![]() |
Originally Posted by turbojet28
(Post 3589070)
Probably the institutional investors getting tired of the obvious baloney and constant downplaying of existential threats by management during the earnings calls. I think they are starting to call the bluff.
Listening to UALs earnings call for 4Q, maybe Kirby will not be 100% correct about all of his predictions, but he sure sounded night-and-day different than Biffle about acknowledging all the challenges ahead for the industry. |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3521752)
Bc it’s at $22ish and when this closes next year they’ll pay you $33.50
|
How many people are buying this stock down here for if the merger goes through?
|
Why would if/not/does go through mater?
|
Originally Posted by 93Sierra
(Post 3599582)
Why would if/not/does go through mater?
|
Originally Posted by Round Luggage
(Post 3599531)
How many people are buying this stock down here for if the merger goes through?
maybe Spirit and JetBlue could do this to score some points with the Biden Admin. https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-urg...004818415.html |
I bet the DOJ files a lawsuit in the next week or two and SAVE will dump. That’s when I’d consider buying.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3599735)
I bet the DOJ files a lawsuit in the next week or two and SAVE will dump. That’s when I’d consider buying.
that’s what I’m waiting for. Betting on the lawsuit and eventual settlement. |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3599735)
I bet the DOJ files a lawsuit in the next week or two and SAVE will dump. That’s when I’d consider buying.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3599735)
I bet the DOJ files a lawsuit in the next week or two and SAVE will dump. That’s when I’d consider buying.
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3599827)
that’s what I’m waiting for. Betting on the lawsuit and eventual settlement.
Originally Posted by Round Luggage
(Post 3600117)
I’m literally betting that’s mostly baked in.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3600252)
IKR, because a line pilot knows better than all those chumps that do that for a living. Not saying you can't get lucky, but it would be just that.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3600252)
IKR, because a line pilot knows better than all those chumps that do that for a living. Not saying you can't get lucky, but it would be just that. And it’s just that. Play money. Gambling. Not investing for retirement here. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3600252)
IKR, because a line pilot knows better than all those chumps that do that for a living. Not saying you can't get lucky, but it would be just that. |
Hmmm seems it wasn’t already “baked in”. Maybe I’m not an idiot after all. Down 5% in the last 20 mins.
|
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3602853)
Hmmm seems it wasn’t already “baked in”. Maybe I’m not an idiot after all. Down 5% in the last 20 mins.
|
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3602853)
Hmmm seems it wasn’t already “baked in”. Maybe I’m not an idiot after all. Down 5% in the last 20 mins.
Stock is down because of our clown administration’s fruitless endeavor just for a political show. |
Originally Posted by Round Luggage
(Post 3602856)
I’d consider 5% baked for this kind of headline. Maybe we both are not idiots.
getting ugly today |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3602928)
10% now.
getting ugly today |
5 years ago it was all like:
"That little amount of legroom should be illegal!" "Charging for everything should be illegal" "Paying for a paper ticket should be illegal!" Now that someone is actually willing to make the most hated airline (which has doubled in size since then) part of a respectable operation, *that* should be illegal? |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3603258)
5 years ago it was all like:
"That little amount of legroom should be illegal!" "Charging for everything should be illegal" "Paying for a paper ticket should be illegal!" Now that someone is actually willing to make the most hated airline (which has doubled in size since then) part of a respectable operation, *that* should be illegal? |
Originally Posted by BernieM86
(Post 3603238)
There’s a specific date you had to have already owned SAVE to get the agreed price from B6. You can’t just buy it now and get that price later, that was part of the deal they made. Not sure about the other particulars though.
There was a specific date you had to own by to get the prepayment ticking fee. Once the merger closes if you own stock you get the $31. |
Up on the baked in news.
|
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3603258)
5 years ago it was all like:
"That little amount of legroom should be illegal!" "Charging for everything should be illegal" "Paying for a paper ticket should be illegal!" Now that someone is actually willing to make the most hated airline (which has doubled in size since then) part of a respectable operation, *that* should be illegal? |
Originally Posted by BernieM86
(Post 3603238)
There’s a specific date you had to have already owned SAVE to get the agreed price from B6. You can’t just buy it now and get that price later, that was part of the deal they made. Not sure about the other particulars though.
|
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3603851)
So if I buy 1,000 shares of SAVE right now at $17, what will it be worth if/when the merger closes?
filler depends on close date though I believe. |
With a favorable merger ruling imminent, what is everybody’s strategy with their SAVE stock and why?
Are you just going to let Jetblue just buy it out at the agreed price or do you think there’s going to be an overreaction in the market and set a sell limit or stop sell incase it goes over ≈$28share before correcting? |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3730476)
With a favorable merger ruling imminent, what is everybody’s strategy with their SAVE stock and why?
Are you just going to let Jetblue just buy it out at the agreed price or do you think there’s going to be an overreaction in the market and set a sell limit or stop sell incase it goes over ≈$28share before correcting? |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3730499)
Im going to take Mrs Halon out for a nice seafood dinner, and never call her again
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3730499)
Im going to take Mrs Halon out for a nice seafood dinner, and never call her again
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3730543)
well considering my “Mrs. Halon” is a dude. He is going to put a nice fat one in your rear after yalls dinner date! HAHAHA.
|
Okay, who had a discussion about Spirit stock devolving into a discussion about butt sex on their bingo card??? I sure as Hell didn't.... 🤣
|
Originally Posted by CatPilot1
(Post 3730595)
so your husband is a rapist?
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3730543)
well considering my “Mrs. Halon” is a dude. He is going to put a nice fat one in your rear after yalls dinner date! HAHAHA.
|
Originally Posted by Tornado875
(Post 3730622)
Halon is a bottom confirmed.
|
Originally Posted by Tornado875
(Post 3730622)
Halon is a bottom confirmed.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3730935)
As a Spirit stock holder, I feel great confidence in my investment decisions.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3730935)
As a Spirit stock holder, I feel great confidence in my investment decisions.
Ready for the 2x on SAVE. Mahalos |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands