![]() |
Originally Posted by HulkaBurger
(Post 3105266)
Yep. The omnipresent moderator here basically admitted just that.
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...amp/3302324001
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile..../idUSKCN2512QE It looks like everyone in Washington is getting onboard with the idea, Trump, Democrats, and a good number of Republicans. Experts are being optimistic...if the language is the same as the last one, we will have our jobs for another 6 months-ish... cue Bon Jovi... https://youtu.be/lDK9QqIzhwk |
Not necessarily, they said even with CAREs 2, furloughs will happpen. Whether or not it will mitigate the number of furloughs depends on the stipulations attached to the bill.
|
Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
(Post 3105893)
Not necessarily, they said even with CAREs 2, furloughs will happpen. Whether or not it will mitigate the number of furloughs depends on the stipulations attached to the bill.
Maybe the language will change, but for now that is where we stand. |
Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
(Post 3105893)
Not necessarily, they said even with CAREs 2, furloughs will happpen. Whether or not it will mitigate the number of furloughs depends on the stipulations attached to the bill.
|
Well, if I understood what they were saying yesterday, the won’t take the CARES money if it stipulates no layoffs or furloughs. Spirit is in survival mode at the moment and they said it’s cheaper to furlough. So unless I misunderstood or something miraculous happens, furloughs are coming
|
Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
(Post 3105906)
Well, if I understood what they were saying yesterday, the won’t take the CARES money if it stipulates no layoffs or furloughs. Spirit is in survival mode at the moment and they said it’s cheaper to furlough. So unless I misunderstood or something miraculous happens, furloughs are coming
=12pt“=12ptBendo: Jeff answered correctly, we are in support of CAREs 2.0 with PSP, would be a taker of that money, and if it got here before we furlough, presuming contains same language, we wouldn’t be doing furloughs. If it happens afterwards, we have to look at rules and see how it would would work. The PSP program is to protect jobs, that’s why we’re for it, why Ted has spoken directly to some “very senior” folks in Washington, other airline CEOs have done so as well.” |
Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
(Post 3105906)
Well, if I understood what they were saying yesterday, the won’t take the CARES money if it stipulates no layoffs or furloughs. Spirit is in survival mode at the moment and they said it’s cheaper to furlough. So unless I misunderstood or something miraculous happens, furloughs are coming
|
Originally Posted by cairbear
(Post 3105913)
this is bendos quote -
=12pt“=12ptbendo: Jeff answered correctly, we are in support of cares 2.0 with psp, would be a taker of that money, and if it got here before we furlough, presuming contains same language, we wouldn’t be doing furloughs. If it happens afterwards, we have to look at rules and see how it would would work. The psp program is to protect jobs, that’s why we’re for it, why ted has spoken directly to some “very senior” folks in washington, other airline ceos have done so as well.” |
Originally Posted by Meep
(Post 3105916)
I think they were saying they would take the money and go with whatever strings were attached to it. They just didn’t want to say they wouldn’t furlough if they got more $$$ as it all depends on the language. What if it says “you can furlough up to 10] well, they’re going to furlough 10% and take the money.
If you thought it were going to extend past next summer, maybe then? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands