Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Leading Edge Financial Planning? >

Leading Edge Financial Planning?

Search
Notices

Leading Edge Financial Planning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2024, 04:35 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 101
Default

hahah yea great pilots helping pilots with money
6packSteamJedi is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 03:33 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,119
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post


Over the long run they have only managed to outperform the target-date fund by 0.8%, and that's after accounting for the cost of their advisory fees. However, that small outperformance ignores the future anticipated returns of the PE investments we have, which we hope to return in the 10-15% range. And last year, for example, our private credit investments outperformed the public bond markets by a substantial margin. So I fully expect that in the longer term, the effect of the private investments will significantly improve our returns.

Great perspective.

What is your advisor's minimum for the PE deals? Half a mil? 1 mil?

.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 04:19 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,858
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna View Post
Great perspective.

What is your advisor's minimum for the PE deals? Half a mil? 1 mil?

.
PE and PC (private credit) have two types of commitments: an upfront commitment (funds they need right now to get you started), plus a total commitment that will be 'called' within the first 1-3 years of investmnent. It usually takes a couple years for the full commitment to be fully realized (especially in PE) because the PE firms first raise their capital, and then begin their search for companies to acquire. Thus, they don't need the full value of your total investment to be sent to them immediately; they will take an upfront investment and then issue 'capital calls' periodically, as they begin to acquire target companies.

In other words, you're saying, "OK, I am going to commit to $750K total" (or whatever total you're OK with). They then will ask for, say, $200K upfront and then over the next 12-24 months there will be capital calls in tranches which you must fund. In other words you don't need all $750K now...you fund the commitment with $200K, and then every so often, you're asked for more funds until the full commitment is met.

IIRC this takes much longer with PE than with PC.

The big drawback with PE is the long return horizon. Years 1-2 are spent identifying target companies for acquisition or investment, and executing those transactions. Years 3-7 are spent transforming those companies to generate more value. Then the 'harvesting' in years 8-10 are when you see returns. For the first few years, the value of your investment is reported as flat. Then -- hopefully -- you see some significantly high returns. PC sees returns mucn more quickly because your money is invested and then almost immediately lent out in the private credit markets.

I've also experienced how PE works on the other side — i.e. how PE companies go about investing, acquiring, transforming, and then divesting companies that they target as opportunities.

We invested in a series of different PE funds that, in earlier 'vintages' run by the same firms, ended up with IRRs in the 20-25% range. We are only 3 years in to this round so I haven't a clue how things will turn out.

I believe the minimum investment IIRC was $500K.

Again, PE and PC are absolutely not for everyone. I would say that only a small percentage of investors with unique needs should consider them. For example, you need to be able to not touch PE money for almost a decade. And the risks are higher than traditional equities or bond investments. For these reasons, you don't see the Fidelities or Schwabs of this world offering these investment options. Will it prove to be a wise decision for me and my family? Time will tell...
Turbosina is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 05:44 PM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Swagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Position: On a Wing and a Prayer
Posts: 3
Default

Every investor/family is different. Risk/investment horizon/etc. Low cost index fund works for most families up to middle class. Above that, you might be able to afford more risk due to increased assets. Accredited investors are able to tap into unique markets as well. Along with unique risks. Extremely high wealth individuals can dabble in commercial paper (short term notes to companies to deal with short term debt/liabilities).

Any company/advisor you go with do your research. Everyone has to register these days. There are also advisors/CFPs that will do a 30-45 minute initial consult for like $200-$250 without a long-term committment.

Investor background check: https://brokercheck.finra.org
Certified financial planner: https://www.letsmakeaplan.org

A good financial advisor is like home renovations. Yes, you could do it all yourself and do a decent job but an expert just makes things so much easier.
Swagabond is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 06:03 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,464
Default

The target date funds have been terrible since the bond market took a complete dump post Great Recession and never really recovered. They have been a sucker bet and continue to be so. Comparing your funds' return to the target date funds is a bad comparison. You can realize much greater returns with a similar risk level by doing a little research and then safely investing your money in low cost index funds that match your tolerance for market swings. Hell, I have a good portion of my 401k in a money market right now and it is outperforming a lot of the bond funds.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 08:40 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,119
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot View Post
The target date funds have been terrible since the bond market took a complete dump post Great Recession and never really recovered.

Yep.... ran my bond allocation to 0% awhile ago

.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 11:48 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,858
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot View Post
The target date funds have been terrible since the bond market took a complete dump post Great Recession and never really recovered.
Yeah, the bond market in 2022 had its worst perfomance in 50 years. 2023 was a lot better though.


Originally Posted by e6bpilot View Post
Comparing your funds' return to the target date funds is a bad comparison.
Well, it's not like that was the only comparison we made. We also do compare our funds' returns to typical index funds. I find the target-date fund comparison useful because it answers the question, "If we had decided to take a completely hands-off approach to investing, we likely would have just put our money in a target-date fund. Had we done so, what would our returns have been?"

The next level up from that, in terms of investor involvement, would indeed be what you suggest: picking a mix of low-cost index funds and adjusting their allocations quarterly or annually so as to rebalance one's allocations against different investment types. We could have done that hypothetical exercise and compared the returns to our actual managed funds' returns. I just didn't really have the time to do that, but we do see our performance vs. typical indices, so the data is there.

All the data I've seen, though, tells me that for the average investor, engaging an investment advisor to actively manage their investments, generally doesn't mean they will outperform indices in the long run. Where I do think advisors can be useful is in talking you off the ledge when you're tempted to make an emotional decision based on perceived risk. For example, around this time last year, the Federal gov't was very close to defaulting on the national debt, which would have likely sent markets into complete chaos. I asked our advisors to draw up a hedging plan against this possibility, which seemed quite strong at the time. They drew up the plan, but strongly advised me to do nothing. As it turned out, they were right. Had I taken the hedge, or worse yet, had I significantly moved into cash, I would have missed most of the 2023 gains the market eventually made. So I do think advisors can have a very positive impact on some investors' outcomes. Again though, I agree that the average investor will do just fine by simply investing in a balanced mix of low-cost index funds. No argument there...
Turbosina is offline  
Old 02-16-2024, 07:24 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,464
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Yeah, the bond market in 2022 had its worst perfomance in 50 years. 2023 was a lot better though.




Well, it's not like that was the only comparison we made. We also do compare our funds' returns to typical index funds. I find the target-date fund comparison useful because it answers the question, "If we had decided to take a completely hands-off approach to investing, we likely would have just put our money in a target-date fund. Had we done so, what would our returns have been?"

The next level up from that, in terms of investor involvement, would indeed be what you suggest: picking a mix of low-cost index funds and adjusting their allocations quarterly or annually so as to rebalance one's allocations against different investment types. We could have done that hypothetical exercise and compared the returns to our actual managed funds' returns. I just didn't really have the time to do that, but we do see our performance vs. typical indices, so the data is there.

All the data I've seen, though, tells me that for the average investor, engaging an investment advisor to actively manage their investments, generally doesn't mean they will outperform indices in the long run. Where I do think advisors can be useful is in talking you off the ledge when you're tempted to make an emotional decision based on perceived risk. For example, around this time last year, the Federal gov't was very close to defaulting on the national debt, which would have likely sent markets into complete chaos. I asked our advisors to draw up a hedging plan against this possibility, which seemed quite strong at the time. They drew up the plan, but strongly advised me to do nothing. As it turned out, they were right. Had I taken the hedge, or worse yet, had I significantly moved into cash, I would have missed most of the 2023 gains the market eventually made. So I do think advisors can have a very positive impact on some investors' outcomes. Again though, I agree that the average investor will do just fine by simply investing in a balanced mix of low-cost index funds. No argument there...
True to what you said above about making dumb decisions. I know I could have used some good advice early on when picking stocks in my PCRA. Over time, I realized I was getting killed by the market, so why bother? For every ace that I made, I was taking it in the shorts on another pick. Finally, I have just about wrapped it up with the exception of a few very long term individual stocks. For the most part, I am all in on market based low cost funds with my "safe money" in interest bearing money market accounts and am satisfied with that result. I change the mix around a few times a year, but nothing drastic. Glad I bailed from the target date funds early on, though. They are ok, but since every single metric is outperforming them right now, they just haven't been a good performer for those that hold them over the last decade or so.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 02-16-2024, 09:53 AM
  #19  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,970
Default

Yeah, the bond market in 2022 had its worst perfomance in 50 years. 2023 was a lot better though.

Yes, interest rates went up in 2022. Bond prices went down. 2023 they stablized. When interest rates go down, in the future, bond prices will go up. Funny how that works.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 02-19-2024, 11:12 PM
  #20  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post
Any of you guys ever use Leading Edge Financial Planning? Someone sent me a link to their podcast on what to do with the retro check and I’m thinking of giving them a call. I guess the guy was a SWA pilot for 15 years and took the VSP to do this full time during the pandemic. Just curious if you’ve heard good, bad, or nothing at all.
Long time lurker, don’t post really at all. Nonetheless, IRT your question give them a call. They set up an hour or so chat to discuss what you want via zoom. You can outline your goals, they have a brief survey, and zero pressure to commit to anything. I still haven’t pulled the trigger, but read all their disclosures and did my research. They also have a tax pro on hand to assist, as well as contacts for estate planning. Lastly, they’re fiduciary so their interest is you vice commission. They charge a scalable rate based on amount they manage. I’m stubborn and want to maintain ‘control’ in the financial direction I want to peruse long-term, but, I also value the professional perspective and back up.
Roger Hawters is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A320fan
Money Talk
4
07-18-2008 12:39 PM
Vman
Money Talk
1
01-28-2008 11:18 AM
8Lpearlchannel
Regional
20
11-27-2007 04:13 AM
SWAjet
Money Talk
12
12-10-2006 02:24 PM
buffalopilot
Regional
13
11-20-2006 11:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices