1000 Turbine rule abolished
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,619
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
#22
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2021
Posts: 32
I wonder if doctors sit around thinking about how they could lower the qualifications so that more people could become doctors more quickly? Why are pilots in particular so eager to lower the barriers to entry?
In short, no. I don’t see any good reason for WN to recruit and hire 1500TT/500ME pilots. Just my opinion though. That and $5 will buy you a latte at Starbucks.
In short, no. I don’t see any good reason for WN to recruit and hire 1500TT/500ME pilots. Just my opinion though. That and $5 will buy you a latte at Starbucks.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,464
All the D225 pilots are required to get turbine time at a fractional/feeder job. I saw that post too, and it was started when the assistant to the regional manager came over to the CQT class on a Sunday when nobody else could make it to do the company brief.
It's like when you fly with a check airman and they tell you that we are updating our training programs for the 787. Mmmmkay.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,464
Simply put, there is no substitute for experience. 10,000 hour me is a way better pilot than 1,000 hour me. The thought is that odds are you are going to see and do stuff in those thousands of hours that is going to scare you enough and teach you enough lessons that you are going to be a better pilot going forward.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
#25
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 194
Simply put, there is no substitute for experience. 10,000 hour me is a way better pilot than 1,000 hour me. The thought is that odds are you are going to see and do stuff in those thousands of hours that is going to scare you enough and teach you enough lessons that you are going to be a better pilot going forward.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
I’ll be starting at a legacy carrier in a few weeks. I understand some will have an easier path to gain a seniority number at a Major than I did, this isn’t jealousy, it’s just a fact that experience does matter and Southwest blowing up the 1,000 turbine mins and hiring 1,500 CFI’s would be dangerous to all your careers at SWA. All it takes is one major accident.
Here’s a better idea, how about instead of reducing hiring minimus they make SWA a career destination again. This is coming from someone who received a CJO and lives in a SWA base but accepted another offer.
Last edited by Str8 Cash Homie; 11-29-2022 at 07:20 AM.
#26
1000 Turbine rule abolished
Simply put, there is no substitute for experience. 10,000 hour me is a way better pilot than 1,000 hour me. The thought is that odds are you are going to see and do stuff in those thousands of hours that is going to scare you enough and teach you enough lessons that you are going to be a better pilot going forward.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
This. The whole world operates on this master and apprentice type system where there’s really only one pilot on the airplane, and one student pilot. Except the US. Everyone is Captain qualified on day one. That’s something we should be proud of, not looking for excuses to reduce or eliminate.
Sure the Europeans can sit down and watch the white triangle eat the pink line all the way across the Atlantic and then make one landing a week. 999 times out of 1000 it’ll be just that easy. The 1000th time it’s AirFrance 447, or Malaysian 370, Ethiopian 302.
Germanwings 9525 is another one to take a look at though. The FO had 630 hours. If he had more time in the profession, maybe flight instructors, or examiners, or controllers, or coworkers might have started to see a trend in his behavior, his mental state and thrown the flag before 149 people had to die. Taking a low time pilot and having them warm the right seat is asking for trouble. Do we want the FO position to be an apprenticeship? Or do we want FOs who come with the experience and the airmanship to be an active and participatory member of a crew when the poo hits the fan?
#27
Not at SWA, but I never understood the mindset of the Airlines that helo time doesn't count for jack, while Cessna 150 hours do. Seriously, my 60ish hours in a 150/152 getting a PPL and renting a plane to sightsee counted more than all my hours the Bell JetRanger, Huey, H-3, H-60 and H-53 combined. Some serious speed that Cezzna moves with.
I have significant helicopter time, north of 4000 hours. None of it counted for SWA, Delta, FedEx, etc but I had classmates at Delta whose hours instructing in Single Engine Piston all counted, but my thousands of hours flying a twin turbine, 22,000 pound helicopter in all sort of conditions didn't.
But what do I know, I'm just an airline pilot.
I have significant helicopter time, north of 4000 hours. None of it counted for SWA, Delta, FedEx, etc but I had classmates at Delta whose hours instructing in Single Engine Piston all counted, but my thousands of hours flying a twin turbine, 22,000 pound helicopter in all sort of conditions didn't.
But what do I know, I'm just an airline pilot.
#28
The freight dawgs are seldom caught with their pants down on anything. I always liked hearing "I was with (name your freight company) flying a Beech 99". I then knew this guy had lousy radar, engine problems, propeller problems, diversions, lots of hand flying, lots of real IFR, and had to make a lot of decisions.
But I can't tell you how many "fast track" FOs I have had at regionals who had springs fly out of their heads every time a Master Warning or go-around came up.
At NJA, I was happy that we had pretty stringent mins at 2500TT/1000ME and some turbine preferred (although they recently dropped them well since I left). Because they already had a good handle on flying in general, the FOs there were pretty sharp. Couple that with the long road to upgrade they had a lot of experience, and I was quite comfortable flying with all of them.
And while I don't consider myself a "high timer", I have enough type ratings and time to be considered well qualified when I applied at SWA....and even at that, hitting the line was a blur and the first few flights from PHX to SAN, LAS and the other "short" flights, man I barely looked outside. I can't imagine bringing people with no turbine in here. Now before I start hearing "well, the low timers get through training so they must be pretty good" and other nonsensical arguments, I'll liken sim training to be like having sex with a blow-up doll....it just aint the real thing. I'm really not an arrogant man, at all, but this is high stakes gambling and I'd rather be paired with someone who has played cards a lot than a guy who read lots of books about it and played a few games of 21.
This is not at all about "paying your dues", its about being ready.
Last edited by tm602; 11-29-2022 at 08:46 AM.
#29
Dude, the fatality rate would thin the ranks of available pilots even worse than it is now LOL.
The freight dawgs are seldom caught with their pants down on anything. But I can't tell you how many "fast track" FOs I have had at regionals who had springs fly out of their heads every time a Master Warning or go-around came up.
The freight dawgs are seldom caught with their pants down on anything. But I can't tell you how many "fast track" FOs I have had at regionals who had springs fly out of their heads every time a Master Warning or go-around came up.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 304
Simply put, there is no substitute for experience. 10,000 hour me is a way better pilot than 1,000 hour me. The thought is that odds are you are going to see and do stuff in those thousands of hours that is going to scare you enough and teach you enough lessons that you are going to be a better pilot going forward.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
If you were doing the hiring, would you rather that person gain that experience here with your pax in the back or would you rather they do it somewhere else? Turbine experience is valuable. Period. Turbine aircraft go faster and higher, carry more stuff, and have issues with spool up times and performance that piston aircraft don't. You want a pilot that already has that experience and isn't learning it in the training center and on the line.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post