![]() |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3928120)
EARLIEST upgrade, not average
I already commute, so earliest available was a no brainer to me. If I lived in base, I wouldn't commute to upgrade any longer than a few months. Other than that, it's totally worth it for the mental health break if nothing else. |
Nothing against the D225 hires personally, but I find it ridiculous that they are the only people that Dallas will bring on board right now. Southwest won’t even give the time of day to military aviators or anyone else with tons of experience. Now will Dallas bring on board the 300 people they already gave CJOs too. Instead, their only interest is people with the absolute minimum experience. They could at least split it 50/50 with D225 and those with much higher experience levels.
|
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 3928033)
nobody liked it back in the 90's when simulator evaluations were a part of every interview. Nothing more stressful than hand flying an airplane you've never flown when a job was on the line. But in retrospect, I see the value in not investing in someone who doesn't have basic attitude instrument flying skills. Other than America West's unique profile, most of these were one or two steep turns, an ILS and a miss to a hold. Not really rocket surgery stuff.
I'd like to see that come back again, especially if we are committed to hiring pilots with limited experience. Maybe SWA should bring back the type requirement because at least then you know that they can fly a 737. |
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 3928033)
nobody liked it back in the 90's when simulator evaluations were a part of every interview. Nothing more stressful than hand flying an airplane you've never flown when a job was on the line. But in retrospect, I see the value in not investing in someone who doesn't have basic attitude instrument flying skills. Other than America West's unique profile, most of these were one or two steep turns, an ILS and a miss to a hold. Not really rocket surgery stuff.
I'd like to see that come back again, especially if we are committed to hiring pilots with limited experience. |
Originally Posted by 123AB
(Post 3928241)
Nothing against the D225 hires personally, but I find it ridiculous that they are the only people that Dallas will bring on board right now. Southwest won’t even give the time of day to military aviators or anyone else with tons of experience. Now will Dallas bring on board the 300 people they already gave CJOs too. Instead, their only interest is people with the absolute minimum experience. They could at least split it 50/50 with D225 and those with much higher experience levels.
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 3928251)
Amen. I never understood the sim evals going away. If you’re interviewing pilots, why not check their basic flying skills? You know…..that thing you’re actually hiring them to do.
|
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3928292)
I really haven't run into basic stick and rudder being the issue at all. The very few weak pilots that I have flown with have either been captains who do weird, nonstandard stuff or FOs who don't have the requisite judgment and experience level coupled with a lack of self awareness that they are lacking in that department. They are certainly the exception and not the rule. I can generally work with the latter, the former are pretty much beyond saving.
Anyone remember the American Eagle Astronaut Interview back in 1999? There was a tech panel which quizzed charts etc, a cognitive skills computer test, an HR panel and then a sim eval in a KC-135 sim! We had some time to memorize the list of callouts they had and then did the profile. For me it was intimidating but I got the job—pending the astronaut physical after that! |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3928292)
I really haven't run into basic stick and rudder being the issue at all. The very few weak pilots that I have flown with have either been captains who do weird, nonstandard stuff or FOs who don't have the requisite judgment and experience level coupled with a lack of self awareness that they are lacking in that department. They are certainly the exception and not the rule. I can generally work with the latter, the former are pretty much beyond saving.
Now the 8-year organic hires who've completely checked out? That's a whole other story. I just hope I never came off that way before I went back to Dallas. |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3928292)
I really haven't run into basic stick and rudder being the issue at all. The very few weak pilots that I have flown with have either been captains who do weird, nonstandard stuff or FOs who don't have the requisite judgment and experience level coupled with a lack of self awareness that they are lacking in that department. They are certainly the exception and not the rule. I can generally work with the latter, the former are pretty much beyond saving.
|
Originally Posted by Fuseplug
(Post 3928330)
Now the 8-year organic hires who've completely checked out? That's a whole other story. I just hope I never came off that way before I went back to Dallas.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands