Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal >

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Search
Notices

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2011, 02:43 PM
  #581  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
I am not trying to cast the AT folks in an unflattering way with this statement, but simply trying to refute what you say on an equipment level. I assure you I in no way feel "superior" to any pilot no matter what equipment they fly, we all do exactly the same job for goodness sake. I am making these statements only to point out that I do not agree with your logic. Alluding that this is different because it contains differing pieces of equipment is ludicrous. Many AT pilots made their choice to go to AT just as I made my choice to leave the top 10% of a regional airline to move to the bottom of the SWA list. I don't fault them for the choices they made and I expect that they don't fault mine. The fact is we both chose to go to two very different airlines. The 717 is 60% of their fleet. Boeing simply disagrees with your statement.

Boeing Introduces 717-200 Airplane as New Regional Jet



SEATTLE, Jan. 08, 1998 -- The Boeing Company today introduced and renamed the newest member of its commercial airplane family -- the Boeing 717-200 twinjet.
"The 717-200 is uniquely qualified to meet the evolving requirements of the new regional jetliner market," said Ron Woodard, president, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. "It's a 100-seat airplane market that demands comfort, low operating costs and high schedule reliability. This is the plane to meet that need."


Boeing: Boeing Introduces 717-200 Airplane as New Regional Jet
The regional flying that you think is so "comical" for us to want to take back is what was outsourced years ago or stolen during bankruptcy.

It is currently operated by contracted carriers for companies that in many cases do not much more than supply the pilots, flight attendants, and maintenance.

Now you go so far as to compare the AirTran guys to outsourced, contracted regional jobs? That's comical! There is no logical comparison no matter how much you want there to be one.

FYI- the CRJ-900's that are outsourced are 76 seats.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 02:52 PM
  #582  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
The regional flying that you think is so "comical" for us to want to take back is what was outsourced years ago or stolen during bankruptcy.

It is currently operated by contracted carriers for companies that in many cases do not much more than supply the pilots, flight attendants, and maintenance.

Now you go so far as to compare the AirTran guys to outsourced, contracted regional jobs? That's comical! There is no logical comparison no matter how much you want there to be one.

FYI- the CRJ-900's that are outsourced are 76 seats.
What I find comical is the hypocrisy. I never made any statements that said AT were outsourced regional jobs, I am simply pointing out the similarities to some of the equipment AT operates to the Delta Connection equipment that you claim is so different. FYI- the CRJ-900's that are outsourced are certificated as 90 seaters and Delta pulls out 14 of them to remain within scope limitations, just as NW did with the Avro.
shoelu is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:51 PM
  #583  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

Did you just say I fly an RJ?

Huh? I checked the back of my license and it actually says I'm typed in the DC-9 (and the 737, but someone else paid for that, too).

So, using your logic (which I'm sure management would love you to continue to use), the 737-500 is an RJ also? Make sure to let management know during the next Section 6 negotiations that the only difference between a CRJ900 and a 737-800 is the number of seats installed.

Please, continue to base your arguments on press releases issued 13 years ago.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:21 PM
  #584  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
What I find comical is the hypocrisy. I never made any statements that said AT were outsourced regional jobs, I am simply pointing out the similarities to some of the equipment AT operates to the Delta Connection equipment that you claim is so different. FYI- the CRJ-900's that are outsourced are certificated as 90 seaters and Delta pulls out 14 of them to remain within scope limitations, just as NW did with the Avro.
Sometimes... words just don't say enough:

80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:40 PM
  #585  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

So do I understand this right, the Air Tran MEC will vote again tomorrow to determine if maybe just maybe they should let the pilots vote on this?
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 08:39 PM
  #586  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USN C9B's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: B717 FO
Posts: 210
Default

You are correct and since they were threatened that if they voted no again, they would be putting all AAI employees on the street. I think it will pass this time.
USN C9B is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 08:50 PM
  #587  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by USN C9B View Post
You are correct and since they were threatened that if they voted no again, they would be putting all AAI employees on the street. I think it will pass this time.
Nothing like "voting" with a gun to your head. Hey, it worked for Stalin and Hitler.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 01:59 AM
  #588  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

you guys are still going at it?
727C47 is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 03:18 AM
  #589  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

Yes. After AIP1 (Agreement in Principle 1) didn't make it past the ATN MEC, they negotiated another deal. The ATN MEC votes on it today at 10am.

Road shows start Friday. No idea when the membership vote starts.

We haven't seen the details, but it is generally thought AIP2 will be worse than AIP1.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 04:58 AM
  #590  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter View Post
Nothing like "voting" with a gun to your head. Hey, it worked for Stalin and Hitler.
And will for Lorenzo part 2. Sad
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
79
03-06-2011 07:31 AM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices