![]() |
Originally Posted by flyguy81
(Post 3971098)
Nobody would buy a brand new sports car that has been sitting on the lot for 7 years.
|
Originally Posted by Liberty
(Post 3971109)
…or that says Miata on it! Because nobody wants an old, new plane and nobody wants girls to tell them their car is so cute.
”You watch your ass!” |
Originally Posted by Liberty
(Post 3971109)
…or that says Miata on it! Because nobody wants an old, new plane and nobody wants girls to tell them their car is so cute.
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 3971116)
Cue Mel Brooks in Blazing Saddles:
”You watch your ass!” |
Originally Posted by Salukidawg
(Post 3971227)
^^^^^What Whack said. I guess I have a thing for girl cars. As for the MAX7’s that are already built. I would guess that the company wants them because we need airframes and it allows for them to retire more -700’s while replacing them with similar sized aircraft. I’m sure Boeing has already or is going to be compensating the company for taking 7 year old frames for the shorter service life.
|
Originally Posted by REF 5
(Post 3971257)
Just as SWA did with the RTS of the Max 8, all those Max 7's( I think 26) that are built, SWA won't be touching those for quite a while. Tech has already stated that those will be the last to get on line. All those 8's that are on order will just be converted to 7's since it's on the same assembly line. If the 7 gets its airworthy in late 2026, I can see in 2027-2028, SWA pretty much getting 90% Max 7's in the deliveries. I don't know what the cost is but I bet you it's in the Billions keeping those 700's around vs the Max 7, which should have been on the property almost 10 years ago. I just hope the economics of the airplane are as advertised. If it is, it will be a big benefit to SWA no doubt. SWA average stage length is still less than 800 miles. Many city pairs that need that airplane to balance capacity at the operating cost of that airplane.
This company needs a smaller gauge aircraft in a big way. The E2 is the belle of the ball all the sudden since Alaska will have to replace their 717s. Be interesting to see if SWA takes the plunge or lets another one get away. |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3971394)
150 seats is still a pretty big aircraft. The word from the airline CEO gripe podcasts is that GTF engines so far have been about a break even when it comes to economy vs maint cost/time off wing. Take it with a grain of salt since they negotiate engine leases and have to deal with the finicky Pratt engines too, but I am sure where there is smoke there's fire.
This company needs a smaller gauge aircraft in a big way. The E2 is the belle of the ball all the sudden since Alaska will have to replace their 717s. Be interesting to see if SWA takes the plunge or lets another one get away. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3971403)
They’ll pressure Boeing to design the Max6.😂😂😂
it would be glorious |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3971394)
150 seats is still a pretty big aircraft. The word from the airline CEO gripe podcasts is that GTF engines so far have been about a break even when it comes to economy vs maint cost/time off wing. Take it with a grain of salt since they negotiate engine leases and have to deal with the finicky Pratt engines too, but I am sure where there is smoke there's fire.
This company needs a smaller gauge aircraft in a big way. The E2 is the belle of the ball all the sudden since Alaska will have to replace their 717s. Be interesting to see if SWA takes the plunge or lets another one get away. |
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands