Search

Notices

SWA leaving Newark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2019 | 01:21 PM
  #11  
Swimmin' in da pool
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer
https://www.airliners.net/forum/view...2069&start=200 go down to post 246. According to this (and some other places I've read but don't have the sources handy), UAL didn't buy these planes to deny them from SWA, but are actually getting them from SWA (GECAS owns them but leased them to SWA, and as part of SWAs -700 early retirement while moving to the MAX they made a deal to retire them and pass them back to GECAS and on to UAL). Also, supposedly this deal isn't new and was in the works a while ago (at least on the SWA end), and just so happens to work out well for UAL...not so much for SWA (if it is accurate).

Supposedly this is when the decision was made to park some of those 700s.
https://leehamnews.com/2018/04/30/so...0-retirements/ https://simpleflying.com/southwest-737-retirement/

Related, today SWA says they are delaying some -700 early retirements, so they got that going for them. https://centreforaviation.com/news/s...ircraft-924415
Thanks man, good info.
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 04:51 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 293
Default

Originally Posted by SINCE
Pulling out of part of the largest market in the USA for one.

Capitulating a chunk of business because of the Max disaster two (as the article states). It’s a shame SW has to do something akin to shrinking to profitability over this.

It will add to the public’s negative perception of the Max if the country’s largest operator of it states they are pulling out of markets because of it.

And (I’ll admit this is selfish) SW is on my radar and EWR is my home airport, so commuting would see limits.

I have to hope the situation will all reverse itself sooner than later. Who knows
In general management will use any excuse necessary to tuck and run other than they can't make it work business wise. So the max is the fall guy on this but most likely UAL was just super competitive on those routes for too long and SWA blinked first being it was a United hub.
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
The planes UA got were SW planes. They were too expensive mix wise to keep. It sucks pulling out of a market but they will focus those planes on more profitable routes and fill the NY gap using LGA where we got more gates.
Management doesn't share their strategy with us who knows what their plan is but I'm sure they have a room full of people thinking stuff up and then a room of people backing them up. Plus our amazing F-teen guys backing them up.
LGA is slot restricted... having more gates means absolutely nothing. EWR is not slot restricted but gate constrained. I'm shocked to see SWA give up Newark.
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 08:14 PM
  #14  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

20K flights get xcld in 2nd qtr alone because of the MAX. Think WN will be shopping for another type ASAP?
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 08:58 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by lavService
LGA is slot restricted... having more gates means absolutely nothing. EWR is not slot restricted but gate constrained. I'm shocked to see SWA give up Newark.
For years SWA made millions serving NYC only from ISP.

SWA retreated from SFO before, ultimately to return.

Funny nobody seemed to care when SWA pulled out of DAY last year....
Reply
Old 07-26-2019 | 11:53 PM
  #16  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 283
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by trip
20K flights get xcld in 2nd qtr alone because of the MAX. Think WN will be shopping for another type ASAP?
Um.....NOPE! Not under the current senior level management. That’s an accepted fact around this place.
Reply
Old 07-27-2019 | 09:11 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Probably more a financial decision than a Max issue. We should have 60 Max planes in operation by Oct. So sure, when nearly 10% of your fleet is parked in a parking lot in a political hit job you have to do what you can to keep the rest of the operation flowing. So mgt prob looked and saw EWR as something they could sacrifice due to poor financial numbers.

Also allows those planes to be redeployed to more lucrative markets like HI, etc.

346 fatalities. You're delusional.
Reply
Old 07-27-2019 | 09:46 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 753
Likes: 206
Default

Originally Posted by RustyChain
346 fatalities. You're delusional.
... or has a broader understanding...
Reply
Old 07-27-2019 | 10:01 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RustyChain
346 fatalities. You're delusional.
Haha, everything is a political hit job or government conspiracy if you watch Infowars. I wouldn't even try to argue, these people will always whip out "deeper understanding" or "you're ignorant and naive" argument.
Reply
Old 07-27-2019 | 10:20 AM
  #20  
ROFF's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 460
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by RustyChain
346 fatalities. You're delusional.
You really think the world aviation industry has banned together to ground an industry/American/political giant for the sake of 346 fatalities?

That many people will die this weekend on US roads alone.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
candlerman
Southwest
12
02-23-2012 05:35 PM
I_Love_Lamp
Major
103
03-29-2010 06:57 PM
EWRflyr
Major
21
12-02-2009 04:00 PM
Metal121
Major
84
07-08-2007 04:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices