Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
ULCC model in the USA weakening >

ULCC model in the USA weakening

Search

Notices

ULCC model in the USA weakening

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2023 | 09:04 AM
  #111  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,247
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
There are a lot of different aspects to the problem.
One is that the pay difference between WBFO and NBCA is not that large and WBFO is a great life.
You guys also missed one important aspect of why there are unfilled CA vacancies at United. Things are moving very quickly there. Monthly vacancies. The current open vacancy bid has 200 CA vacancies. 119 CA vacancies on the current snapshot are unfilled ... there are more than a few last minute bids which will fill most of those unfilled vacancies. Many will hold off on bidding up when they can do it next month or a few months later and time their training dates to something that works for them.

But the two biggest reasons why United, Delta, and American have so many upgrades available are due to 1) retirements and 2) rapid growth. Neither of which are present a Spirit and Frontier.
In fact, I have posted in the past that once the majors are done picking regionals clean, they'll be hiring as many pilots as possible from the ULCCs. And for the ULCCs, that means they will have similar problems as regionals for lifers - the seniority list doesn't grow, very few retirements, and lifers stay stagnant or even lose relative seniority at their airline because all of the FOs are leaving for legacies.
Maybe B6 will solve this problem for NK pilots, but B6 is also losing pilots to the legacies.
This is the reverse of the 15 or so years after 9/11.
Not saying there aren’t reasons to go to the legacies but whatI AM saying is that being a DEC anywhere, be it regional or even a legacy, means you are going to be getting the $hitty end of the stick for a long time, because that’s simply the way the seniority system works. Which is why although the “second tier”, which today I would say includes NK, F9, WN, and AS, may be bleeding FOs to the legacies, is tempting for mostly only the very junior (and or younger) CAs to change carriers. Even with prompt upgrades.

Money is a lot, but it isn’t everything.

I can’t help but wonder what a year of seniority would go for if I could be auction d off in an open market.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 09:51 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Not saying there aren’t reasons to go to the legacies but whatI AM saying is that being a DEC anywhere, be it regional or even a legacy, means you are going to be getting the $hitty end of the stick for a long time, because that’s simply the way the seniority system works. Which is why although the “second tier”, which today I would say includes NK, F9, WN, and AS, may be bleeding FOs to the legacies, is tempting for mostly only the very junior (and or younger) CAs to change carriers. Even with prompt upgrades.

Money is a lot, but it isn’t everything.

I can’t help but wonder what a year of seniority would go for if I could be auction d off in an open market.
You're cherry picking an extreme possibility that hasn't happened. Good job?
UAL won't be doing traditional DEC.
And unless they start awarding CA at indoc (possible with the new contract, but I don't consider it probable), no one is being forced into NBCA. One can stay NB or WB FO for their entire career at UAL.

As far as junior CAs, I know UAL's starting to get not-so junior CAs from F9 and LUV. I'm sure there are even a few not-so-junior NK and B6 CAs going to legacies.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 10:20 AM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 665
Likes: 48
Default

I'm not even sure what you guys are debating (Excargodog and Andy). Of course it makes sense for a lot of new FO's at ULCC's to leave for legacies. It may make sense for some captains in certain circumstances to leave as well. Will the majority leave? No. Will guys who stay be the equivalent of "regional lifers" and experience no seniority growth? No. To think that someone will be stagnant at Spirit because FO's will continue to get scooped up at this rate is not looking at the big picture. This current hiring environment is a blip on the radar of a 30-year career. If he/she is young enough, he/she can ride an incredible wave when the 40 something's start retiring down the road.

The upcoming contract seems to open the door for DEC's or de facto DEC's where someone gets 100 hours on the line and then is awarded an upgrade. The general consensus seems to be that this will attract captains from WN, NK, F9, etc. who want to go to UA but don't want to give up their CA money. What I think is more likely to happen is you have a 2000 hour F9 FO with 1000 hours right seat in an airbus bid captain, get their 350 hours in a 737, and then upgrade with less than 2500 total time, minimal time in Boeing aircraft and less than a year on property. Unless those vacancies get filled soon, it's likely to happen.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 10:51 AM
  #114  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
There are a lot of different aspects to the problem.
One is that the pay difference between WBFO and NBCA is not that large and WBFO is a great life.
You guys also missed one important aspect of why there are unfilled CA vacancies at United. Things are moving very quickly there. Monthly vacancies. The current open vacancy bid has 200 CA vacancies. 119 CA vacancies on the current snapshot are unfilled ... there are more than a few last minute bids which will fill most of those unfilled vacancies. Many will hold off on bidding up when they can do it next month or a few months later and time their training dates to something that works for them.

But the two biggest reasons why United, Delta, and American have so many upgrades available are due to 1) retirements and 2) rapid growth. Neither of which are present a Spirit and Frontier.
In fact, I have posted in the past that once the majors are done picking regionals clean, they'll be hiring as many pilots as possible from the ULCCs. And for the ULCCs, that means they will have similar problems as regionals for lifers - the seniority list doesn't grow, very few retirements, and lifers stay stagnant or even lose relative seniority at their airline because all of the FOs are leaving for legacies.
Maybe B6 will solve this problem for NK pilots, but B6 is also losing pilots to the legacies.
This is the reverse of the 15 or so years after 9/11.
Rapid growth is not happening at the LCC/ULCCs? That’s an interesting comment considering past precedence.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 10:58 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
Rapid growth is not happening at the LCC/ULCCs? That’s an interesting comment considering past precedence.
'
That's like talking about growth at regionals a couple of years ago.
Net pilot growth for '22 and thus far in '23 for the LCC/ULCCs?
Hiring is not covering much more than attrition.
Given the large number of retirements and legacy growth over the next decade, this trend is not going to reverse any time soon.


I must say that it's very ironic to read that rapid upgrades are bad on the NK forum where there used to be rapid upgrades. Now? Not so much.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 11:43 AM
  #116  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,247
Likes: 257
Default

Or, they economy and the industry could have one of its cyclical busts and the bottom 20% of all seniority lists could be looking hard for CFI jobs. Stranger things have happened.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 11:49 AM
  #117  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,247
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
'
That's like talking about growth at regionals a couple of years ago.
Net pilot growth for '22 and thus far in '23 for the LCC/ULCCs?
Hiring is not covering much more than attrition.
Given the large number of retirements and legacy growth over the next decade, this trend is not going to reverse any time soon.


I must say that it's very ironic to read that rapid upgrades are bad on the NK forum where there used to be rapid upgrades. Now? Not so much.
Not complaining about rapid upgrades. Just saying that upgrading to CA puts you at the bottom of the seat seniority list longer than being a newbie FO does, and that going to ANY new company as a CA is going to give you a DEC-like experience. Not saying it’s not worth it for some people or that nobody will do it, but giving up any seniority - be it global or seat - costs you QOL for awhile.
Reply
Old 08-11-2023 | 07:50 PM
  #118  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
'
That's like talking about growth at regionals a couple of years ago.
Net pilot growth for '22 and thus far in '23 for the LCC/ULCCs?
Hiring is not covering much more than attrition.
Given the large number of retirements and legacy growth over the next decade, this trend is not going to reverse any time soon.


I must say that it's very ironic to read that rapid upgrades are bad on the NK forum where there used to be rapid upgrades. Now? Not so much.
Hiring is definitely covering much more than attrition at my airline. We’ve grown by 25% in two years and will grow another 25% by the end of next year. Attrition is bad but 70% of pilots hired in the last two years are still here.

Your legacy growth isn’t all you make it out to be. Yes United has a large order but 3/5 airframes are just replacing old birds. Age 67 is another wildcard.
Reply
Old 08-12-2023 | 07:21 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Or, they economy and the industry could have one of its cyclical busts and the bottom 20% of all seniority lists could be looking hard for CFI jobs. Stranger things have happened.
You and guys like you have made that statement (economic downturn, furloughs, human sacrifice, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria) claim all through this mass hiring spree at legacies over the last 5+ years. And that mass hiring at legacies is going to continue for another decade, with or without an economic downturn.

You need to find a new boogey man to scare your fellow NKers from applying to the legacies.
Reply
Old 08-12-2023 | 07:52 AM
  #120  
DrSteveBrule's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: A320 For Your Health
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
You and guys like you have made that statement (economic downturn, furloughs, human sacrifice, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria) claim all through this mass hiring spree at legacies over the last 5+ years. And that mass hiring at legacies is going to continue for another decade, with or without an economic downturn.

You need to find a new boogey man to scare your fellow NKers from applying to the legacies.
Motives aside, you are an absurd human if you do not recognize how volatile this industry is. The only reason the industry didnt lose massive amounts of jobs in 2020 was big government subsidies. It should have happened. It will happen again. Dont be stupid.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Excargodog
Regional
131
11-17-2022 06:43 AM
BunkerF16
JetBlue
397
08-08-2022 02:03 PM
nwa757
Safety
9
05-08-2011 02:08 PM
juakyviolin
Flight Schools and Training
1
06-19-2008 09:43 AM
jet320
Major
2
10-20-2007 07:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices