![]() |
Commuting at Spirit
Does Spirit have a commuter policy to get you to your base if flights are getting full?
|
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3290964)
Does Spirit have a commuter policy to get you to your base if flights are getting full?
|
I’m assuming the two flight rule is for line holders only? Or does it extend to reserves who commute in?
|
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3391703)
I’m assuming the two flight rule is for line holders only? Or does it extend to reserves who commute in?
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3391731)
It covers any assignment, but only to your domicile. Another shortfall in our contract. If you’re commuting to reserve in your assigned base, you’re covered. Keep in mind that you aren’t pay protected.
Commuting policies will be new for me. |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3391763)
Thanks, Jules. They'll purchase a ticket on any airline for you or just a Spirit flight?
Commuting policies will be new for me. |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3391763)
Thanks, Jules. They'll purchase a ticket on any airline for you or just a Spirit flight?
Commuting policies will be new for me. |
Last time I used the commuter clause, they assigned me to reserve days on days off equivalent to the amount of days I missed the following week. I fought it and lost, the contract allows it and “it’s a new way the company is interpreting the contract.”
|
Originally Posted by mavsfflife
(Post 3391885)
Last time I used the commuter clause, they assigned me to reserve days on days off equivalent to the amount of days I missed the following week. I fought it and lost, the contract allows it and “it’s a new way the company is interpreting the contract.”
|
Originally Posted by mavsfflife
(Post 3391885)
Last time I used the commuter clause, they assigned me to reserve days on days off equivalent to the amount of days I missed the following week. I fought it and lost, the contract allows it and “it’s a new way the company is interpreting the contract.”
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3391890)
You fought it through the NCC process? Did they file a formal grievance or that was their “answer” after meeting with the company for your NCC?
I’ll let y’all come to your own conclusions on what may be a better option than using the commuter clause if you can’t make it in. |
Originally Posted by mavsfflife
(Post 3391906)
Fought it initially with the CP and union, then through the NCC process. Received a call from the grievance chair that it was unfortunately how they have been interpreting the contract now. If you look in the commuter policy section now, it’s buried in there. I’d never had it used on me though.
I’ll let y’all come to your own conclusions on what may be a better option than using the commuter clause if you can’t make it in. |
Originally Posted by mavsfflife
(Post 3391906)
Fought it initially with the CP and union, then through the NCC process. Received a call from the grievance chair that it was unfortunately how they have been interpreting the contract now. If you look in the commuter policy section now, it’s buried in there. I’d never had it used on me though.
I’ll let y’all come to your own conclusions on what may be a better option than using the commuter clause if you can’t make it in. |
What does this buried language say? Quoted would be good. We had a similar issue at f9 but it’s to long of a discussion to get into and there’s now an loa. They can’t add flying and I’m fairly sure rdp but you have to finish above 60/70 if you forgo the pay. There’s no contractual mechanism to add flying outside reassignment. Reassignment is separated out language for a reason but I don’t know what this buried language in your contract says?
|
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3392023)
What does this buried language say? Quoted would be good. We had a similar issue at f9 but it’s to long of a discussion to get into and there’s now an loa. They can’t add flying and I’m fairly sure rdp but you have to finish above 60/70 if you forgo the pay. There’s no contractual mechanism to add flying outside reassignment.
same number of calendar days of his original missed trip pairing (e.g., a pilot who misses a scheduled trip pairing of three calendar days may be assigned to no more than three calendar reserve duty days)." Nothing hidden, but does not specifically forbid the adding of days outside the original trip foot print. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3392030)
"b. Assign the pilot to reserve duty for no more than the
same number of calendar days of his original missed trip pairing (e.g., a pilot who misses a scheduled trip pairing of three calendar days may be assigned to no more than three calendar reserve duty days)." Nothing hidden, but does not specifically forbid the adding of days outside the original trip foot print. That sounds like intent is a lineholder can be assigned res. How do you miss a scheduled trip as a res? An argument could be made it doesn’t apply to res. Past practice/disputes would help with that argument but it might not be winnable in arbitration. Hard to say. |
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3392033)
That sounds like intent is a lineholder can be assigned res. How do you miss a scheduled trip as a res? An argument could be made it doesn’t apply to res. Past practice would help with that argument but it might not be winnable in arbitration. Hard to say.
|
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3392033)
That sounds like intent is a lineholder can be assigned res. How do you miss a scheduled trip as a res? An argument could be made it doesn’t apply to res. Past practice would help with that argument but it might not be winnable in arbitration. Hard to say.
However, the point we were talking about was if the reserve days had to be within the original trip foot print, and apparently they don't. I do not like that at all. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3392044)
Yes, a line holder can be placed on reserve due to missing a trip commuting (don't necessarily have an issue with that, because at least you get pay). A long call reserve assigned a trip could use the same clause, and get reassigned to short call too (probably). As a short call you really can't use the commute policy.
However, the point we were talking about was if the reserve days had to be within the original trip foot print, and apparently they don't. I do not like that at all. |
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3392050)
right which is why it’s probably worth making the argument. Worst case get an loa. I’m sure allowing a res to be stuck anywhere in a bid period was not discussed in negotiations. Nobody would agree to that scenario.
|
Our contract is worse than my old regional in a number of spots, this is one.
|
Originally Posted by mavsfflife
(Post 3392043)
I was on reserve when it happened to me. Self notify for the trip the night before and youre not on reserve anymore. Tried to commute out the next day and no luck.
makes a little more sense how that happened but again I’m fairly certain the ability to place res assignments anywhere in a bid period was not discussed in negotiations. It seems intent of that language was placing the res in the original footprint and/or res windows. It doesn’t look like res to res was even contemplated. I imagine the though was you would just lose credit and continue with the next res assignment following day. |
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3392059)
makes a little more sense how that happened but again I’m fairly certain the ability to place res assignments anywhere in a bid period was not discussed in negotiations. It seems intent of that language was placing the res in the original footprint and/or res windows.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3392060)
CS have been reinterpreting things lately. I agree with you.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3392060)
CS have been reinterpreting things lately. I agree with you.
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3392061)
CS Management. The individual schedulers are still very personable albeit not trained well on our contract. The new interpretations are coming straight from the top.
|
The union filed a grievance, went to arbitration, won, couldn’t come to a remedy resolution with the company, went back to the arbitrator for remedy, he ruled again, gave the company 6 more months to violate the commuter clause, gave zero award to the harmed pilots, and the union communicated that at several points along the way and just now you guys are getting out your pitch forks?
If you are a commuter and weren’t paying attention than shame on you. Despite the fact the union spun it as a win, it wasn’t. It was bad before when they basically suspended you for the original foot print of the dropped trip, and it’s possibly even worse now, where they force you to reserve without the choice of trying to find a trip to pick up in its place. But that’s not the fault of the union, as they say in sports, never leave it up to the ref. In this case the arbitrator screwed us, all the while awarding in favor of the association. |
If a screw scheduler is clearly violating the agreement ask to discuss with a supervisor. Arbitrators have ruled in the past a crew scheduler can’t be expected to know an entire pilot contract.
|
Originally Posted by PrattFan
(Post 3392069)
The union filed a grievance, went to arbitration, won, couldn’t come to a remedy resolution with the company, went back to the arbitrator for remedy, he ruled again, gave the company 6 more months to violate the commuter clause, gave zero award to the harmed pilots, and the union communicated that at several points along the way and just now you guys are getting out your pitch forks?
If you are a commuter and weren’t paying attention than shame on you. Despite the fact the union spun it as a win, it wasn’t. It was bad before when they basically suspended you for the original foot print of the dropped trip, and it’s possibly even worse now, where they force you to reserve without the choice of trying to find a trip to pick up in its place. But that’s not the fault of the union, as they say in sports, never leave it up to the ref. In this case the arbitrator screwed us, all the while awarding in favor of the association. |
Originally Posted by PrattFan
(Post 3392069)
The union filed a grievance, went to arbitration, won, couldn’t come to a remedy resolution with the company, went back to the arbitrator for remedy, he ruled again, gave the company 6 more months to violate the commuter clause, gave zero award to the harmed pilots, and the union communicated that at several points along the way and just now you guys are getting out your pitch forks?
If you are a commuter and weren’t paying attention than shame on you. Despite the fact the union spun it as a win, it wasn’t. It was bad before when they basically suspended you for the original foot print of the dropped trip, and it’s possibly even worse now, where they force you to reserve without the choice of trying to find a trip to pick up in its place. But that’s not the fault of the union, as they say in sports, never leave it up to the ref. In this case the arbitrator screwed us, all the while awarding in favor of the association. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3392044)
. As a short call you really can't use the commute policy.
However, the point we were talking about was if the reserve days had to be within the original trip foot print, and apparently they don't. I do not like that at all. |
Originally Posted by seadogrun
(Post 3392543)
It has been years since I commuted on reserve, but I remember using the commute clause to get in position for short call reserve. Is that not the case anymore?
|
Originally Posted by seadogrun
(Post 3392543)
It has been years since I commuted on reserve, but I remember using the commute clause to get in position for short call reserve. Is that not the case anymore?
|
Commuting in AFTER getting a call for SCR seems odd, where on earth are you commuting in by air to arrive at the plane within the SCR time? CBA doesn’t really specify the difference between commuting before or after an assignment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
No parking pass for commuters?
So if I understand it right Spirit has said F U to its commuters and they’re not given a parking pass for their home airport?
Looked elsewhere for this but figured a commuting thread was decent place for this question. |
Originally Posted by Beachbum808
(Post 3510801)
So if I understand it right Spirit has said F U to its commuters and they’re not given a parking pass for their home airport?
Looked elsewhere for this but figured a commuting thread was decent place for this question. |
Originally Posted by Beachbum808
(Post 3510801)
So if I understand it right Spirit has said F U to its commuters and they’re not given a parking pass for their home airport?
Looked elsewhere for this but figured a commuting thread was decent place for this question. |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3510863)
You're able to get parking at any Spirit base. If you commute from elsewhere you're screwed.
It's a losing proposition on all sides. |
If it makes you feel any better, WN doesn't offer paid parking to anyone, in domiciles or not.
|
Another fun fact about commuting at Spirit is that if you don’t make your commute they will now assign you reserve for the days that the trip covered. They used to give us the option to drop, add a different trip or reserve but supposedly people found a way to abuse that so now scheduling was instructed to assign reserve 100% of the time.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands