![]() |
Originally Posted by Liberty
(Post 4004542)
Hiring does that. It’s already happening. MAX7 will replace 700s. Don’t see replacements driving more hiring numbers. Rumors are current hiring extends through next year also. We’ll see. Either way, what you’re asking for is currently happening without the MAX 7.
|
Believe it or not, airplanes don’t drive hiring. CBA limits how many work days are built into the lines. That’s the main driver. Number two is max block hours that allowed to be built into the lines. Those two drive hiring. SWA of the old used have a pure am/pm duty day for the airplane. SWA of today has way too many airplanes that run beyond the duty limitations of 117(red eyes, trans con, etc). You can have one airplane have four crews in 24hr period just due to the stage length. Netting airplanes definitely helps though. Delivery of 66 and retiring of 60 in 2026. That excludes the Max7. Rumor is 4 deliveries slated in DEC for the Max 7 is in Boeings delivery schedule. Another rumor is Boeing has made a sweet deal to SWA to take all those parked Max 7’s. I think 26 are built. Initially, SWA said no but Boeing made a deal they couldn’t refuse.
|
Originally Posted by REF 5
(Post 4004552)
Believe it or not, airplanes don’t drive hiring. CBA limits how many work days are built into the lines. That’s the main driver. Number two is max block hours that allowed to be built into the lines. Those two drive hiring. SWA of the old used have a pure am/pm duty day for the airplane. SWA of today has way too many airplanes that run beyond the duty limitations of 117(red eyes, trans con, etc). You can have one airplane have four crews in 24hr period just due to the stage length. Netting airplanes definitely helps though. Delivery of 66 and retiring of 60 in 2026. That excludes the Max7. Rumor is 4 deliveries slated in DEC for the Max 7 is in Boeings delivery schedule. Another rumor is Boeing has made a sweet deal to SWA to take all those parked Max 7’s. I think 26 are built. Initially, SWA said no but Boeing made a deal they couldn’t refuse.
IF 26 max 7 hit late this yr of early next that could mean some decent hiring at the trail end of the yr. Just in time to open another base and staff it with DEN pilots |
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 4004590)
I heard that also. Boeing will do all the checks etc to get them into service and whatever mx needed for xx time thereafter.
IF 26 max 7 hit late this yr of early next that could mean some decent hiring at the trail end of the yr. Just in time to open another base and staff it with DEN pilots |
Originally Posted by Reroutetommy
(Post 4004536)
Do you think the intro of the MAX 7, if it ever shows its face will speed things up a bit? Quicker upgrade times, less stagnant seniority?
|
Originally Posted by CaptTX
(Post 4004755)
The MAX 7 doesn't equate to growth anymore, only as a 1:1 replacement for 700s. The MAX 8s will help us grow.
|
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4004838)
Have to agree here. The 700s are in dire need of replacement. They will be 1 for 1 for quite a while and then once the 700s are gone, they will probably right size gauge by retiring/selling 800s. The company can’t wait to get that 700 albatross from around their necks. Those planes are all extremely high cycle and, even though they have done heavy checks, you can easily tell that they are just riding them into the dirt and not doing a lot in the way of upkeep. I swear I am calling mx on about every 5th leg in one.
They might keep them longer than we think |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4004838)
Have to agree here. The 700s are in dire need of replacement. They will be 1 for 1 for quite a while and then once the 700s are gone, they will probably right size gauge by retiring/selling 800s. The company can’t wait to get that 700 albatross from around their necks. Those planes are all extremely high cycle and, even though they have done heavy checks, you can easily tell that they are just riding them into the dirt and not doing a lot in the way of upkeep. I swear I am calling mx on about every 5th leg in one.
|
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 4004840)
idk the company wanted to fly the 300s and the max at the same time beofre the FAA said no.
They might keep them longer than we think |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4004838)
Have to agree here. The 700s are in dire need of replacement. They will be 1 for 1 for quite a while and then once the 700s are gone, they will probably right size gauge by retiring/selling 800s. The company can’t wait to get that 700 albatross from around their necks. Those planes are all extremely high cycle and, even though they have done heavy checks, you can easily tell that they are just riding them into the dirt and not doing a lot in the way of upkeep. I swear I am calling mx on about every 5th leg in one.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands