Originally Posted by HermannGraf
(Post 1595760)
I am sorry the guys at Envoy that are fighting not only for themselves but for all pilots at the Regional level are seeing the flying go away to other places. Some pilots can say that we as pilots have nothing to do with it and that it is only management that is to blame but I see this flying coming to us as a clear result of our pilot group voting yes for our concessionary pay package that gave our management the opportunity to be even cheaper. Our vote result was wrong when others are fighting for us. The pilot group was told from different sources that we did not have any leverage and immediately after the vote media was full of our leverage. It is sad that we as a pilot group did not understand the situation better and that we did not stand stronger but it is done and we should learn from it. Negotiations are about to start again and this time we should stand firm and demand what we have lost in years. There will be plenty of flying around as every Regional will have a hard time finding pilots and attrition is killing them.
To the Envoy guys, I am sorry. |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1595715)
I'm surprised the majors have made Skywest such a huge part of their feed. Exposes them to a ton of risk if Skywest ever has staffing problems.
|
To be completely thorough, SkyWest Airlines currently does 1,018 average daily departures for United, 491 for Delta, 89 for US Airways, 87 for American and 29 for Alaska. Exact numbers are unavailable for ExpressJet but if I had to guess...
SkyWest, Inc. - 2,100 United, 1,500 Delta, 160 American, 89 US Airways and 29 Alaska. I don't believe Envoy has much to worry about at this point. |
Originally Posted by HermannGraf
(Post 1595760)
I am sorry the guys at Envoy that are fighting not only for themselves but for all pilots at the Regional level are seeing the flying go away to other places. Some pilots can say that we as pilots have nothing to do with it and that it is only management that is to blame but I see this flying coming to us as a clear result of our pilot group voting yes for our concessionary pay package that gave our management the opportunity to be even cheaper. Our vote result was wrong when others are fighting for us. The pilot group was told from different sources that we did not have any leverage and immediately after the vote media was full of our leverage. It is sad that we as a pilot group did not understand the situation better and that we did not stand stronger but it is done and we should learn from it. Negotiations are about to start again and this time we should stand firm and demand what we have lost in years. There will be plenty of flying around as every Regional will have a hard time finding pilots and attrition is killing them.
To the Envoy guys, I am sorry. |
Originally Posted by NVUS
(Post 1595774)
To be completely thorough, SkyWest Airlines currently does 1,018 average daily departures for United, 491 for Delta, 89 for US Airways, 87 for American and 29 for Alaska. Exact numbers are unavailable for ExpressJet but if I had to guess...
SkyWest, Inc. - 2,100 United, 1,500 Delta, 160 American, 89 US Airways and 29 Alaska. I don't believe Envoy has much to worry about at this point. UA 1483 DL 758 AA 69 Total 2310 |
Originally Posted by JustAMushroom
(Post 1595921)
Oh give it a rest. I was a no vote and even I say that it wasn't really a concession. It wasn't a large pay increase, which is what we should have had. But to apologize to envoy for what? For putting a hand full if plane in a base for AA? Eagle held strong, good for them. When we get to vote again we should not take anything less than a 10% raise either. But I'm not going to apologize for doing well and succeeding.
I was a no vote because I understand the numbers and the numbers told me we did not in any way get a raise. Why did you vote no? Pay increase, C'mon, what pay increase? We took concessions, Do you mean that the pay raise was the "make you believe we giving you something" medical pay and more for the uniform and 3 minutes more while they raise the reserve to 76, did not re-negotiate the 1% cola and are paying the raise for the bro with savings in training due to new seat locks? The company saved money on this last package. 1% cola that was not re-negotiated for the pilot group would have cost the company more than the symbolic bs we got. The company played the game well outsmarted the pilot group and used SAPA as help....... |
Herman what exactly are you sorry about? At no point in the process of Envoy or ouselves at Skywest voting on TA's did we ever make less or undercut them in any way. We got a whopping 4 AC, if we get an actual RFP are you going to commit sepuku in protest?
BTW I voted no. |
Originally Posted by Stinsat7
(Post 1596062)
Herman what exactly are you sorry about? At no point in the process of Envoy or ouselves at Skywest voting on TA's did we ever make less or undercut them in any way. We got a whopping 4 AC, if we get an actual RFP are you going to commit sepuku in protest?
BTW I voted no. |
Originally Posted by JustAMushroom
(Post 1595921)
Oh give it a rest. I was a no vote and even I say that it wasn't really a concession. It wasn't a large pay increase, which is what we should have had. But to apologize to envoy for what? For putting a hand full if plane in a base for AA? Eagle held strong, good for them. When we get to vote again we should not take anything less than a 10% raise either. But I'm not going to apologize for doing well and succeeding.
Good luck at your non-owned subcontracting company. |
Originally Posted by HermannGraf
(Post 1596053)
Get of the Mushroom, lol
I was a no vote because I understand the numbers and the numbers told me we did not in any way get a raise. Why did you vote no? Pay increase, C'mon, what pay increase? We took concessions, Do you mean that the pay raise was the "make you believe we giving you something" medical pay and more for the uniform and 3 minutes more while they raise the reserve to 76, did not re-negotiate the 1% cola and are paying the raise for the bro with savings in training due to new seat locks? The company saved money on this last package. 1% cola that was not re-negotiated for the pilot group would have cost the company more than the symbolic bs we got. The company played the game well outsmarted the pilot group and used SAPA as help....... Yes, it should have been sent back. Yes SAPA should be reorganized. Do I feel bad for SkyWest growth? Not one bit. The only time We should balk at growth is if it was a direct result of shrinking a major. I don't wish any bad on any regional pilot group. Even Pinnacle or PSA. And any growth we achieve from their loss should come with a preferential interview. But do I think we should stop growth for their benefit? No. And I'm not going to apologize for that. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands