Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
Is Spirit properly staffed for this summer >

Is Spirit properly staffed for this summer

Search

Notices

Is Spirit properly staffed for this summer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2019 | 08:32 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 59
From: Office Chair
Default

Don't you think it's rather naive to believe the company never conducted a detailed cost/benefit analysis of the implementation of such a financially significant aspect of the contract? I'm not buying it. What I am buying is that the longer said implementation takes, the more the company benefits, with next to no risk or cost.
Reply
Old 03-19-2019 | 05:37 AM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Default

It was Yuri selling PBS to Bendo as the magic wand to fix all Spirit Crew Scheduling problems. Put that together with what's happed in the meeting for PBS and its clear cost analysis was never done by either side. As I've said before I asked our union guys if it was done and the answer was no. ALPA didn't see the need.
Reply
Old 03-21-2019 | 02:17 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Default

They're not receiving any benefits from a system that isn't in place. You don't get more efficient use of pilots by continuing to use the old system, you get it when you start using the new system. So the company is also losing every month this drags out without implementation.
Reply
Old 03-21-2019 | 05:13 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

They’re likely saving $3-5M a month in pilot pay by not using the new rigs.
Reply
Old 03-21-2019 | 07:21 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default

And saving tons of money from us losing the transition conflict without the new rigs in place. I'm not sure how or why the union agreed to this.
Reply
Old 03-22-2019 | 12:23 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
They’re likely saving $3-5M a month in pilot pay by not using the new rigs.
But not getting any increase in efficiency from PBS. So how does that all equal out? Are they losing more than $3-5M/month by not having PBS? I don't know the answer.

Originally Posted by beech_nut
And saving tons of money from us losing the transition conflict without the new rigs in place. I'm not sure how or why the union agreed to this.
Fair point.
Reply
Old 03-22-2019 | 06:36 AM
  #57  
skytrekker's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by beech_nut
And saving tons of money from us losing the transition conflict without the new rigs in place. I'm not sure how or why the union agreed to this.
There were 3 negotiators and 9 MEC votes. 70% of @1500 eligible voters "agreed" to it.

What did the company hammer on the most? Transition conflict. They got that day one of this contract.

Perhaps the new credits and rigs will cost more than conflict did over time as we move towards 3000 + pilots. Oh well.
Reply
Old 03-25-2019 | 04:54 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skytrekker
There were 3 negotiators and 9 MEC votes. 70% of @1500 eligible voters "agreed" to it.

What did the company hammer on the most? Transition conflict. They got that day one of this contract.

Perhaps the new credits and rigs will cost more than conflict did over time as we move towards 3000 + pilots. Oh well.
I was not here pre-contract. So inform me. My impression is that PBS and transition conflict changes were almost if not completely separate points of negotiation. One could happen without the other. So is the point on transition conflict savings really relevant when it comes to PBS?
Reply
Old 03-26-2019 | 05:54 AM
  #59  
TrojanCMH's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flightcap
I was not here pre-contract. So inform me. My impression is that PBS and transition conflict changes were almost if not completely separate points of negotiation. One could happen without the other. So is the point on transition conflict savings really relevant when it comes to PBS?


PBS by default solves the transition conflict issue the company was having. Where we got bent over / out negotiated is when we agreed to give them the current transition conflict bandaid we have right now before getting our new rigs and duty day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 03-26-2019 | 07:36 AM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
PBS by default solves the transition conflict issue the company was having. Where we got bent over / out negotiated is when we agreed to give them the current transition conflict bandaid we have right now before getting our new rigs and duty day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This. Well said.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
bubi352
Major
74
07-06-2008 05:58 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
taylorjets
Major
5
01-29-2008 09:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices