Search
Notices

Looking to the Future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2018, 01:44 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 34
Default I don't understand

I'm not trying to start something but what's the difference between the kid with 1,700TT and the military jet jockey with 1,700TT over the last 20 years?
Ivana Humpalot is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:04 PM
  #12  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default Looking to the Future

Originally Posted by Ivana Humpalot View Post
I'm not trying to start something but what's the difference between the kid with 1,700TT and the military jet jockey with 1,700TT over the last 20 years?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:08 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: FO
Posts: 435
Default

Originally Posted by Ivana Humpalot View Post
I'm not trying to start something but what's the difference between the kid with 1,700TT and the military jet jockey with 1,700TT over the last 20 years?
The dynamics and workload associated with the types of flying. The maturity level and cognitive function required to lead multiple aircraft into a combat situation, and deploying ordinance in close proximity to friendly forces demonstrates a higher level of proficiency than does landing a twin Cessna on a 8,000 Ft runway.

PS, I’m not a mil jet guy, I’m a former RW guy who has 1200 hours of flight time that most majors don’t even consider actual flight time.
slimothy is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:09 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: FO
Posts: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol

Filler
slimothy is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:20 PM
  #15  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,944
Default

Originally Posted by slimothy View Post
The dynamics and workload associated with the types of flying. The maturity level and cognitive function required to lead multiple aircraft into a combat situation, and deploying ordinance in close proximity to friendly forces demonstrates a higher level of proficiency than does landing a twin Cessna on a 8,000 Ft runway.

PS, I’m not a mil jet guy, I’m a former RW guy who has 1200 hours of flight time that most majors don’t even consider actual flight time.
Let’s see. Cessna on an 8,000 ft runway.

Being shot at. Then flying a jet and landing on a carrier. Having to catch a cable with a tail hook or go swimming.

Yeah, there is a bit of difference.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 02:37 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 139
Default

Because there is more airmanship in any one of the fighter guy’s hours than any 100 of the other guys.

Paging Wackmaster and his “but, but... we land at busy airports and stuff...”

To which any fighter dude that has flown in an LFE launch and recovery (which is almost all of them) just chuckles and says “that’s cute.”
Warhawg01 is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:34 PM
  #17  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default

Well... at least we all know what you Mil guys think of us now.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 04:22 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: FO
Posts: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post
Well... at least we all know what you Mil guys think of us now.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I don’t think I said anything disparaging about pure CIV flying, but you can hardly compare 1700 hours of flight instruction (I’d say typically almost all piston) to 1700 of F-whatever time. If somebody wants to do the math, subtract 150kts from the speed of sound, and there’s the big difference. And again, I’ve never flown any military jets, so I’m not bragging up my own experience here.
slimothy is offline  
Old 03-16-2018, 05:03 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,614
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawg01 View Post
Because there is more airmanship in any one of the fighter guy’s hours than any 100 of the other guys.
How does anything that a Weapons School grad F-teener does translate into 121 ops? Sorry bud, but quite a few F-teeners don't know sh!t from shinola in 121 ops and generally tend to have a much more difficult time transitioning than regional or even corporate guys, and yet everyone puts up with it. Sorry dude, no LFE launches, no ingress or egress routes here, no JTAC's, no SAM threats (usually), SEAD isn't necessary (unless maybe if landing on the south side at LAX), and the worst of it... we don't do 3-hour preflight briefs.

To which any fighter dude that has flown in an LFE launch and recovery (which is almost all of them) just chuckles and says “that’s cute.”
And that same dude is 'blind' before even pushing back here.

Congrats on getting off probation Warhawg, but humility goes a long way.
RJSAviator76 is online now  
Old 03-16-2018, 05:10 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Position: pj's and coffee
Posts: 228
Default

Well this thread went to sh!t in a hurry. This has been debated ad nauseum in 50 different places on APC. Move on.
GatorHog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
36
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices