ERJ FO -> CRJ CA

Subscribe
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to
Quote: Yup! Almost everyone in my upgrade class is no longer at OO. It gave us the kick in the pants that we kinda needed.

As for upgrading into a different airplane, no question that the mighty RJ is a bit more demanding in terms of systems knowledge and some procedures than the 175, for example the CA originating flows and FFOD procedures for the Deuce, which are quite lengthy. My reco here would be to get hold of the training materials early and show up to training with at least a basic understanding of the flows and systems. When I got the upgrade notice, I would show up early to every flight and spend a few minutes in the left seat teaching myself the CA flows from the left seat. My CAs were only too happy to help me learn that stuff quickly.

Also, for anyone with their heart set on a mainline career... If you think the mighty Canadian Reset Jet is archaic, just wait till you get to Guppy training. The RJ is a modern technological marvel compared to the Guppy. The RJ has a simpler and more logical approach to systems design, and the lack of an EICAS in the 73 leads to some head -scratching moments during non-normal procedures in which systems knowledge is essential. So for a 175 driver, upgrading into the less-technologically-advanced CRJ will provide a solid precursor to eventually moving into the dinosaur from Renton...
Not to turn this into a Boeing vs CRJ debate. But I actually would disagree on this take. I found the 737 way easier to manage than the CRJ.

Autothrottle and VNAV make many of the STARS and approaches a mindless game of dialing the bottom altitude.

The displays were way better and having flaps speeds on speed tape as opposed the PM calling them out gave infinitely better SA.

Recall isn’t really that bad. And outside of initial and CQ you rarely get those head scratching moments on the line.
Reply
Quote: Not to turn this into a Boeing vs CRJ debate. But I actually would disagree on this take. I found the 737 way easier to manage than the CRJ.

Autothrottle and VNAV make many of the STARS and approaches a mindless game of dialing the bottom altitude.

The displays were way better and having flaps speeds on speed tape as opposed the PM calling them out gave infinitely better SA.

Recall isn’t really that bad. And outside of initial and CQ you rarely get those head scratching moments on the line.

all a matter of perspective

CRJ - king of vertical speed
Guppy - very seldom
Reply
Quote: Not to turn this into a Boeing vs CRJ debate. But I actually would disagree on this take. I found the 737 way easier to manage than the CRJ.

Autothrottle and VNAV make many of the STARS and approaches a mindless game of dialing the bottom altitude.

The displays were way better and having flaps speeds on speed tape as opposed the PM calling them out gave infinitely better SA.

Recall isn’t really that bad. And outside of initial and CQ you rarely get those head scratching moments on the line.
Yup, all very valid points. I think I'm approaching it more from a perspective of training, rather than line flying. In my mind, the lack of an EICAS means that when significant system failures occur, you're spending more brainpower deciding "which of these 12 lights should I run a QRH procedure for?", as opposed to in an RJ where you pretty much just go to the QRH procedure that matches the EICAS message.

Plus, RNAV / RNP approaches in the 73... The amount of box fiddling you have to do before the approach even begins is significantly more than flying an RNAV approach in an RJ. I used to think Skywest's old CANPA procedures were irritating, but they were way simpler than setting up the box for an RNP approach.

All that said, I agree, VNAV and AT make things way easier in the terminal area. I just think that the 1960s systems design in the 73 makes many non-normals more complicated than they need to be...
Reply
Quote: Not to turn this into a Boeing vs CRJ debate. But I actually would disagree on this take. I found the 737 way easier to manage than the CRJ.

Autothrottle and VNAV make many of the STARS and approaches a mindless game of dialing the bottom altitude.

The displays were way better and having flaps speeds on speed tape as opposed the PM calling them out gave infinitely better SA.

Recall isn’t really that bad. And outside of initial and CQ you rarely get those head scratching moments on the line.
Ya I think the 737 is way easier to fly than any crj.

Fight me.
Reply
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to