![]() |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2712133)
And no different airframes.
Why do you feel that way? If they got 330’s you’d be upset? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
(Post 2712280)
Why do you feel that way? If they got 330’s you’d be upset?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
(Post 2712280)
Why do you feel that way? If they got 330’s you’d be upset?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by SkyJunky
(Post 2709159)
I appreciate that. I really do want to be here. Its just gotta pencil out. Being an FO for 5+ years doesn't for my situation. Upgrading quickly is one of the paramount reasons, among many, that makes this place very attractive. I hope the rest of the applicants realize the potential slowing as well. I know quite a few that are banking on the fast upgrades. We all have to take a job for what it is, not what it 'could' be. To that, we are getting hired as FOs. Full spectrum, I, like most of us, set risk v reward, "is it worth it?". I want to believe it is. Plus, Spirit pilots are all pretty awesome guys. Work-life will at least be legit if upgrades slow way down.
|
Originally Posted by Super EZ E
(Post 2710996)
ACY guys would flood BWI. We have a lot of guys on the east coast that would love BWI. We need a lot more activity to make BWI a crew base. I don't see it anytime soon, You'd think ACY would close but we fill the aircraft.
"flood" a 250-300 pilot base (which is what bwi would be, look at MCO for a recent example of base size vs number of departures a day) with ACY is laughable. ACY is what... 80 pilots total? don't even both counting the bottm 20 fos. |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2714162)
"flood" a 250-300 pilot base (which is what bwi would be, look at MCO for a recent example of base size vs number of departures a day) with ACY is laughable. ACY is what... 80 pilots total? don't even both counting the bottm 20 fos.
As long as it is cheaper to have the crew base compared to the cost of overnighting a bunch of crews then it makes sense to have a base. No reason they can’t keep ACY and have BWI. ACY is kind of an outlier but those planes are always full whenever I fly into there. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
(Post 2714191)
As long as it is cheaper to have the crew base compared to the cost of overnighting a bunch of crews then it makes sense to have a base. No reason they can’t keep ACY and have BWI. ACY is kind of an outlier but those planes are always full whenever I fly into there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2714197)
they will keep both bases for sure. to say that ACY will close if BWI opens completely overlooks the fact that MCO didn't open by cannibalizing or closing FLL at all.
I bet the re surface project had a lot to do with the opening of MCO as a base. |
Originally Posted by Acehole
(Post 2714627)
I’m pretty sure when FLL closes the north runway, the flights out of there will slow to a crawl...
I bet the re surface project had a lot to do with the opening of MCO as a base. |
Originally Posted by Conquistador27
(Post 2714635)
So will Orlando close or pilots get displaced when the FLL runway reopens? It’s hard to believe we would have an entire new base that’s going to be pretty large because of a temporary runway closure.
|
Originally Posted by Acehole
(Post 2714627)
I’m pretty sure when FLL closes the north runway, the flights out of there will slow to a crawl...
I bet the re surface project had a lot to do with the opening of MCO as a base. Okie dokie bud, I guess nothing to do with the 30+ departures out of MCO and the 60+ rooms we pay for there every night. |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2714197)
they will keep both bases for sure. to say that ACY will close if BWI opens completely overlooks the fact that MCO didn't open by cannibalizing or closing FLL at all.
In the end, I dont think they open BWI or close ACY, for a while. Seems their goal right now is to staff MCO with 100% voluntary vacancies, with the help of vacancy bids, reductions in other bases without backfills, and PBS implementation here soon. If Bendo has to pay to move a pilot, he loses in his mind. |
Originally Posted by Ducttape
(Post 2714748)
If Bendo has to pay to move a pilot, he loses in his mind. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2709352)
A hand full of big bases is best for qol as opposed to a bunch of small ones. How much swapping to you think Allegiant pilots do? Basically zero. Like I tell my kids, you get what you get and you don’t get upset. Who wants that?
|
Originally Posted by ecam
(Post 2714781)
What are you basing this opinion on? We have swap boards and people swap constantly. We even have ho's who will commute across the country and get a hotel+rental car just to pick up a sweet trip out of base.
Don't call people who pick up open time trips Ho's :) Don't want to get the TRO opened again, or a new lawsuit. Management is watching :) |
Originally Posted by beech_nut
(Post 2714788)
Don't call people who pick up open time trips Ho's :) Don't want to get the TRO opened again, or a new lawsuit. Management is watching :)
|
Originally Posted by Acehole
(Post 2714627)
I’m pretty sure when FLL closes the north runway, the flights out of there will slow to a crawl...
I bet the re surface project had a lot to do with the opening of MCO as a base. |
Originally Posted by ecam
(Post 2714781)
What are you basing this opinion on? We have swap boards and people swap constantly. We even have ho's who will commute across the country and get a hotel+rental car just to pick up a sweet trip out of base.
|
Upgrade Time
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2714859)
Out of base is the key there. With a bunch of small bases you lose all flexibility in base. ACY is small and there is very little to swap with usually. Every time we open a new base we dilute the existing bases and lower flexibility as well as slow seniority movement in base. A handful of big bases throughout the country is best. A bunch of mini bases is terrible.
You’d be singing a different tune if you happened to live in one of these “mini bases” and were stuck commuting. I can see both sides of the argument though. Also who says that any of the new bases are going to be small, MCO could very well be bigger than Vegas or DFW when it’s all said and done. Same for BWI if that ever happens. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2714859)
Every time we open a new base we dilute the existing bases and lower flexibility as well as slow seniority movement in base. A handful of big bases throughout the country is best. A bunch of mini bases is terrible.
|
Originally Posted by ecam
(Post 2714792)
Lol. At allegiant we aren't negotiating and won't be for many years. And people who travel from Florida to Arizona to pick up a 200% 4 leg day trip are definitely hoes.
Plane Coffee |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2714859)
Out of base is the key there. With a bunch of small bases you lose all flexibility in base. ACY is small and there is very little to swap with usually. Every time we open a new base we dilute the existing bases and lower flexibility as well as slow seniority movement in base. A handful of big bases throughout the country is best. A bunch of mini bases is terrible.
|
Originally Posted by galleycafe
(Post 2714961)
Where's my corner and how far back do you like my legs?
Plane Coffee filler….. |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2714718)
Oh I see, so they decided to open an entire base because another base would be slightly inconvenienced for less than 12 months.............
Okie dokie bud, I guess nothing to do with the 30+ departures out of MCO and the 60+ rooms we pay for there every night. Yeah.... Thought so. |
Originally Posted by Acehole
(Post 2715097)
Oh fill me full of your great wisdom from Skywest. You’ve been here how long??
Yeah.... Thought so. Google Ad hominem. |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2715099)
Can't attack the argument so you attack the person?
Google Ad hominem. Point is... Some of us have seen this game played out before.. Some “phuckry” is afoot. Trust me. |
Originally Posted by Acehole
(Post 2715103)
WTF is google?
Point is... Some of us have seen this game played out before.. Some “phuckry” is afoot. Trust me. Just because I haven't been here until recently doesn't mean I'm new to this whole charade we call the industry |
Originally Posted by ecam
(Post 2714977)
No, actually we post swap and trade trips constantly here. Even in the tiny bases. It's actually pretty easy to swap day trips and get a day off or am/pm if something comes up.
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 2714881)
I'm curious as to how its going to lower my flexibility when I don't have any right now anyway?
|
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2715151)
You want people leaving that are ahead of you (retirements, carrier changes, fleet, or base) and people being added below you. It doesn't matter if we hire another 10,000 pilots junior to you unless they're in the same fleet, seat, and base. Your relative position will stagnate, and your flexibility, if all the new hires were to go BWI in an A220.
At NK and WN upgrade is at 55%, except for a few holdouts. At all the legacy carriers there is 20 long haul FOs, and now 2 year captains, as long as you don't mind sitting reserve in EWR+JFK+LGA. I think having more types and more bases gives people more options. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2715109)
Swapping day trip between each other is much different than “swapping” (flica speak for trading with open-time) a mixed line when there is little to no open time because all the flying is spread out to a bunch of mini bases.
|
I’m not bagging on Alligent man. I’m just saying a bunch of mini bases is bad for relative seniority and lowers flexibility because of availability of open time. This isn’t a Spirit vs Alligent dick measuring contest that you want to make it. If you want me to say that Alligent has the best schedules and the most flexibility and the best possible scenario for seniority movement with a bunch of small bases then fine, you win.
I’m for opening another base if it’s a desirable location that a large group of pilots want to live. It’s almost always at the detriment to the pilots staying in the current bases but if it improves qol for a bunch of guys by taking them off the commuter rolls then I’m willing to make that sacrifice. But having a few big bases is the best for the group as a collective. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2715247)
Or all people above you could bid BWI A220 and those 10K newhires would end up underneath you....
At NK and WN upgrade is at 55%, except for a few holdouts. At all the legacy carriers there is 20 long haul FOs, and now 2 year captains, as long as you don't mind sitting reserve in EWR+JFK+LGA. I think having more types and more bases gives people more options. |
We have very few retirements in the next 10 years. The majority of my seniority (Hey, that rhymes!) has, and will continue to come from people hired behind me. Especially in the more senior bases. More people behind me means more lines / PBS options in base. I may still need to bid the same amount, but I'll at least have more to choose from. MCO stagnates that.
That being said, I'm glad the company is expanding and continuing to grow. So... silver linings. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2715790)
We have very few retirements in the next 10 years. The majority of my seniority (Hey, that rhymes!) has, and will continue to come from people hired behind me. Especially in the more senior bases. More people behind me means more lines / PBS options in base. I may still need to bid the same amount, but I'll at least have more to choose from. MCO stagnates that.
That being said, I'm glad the company is expanding and continuing to grow. So... silver linings. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2715774)
But we're not that airline. There are 3 out there if that's what folks need.
|
Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
(Post 2714873)
You’d be singing a different tune if you happened to live in one of these “mini bases” and were stuck commuting. I can see both sides of the argument though. Also who says that any of the new bases are going to be small, MCO could very well be bigger than Vegas or DFW when it’s all said and done. Same for BWI if that ever happens.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Plan for MCO is at least the same size of DFW per crew plan |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2715247)
Or all people above you could bid BWI A220 and those 10K newhires would end up underneath you....
At NK and WN upgrade is at 55%, except for a few holdouts. At all the legacy carriers there is 20 long haul FOs, and now 2 year captains, as long as you don't mind sitting reserve in EWR+JFK+LGA. I think having more types and more bases gives people more options. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2715833)
Right now ACY is the junior base for FOs. Pretty much every month the whole FO list gets replaced. You want to be senior, bid ACY FO! The only way MCO would stagnate your seniority would be if more junior people than senior people bid MCO. If more senior people bid out of your base to MCO it is the same as retirements: your number goes up without the base growing. Without knowing if the new base will be senior, there is no way of telling how it will affect you seniority.
Absolutely not true. Out of the 60 FOs that we have in ACY, 51 want to be there. There is almost no movement for ACY FOs since the senior ones aren't upgrading because they can't sit reserve from home, or are enjoying being senior. ACY is junior for FO's (only 9 last bid), but the ones that don't want to be there will probably never have to fly a trip out of there. By the time they're done training, they are based in FLL or DTW. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2715565)
I’m not bagging on Alligent man. I’m just saying a bunch of mini bases is bad for relative seniority and lowers flexibility because of availability of open time. This isn’t a Spirit vs Alligent dick measuring contest that you want to make it. If you want me to say that Alligent has the best schedules and the most flexibility and the best possible scenario for seniority movement with a bunch of small bases then fine, you win.
I’m for opening another base if it’s a desirable location that a large group of pilots want to live. It’s almost always at the detriment to the pilots staying in the current bases but if it improves qol for a bunch of guys by taking them off the commuter rolls then I’m willing to make that sacrifice. But having a few big bases is the best for the group as a collective. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands