a more junior MSP captain flying only DL (who’s making massive reductions)? That would require several seat a and base swaps. I think you need to see the complexities of the SKYW operation and realize this is a good compromise and attempt to avoid furloughs. It should simply be monthly guarantee of 75. The company can offer various voluntary leaves. If that is not enough, furlough. |
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005168)
I'm saying labor shouldn't be giving up anything in order to 'mitigate furloughs'. Instead entire domiciles are going on reserve. Reduction in line holder guarantee to 72. Reduction in reserve guarantee to 67. The 50 hour zero block offer can be reduced to 36 if ATC shuts down.
It should simply be monthly guarantee of 75. The company can offer various voluntary leaves. If that is not enough, furlough. |
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005168)
I'm saying labor shouldn't be giving up anything in order to 'mitigate furloughs'. Instead entire domiciles are going on reserve. Reduction in line holder guarantee to 72. Reduction in reserve guarantee to 67. The 50 hour zero block offer can be reduced to 36 if ATC shuts down.
It should simply be monthly guarantee of 75. The company can offer various voluntary leaves. If that is not enough, furlough. You're a ****ing douchebag |
Originally Posted by Utah
(Post 3005181)
As long as you get your 100+ hours a month a **** everyone else right.
You're a ****ing douchebag |
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005187)
Personally, I try to work the minimum days/hours I can. When at work I do my job as asked. But I expect the company to bear the brunt of costs when need be. Not labor. And seniority should never be violated like it has been with this and repeatedly in recent years at Skywest.
And if you like to work min hours/days this should be great for you. Seriously though, you are an A S S to advocate furloughs so you can keep a higher monthly credit. |
Originally Posted by Utah
(Post 3005194)
Where the hell are you seeing seniority violated. These leave programs are going to be awarded by seniority. Unless they don't have enough takers, then it will be by inverse seniority for a paid 50 hours a month. They'll be plenty that put in for the paid 50 hours a month. You'd be an idiot not to if you are a commuter to a reserve only base next month.
And if you like to work min hours/days this should be great for you. Seriously though, you are an A S S to advocate furloughs so you can keep a higher monthly credit. I understand that seniority is everything in the airline industry, and on a normal basis it should be untouchable. But in a situation like this.....if you normally make 10, but now you're gonna make 5 so that someone you fly with can make another 5 instead of 0...where's the problem? Better to keep makingg 10 even if a fellow pilot makes 0? seriously? |
Boo overthrust!
|
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3005219)
100% A S S
I understand that seniority is everything in the airline industry, and on a normal basis it should be untouchable. But in a situation like this.....if you normally make 10, but now you're gonna make 5 so that someone you fly with can make another 5 instead of 0...where's the problem? Better to keep makingg 10 even if a fellow pilot makes 0? seriously? |
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005168)
I'm saying labor shouldn't be giving up anything in order to 'mitigate furloughs'. Instead entire domiciles are going on reserve. Reduction in line holder guarantee to 72. Reduction in reserve guarantee to 67. The 50 hour zero block offer can be reduced to 36 if ATC shuts down.
It should simply be monthly guarantee of 75. The company can offer various voluntary leaves. If that is not enough, furlough. |
Everyone should lighten up. What a guy thinks today might be the opposite of what he thinks tomorrow after a little debating goes on. There are lots of ways to see things here and they are all correct, and they are all wrong. Also, they will all change.
|
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005119)
Really? Everyone congratulating SAPA for a job well done? What a blatant disregard for seniority and 'policy'. People make decisions to stay or go based off of what is written in the PPM. Then when a situation occurs that would actually require the application of it, it gets pencil whipped to whatever the company desires. This should have been voluntary leave (including 50hr zero block months) followed by furloughs if necessary.
|
Don't forget that Trump Check.
TRUMP CHECK! |
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3005436)
Don't forget that Trump Check.
TRUMP CHECK! That's assuming they can find buyers for T-bills if the interest rate goes negative, which it may well do (see: Germany, Japan)... |
Originally Posted by overthrust
(Post 3005187)
Personally, I try to work the minimum days/hours I can. When at work I do my job as asked. But I expect the company to bear the brunt of costs when need be. Not labor. And seniority should never be violated like it has been with this and repeatedly in recent years at Skywest.
Seriously? The company you've been at "10-20' years. Can very well go bankrupt if they had the same attitude you do. You obviously don't give a rats ass about your fellow coworkers. Doesn't matter if they're below you. And we all know you crusty seniors get max days off. You're still making x4 than 80% of those below you. You can stomach VTO for three months. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:49 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands