![]() |
Originally Posted by 69fastback
(Post 3838251)
Sounds like it’s going to be ugly.
|
Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
(Post 3838258)
Sounds like? From where?
|
Originally Posted by CatPilot1
(Post 3838263)
This dude always has the leak on bad news. I believe him.
|
Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
(Post 3838258)
Sounds like? From where?
|
Originally Posted by BlueWater
(Post 3838269)
yes, where is this all of the sudden coming from?
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3838271)
It really isn’t all the sudden. The company is in big trouble so making moves they feel to be necessary, will be made. They don’t have the luxury to “wait and see”. Not when you are burning cash at their burn rate.
|
Originally Posted by BlueWater
(Post 3838278)
recently though they offered voluntary leaves, and some who applied were not approved. why not approve the LOAs?
|
Originally Posted by CatPilot1
(Post 3838279)
Maybe furloughs are better from an accounting standpoint?
|
Originally Posted by LongHornFlyer
(Post 3838284)
Then why reduce the original amount of furloughs?
|
Originally Posted by CatPilot1
(Post 3838287)
Maybe Alvarez and Marsal are calling the shots now.
My guess is the vacancy/displacement bid tomorrow will have an 8-K filed with the SEC too, on the reasoning for the moves. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands