October 1
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
So basically you want to continue to have the entire economy shut down for people being at risk in nursing homes because the management of those facilities failed their clients? I’m sure outside of the managed care facilities, there are many with pre-existing conditions included in the deaths of Covid 19, but the vast majority of the working people of this economy will be ok. But if you want to stay in your safe space, I’m ok with that.
#72
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,143
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
The annual flu toll is approximately equal to the vietnam toll.
The annual highway carnage toll is approximately equal to the vietnam toll.
#73
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323855
https://www.myocarditisfoundation.or...f-myocarditis/
https://www.thelancet.com/article/S1...168-2/fulltext
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 12
Why isn’t it? If you are in a category of being at risk for Covid 19, you have the choice of isolating yourself until a vaccine is available just like you have a choice of supersizing at Micky D’s. It’s a choice. I should be able to decide if I want to go to work. If you don’t like it, that’s your choice.
So basically you want to continue to have the entire economy shut down for people being at risk in nursing homes because the management of those facilities failed their clients? I’m sure outside of the managed care facilities, there are many with pre-existing conditions included in the deaths of Covid 19, but the vast majority of the working people of this economy will be ok. But if you want to stay in your safe space, I’m ok with that.
So basically you want to continue to have the entire economy shut down for people being at risk in nursing homes because the management of those facilities failed their clients? I’m sure outside of the managed care facilities, there are many with pre-existing conditions included in the deaths of Covid 19, but the vast majority of the working people of this economy will be ok. But if you want to stay in your safe space, I’m ok with that.
Now if you’ll excuse me, my cheeseburger from Uber Eats has arrived, since I’m too scared to leave my house and burn calories to go get it myself.
#75
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
The number that Covid-19 deaths are not being weighed against, and is harder to immediately quantify, is the number of lives being lost to suicide, opioid addiction, domestic violence and so on and so forth as people are financially ruined from the shutdown. There are a lot of us cruising along semi normally through this, but many, many people are being devastated.
If that hat number is even a tenth of a percent of the population then it dwarfs the Covid deaths by about a factor of 5. Opening things up will increase the former and decrease the latter. The idea is to have them meet at the L/Dmax point for minimum death moving forward. And that point isn’t to continue to shelter in place.
The coming freak outs of Covid cases and deaths on the rise as people start mixing again is to be expected. But only because a baseline cost benefit analysis with which to measure those deaths against isn’t being presented to the populace for consideration. One, because it’s not easy to quantify, and two, because sensationalism sells.
Yes, Covid deaths have exceeded Vietnam war deaths. If the death rate caused by the financial stresses of the shutdown is even one tenth of one percent of the population then we are rapidly approaching WW2 death tolls, and if it’s five hundredths of one percent then it’s still nearly three times the Corona virus lives lost.
Hence, it’s time to opens things up in a reasonable phased approach with the goal of having everything running full tilt again by perhaps late summer or early fall while the most at risk shelter as best they can until we have more tools available to help those suffering the worst effects of the infection.
If that hat number is even a tenth of a percent of the population then it dwarfs the Covid deaths by about a factor of 5. Opening things up will increase the former and decrease the latter. The idea is to have them meet at the L/Dmax point for minimum death moving forward. And that point isn’t to continue to shelter in place.
The coming freak outs of Covid cases and deaths on the rise as people start mixing again is to be expected. But only because a baseline cost benefit analysis with which to measure those deaths against isn’t being presented to the populace for consideration. One, because it’s not easy to quantify, and two, because sensationalism sells.
Yes, Covid deaths have exceeded Vietnam war deaths. If the death rate caused by the financial stresses of the shutdown is even one tenth of one percent of the population then we are rapidly approaching WW2 death tolls, and if it’s five hundredths of one percent then it’s still nearly three times the Corona virus lives lost.
Hence, it’s time to opens things up in a reasonable phased approach with the goal of having everything running full tilt again by perhaps late summer or early fall while the most at risk shelter as best they can until we have more tools available to help those suffering the worst effects of the infection.
#76
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Maybe you should research what happens when an economy crashes?
Wear a mask, try not to touch your face and wash your hands... Dip*hit.
#77
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 383
Likes: 30
Yes, and meanwhile over 33,000,000 are unemployed and still rapidly climbing, with no end in sight. All for a fraction of 1% of the population.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
separately, we aren’t doing this for the <1% of the population (the percent that has been infected thus far), we’re doing it to protect our entire population. I mean it’s not rocket science to see that without the measures taken, hospitals would be drowning right now.
I want people to start flying and shopping again, too, I’m just not going to let a Republican or Democrat backed news outlet tell me what to think and who to hate over all this lol
#80
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Let the record show I’m not here to support either specific side of this argument (amazing how FOX and CNN can divide us over anything), but one could reasonably say that without all these measures (and unemployment), we wouldn’t be talking about “a fraction of 1%” of the population.
separately, we aren’t doing this for the <1% of the population (the percent that has been infected thus far), we’re doing it to protect our entire population. I mean it’s not rocket science to see that without the measures taken, hospitals would be drowning right now
separately, we aren’t doing this for the <1% of the population (the percent that has been infected thus far), we’re doing it to protect our entire population. I mean it’s not rocket science to see that without the measures taken, hospitals would be drowning right now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



