Search

Notices

Looking to the Future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2018 | 01:52 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingPirate
Ok. I'll bite. I instructed for the premiere ab initio flight school in Europe for a few years, so here are my thoughts.

All of the pilots to through a very stringent selection process before being admitted to the flight schools (something the civilian side of flying neglects, unfortunately) then spend over a year in classrooms before touching an airplane. Then they would send them to the U.S. to complete primary flight training up through their multi commercial license. They would typically finish the program with just over 200 hours of flight time then proceed to new hire training at pretty much any European airline (Ryan Air, KLM, Lufthansa, Air Lingus, British Airways, you name it) flying an Airbus or Boeing. The airlines based much of who they hired on the student's training record among other things. The thing is... these guys were incredibly sharp and some of the best pilots I have ever seen, even at a the very elementary level I trained them at. I would put them up against 75% of the pilots at majors right now (both military and civilian trained); myself included.

I am all for ab initio training here in the U.S., I think it provides the best of both worlds; A very selective applicant pool and demanding training standards with a specific focus on airline ops.
When you think about it, UPT (Military pilot training) is somewhat of a "premier ab initio flight school" in it's own right. The soon to be military pilots also go through a stringent selection process. Then, after ground training and a couple hundred flying hours, military pilots (if they graduate) are then dispersed to learn to fly anything from F-15's B-2's, F-16's, C-5's, F-18's, KC-10's, KC-135's, etc. So in that respect, if it's vetted enough, I tend to agree and don't see why a true ab initio program couldn't work in the USA as well. However, not particularly pointing at you, but to compare a 2000 hour F-15 pilot with a 2000 hour civilian pilot is a completely different conversation.

Last edited by Burton78; 03-17-2018 at 02:19 AM.
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 03:36 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Burton78
When you think about it, UPT (Military pilot training) is somewhat of a "premier ab initio flight school" in it's own right. The soon to be military pilots also go through a stringent selection process. Then, after ground training and a couple hundred flying hours, military pilots (if they graduate) are then dispersed to learn to fly anything from F-15's B-2's, F-16's, C-5's, F-18's, KC-10's, KC-135's, etc. So in that respect, if it's vetted enough, I tend to agree and don't see why a true ab initio program couldn't work in the USA as well. However, not particularly pointing at you, but to compare a 2000 hour F-15 pilot with a 2000 hour civilian pilot is a completely different conversation.
Precisely my point.

Now to your second point: I would never put a 7000 he civilian pilot in a Fighter, Tanker, or some other C of F prefix aircraft and expect them to do better than a 500 hr military guy. They weren't trained for that type of flying; It's apples to oranges.
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 03:48 AM
  #33  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Doug Masters didn’t seem to have a problem going from a Cessna 150 to a Viper....
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 04:08 AM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Doug Masters didn’t seem to have a problem going from a Cessna 150 to a Viper....
😂

Post of the day...lol
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 04:15 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 274
From: B737CA
Default

One Vision, baby!

https://youtu.be/kvpsEKSNkkA
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 07:18 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

All it takes to fly a Viper well is 80’s rock music on a cassette player. All it takes to fly 121 well is Barry Manilow over a Bluetooth Bose A20.
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 10:41 AM
  #37  
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Doug Masters didn’t seem to have a problem going from a Cessna 150 to a Viper....
LOL, it was only a matter of time. Well played sir.
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 02:13 PM
  #38  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,950
Likes: 110
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by Psycho18th
All it takes to fly a Viper well is 80’s rock music on a cassette player. All it takes to fly 121 well is Barry Manilow over a Bluetooth Bose A20.

At the Copa....Copa Cabana...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 02:21 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 401
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
but humility goes a long way.
Yes it does RJSAviator, it does indeed.
Reply
Old 03-17-2018 | 03:19 PM
  #40  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default curious

How many hours do MIL pilots fly per month. If the pilot was in the service for 10 years and has 1,700 hours that works out to 170 hours per year or 14 hours a month. That's probably less than a Doctor flying his Bonanza and we all know how that ends. The MIL guys are great at PAR approaches but how about an ADF, or holding?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
37
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices