Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Best option for NK pilot group? >

Best option for NK pilot group?

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Which option is best for Spirit Pilots?
Frontier Merger
33
19.30%
JetBlue Takeover
116
67.84%
Staying Independent
22
12.87%
Voters: 171. You may not vote on this poll

Best option for NK pilot group?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2022 | 06:05 PM
  #31  
Mainline Mulier's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Boeing 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by buttonpusher68
I'm surprised that no one is talking about the likelihood of a major slow down in progression if the B6 deal happens. I get we don't like the haunting experience of F9's management when they were here, or Barry's stupid comment about a pilot surplus (posturing), but an F9 merger has significantly more airplanes and growth ahead than does a B6 merger. Obviously we need to fix the attrition problem (which any idiot understands cannot continue if we are to meet our growth plans..or any growth) but aside from that anyone with 10 or more years left will likely see much better options and a better overall business model with the F9 merger.

MTC,
BP
Better options and a better business model? To who?

B6 has multiple fleet types and bid categories, that creates fleet stratification and faster upgrades.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 06:26 PM
  #32  
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Default

I for one can’t wait to work for a CEO who thinks he has a “surplus” of pilots.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 06:27 PM
  #33  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Indigo would never pull orders from Frontier and give them to another portfolio airline they control.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 06:30 PM
  #34  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mainline Mulier
Better options and a better business model? To who?

B6 has multiple fleet types and bid categories, that creates fleet stratification and faster upgrades.
Go look at the B6 discussion about upgrade times. I think you'll find the reality quite different that what you state. If you think stagnation is bad now, a B6 merger will make it look like child's play.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 07:10 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by buttonpusher68
I'm surprised that no one is talking about the likelihood of a major slow down in progression if the B6 deal happens. I get we don't like the haunting experience of F9's management when they were here, or Barry's stupid comment about a pilot surplus (posturing), but an F9 merger has significantly more airplanes and growth ahead than does a B6 merger. Obviously we need to fix the attrition problem (which any idiot understands cannot continue if we are to meet our growth plans..or any growth) but aside from that anyone with 10 or more years left will likely see much better options and a better overall business model with the F9 merger.

MTC,
BP
does F9 have that much more growth? All those orders are indigos not frontiers. Jet blue has plenty of orders and so do we.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 07:43 PM
  #36  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 139
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
does F9 have that much more growth? All those orders are indigos not frontiers. Jet blue has plenty of orders and so do we.
The current plan. This doesn’t include the orders for the other airlines.

Edit to add….We currently have 1750ish pilots. We need 1860ish to remain fully staffed by year end. Classes are around 50+ a month with a loss of 30ish a month due to attrition. So when BB said we are fully staffed he wasn’t lying…for now.

Last edited by Stayontarget; 08-11-2022 at 10:14 AM.
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 08:53 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mainline Mulier
B6 has multiple fleet types and bid categories, that creates fleet stratification and faster upgrades.
B6 is getting rid of the 190s. Those pilots will have to go somewhere. What do you think will happen to upgrade times once the 190s are phased out? 😬😬
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 08:54 PM
  #38  
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Default

Originally Posted by BufordT Justice
B6 is getting rid of the 190s. Those pilots will have to go somewhere. What do you think will happen to upgrade times once the 190s are phased out? 😬😬
I heard a wild rumor they already have A220's to replace them and even ordered a bunch more to replace the rest of the 190's...
Reply
Old 06-28-2022 | 09:26 PM
  #39  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 278
Default

Originally Posted by buttonpusher68
I'm surprised that no one is talking about the likelihood of a major slow down in progression if the B6 deal happens. I get we don't like the haunting experience of F9's management when they were here, or Barry's stupid comment about a pilot surplus (posturing), but an F9 merger has significantly more airplanes and growth ahead than does a B6 merger. Obviously we need to fix the attrition problem (which any idiot understands cannot continue if we are to meet our growth plans..or any growth) but aside from that anyone with 10 or more years left will likely see much better options and a better overall business model with the F9 merger.

MTC,
BP
Not sure how you came to this conclusion. JetBlue has aircraft on order, and I see no reason why they wouldn't take our current orders and add to the stack. They won't be buying us to stay locked in the north east. They are buying us to become a better version of Southwest.
Reply
Old 06-29-2022 | 05:04 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 36
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
Not sure how you came to this conclusion. JetBlue has aircraft on order, and I see no reason why they wouldn't take our current orders and add to the stack. They won't be buying us to stay locked in the north east. They are buying us to become a better version of Southwest.
The theme from some F9 fellows and a few NK, since this all started, has always been "have fun commuting to the NE" and "B6 will be stagnated, no progression if there should be a B6NK, go look at their thread" and other BS, as if they are convincing TIG and Vanguard lol

But to address those 2 quotes above.

1. B6 will not buy NK just to suck everything in the NE lol lol as much as they (F9) want y'all to believe that. In a pocket session, while covid was sucking everyones life out, it was evident mgmt realized being big in just the N.E really messed us up more than others. They want to have those bases where NK is right now. To think that B6 would get NK then force everyone to NY/BOS/EWR and close majority (if not all) bases is a very stupid idea. This is just an idea some of those on here cook up to make y'all feel like F9 deal is better for the pilots. It's an unrealistic idea, especially when its already so congested in the NE already plus the slot constraints in NY. Can't add more flights to JFK if ya don't have the slots (even with the NEA).

2. Ok the "no progression"
So they are judging today's B6 standalone (we do have progression) and assuming it will be the same when B6 gets NK. What?
The combined company will have more bases (see point 1 above) and a lot more aircrafts on order and there will be no progression? I can see that bullsheit argument from 35000ft.

More bases and more aircraft orders increases progression, not stop it. Folks can spread out easier in different bases and different status in those bases.

Look, I get it. Everyone has their own personal reason why they want it to go one way or the other. That's ok. But stop creating these crazy far fetch scenarios to justify your stance. All of a sudden, we care what's good for the people and we love Synergies and better business model lol stop all that nonsense. We wanna get paid, we control nothing else.

Nothing but the best for all of us, whichever way it goes. I'm B6 so I am biased but I'm not gonna make up some wild ass far fetched reason for liking the idea of the combination. For me, bigger company with more bases help with seniority in each base, which is good for pilots. And that's what I care about, my fellow pilots and QOL. The company can worry about running the business.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fightandflight
UPS
4
07-29-2017 05:49 AM
prior121
Mesa Airlines
53
02-26-2014 06:15 PM
strikeagledrivr
Major
198
12-05-2013 10:12 AM
APM145
Union Talk
0
02-15-2009 04:23 PM
Woofer
Career Questions
1
06-08-2008 06:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices