![]() |
Will BRAVO take us to the promised land?
Will BRAVO return us to viability? Profitability?
or is this a short term play to get us through h bankruptcy with hopes of enticing a partner? |
Originally Posted by gonyon
(Post 3854187)
Will BRAVO return us to viability? Profitability?
or is this a short term play to get us through h bankruptcy with hopes of enticing a partner? |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854220)
Every non legacy will see consolidation in the next two years. Will we survive that long is anyone’s guess. Making money in 2027 as spirit is unlikely
|
Originally Posted by gonyon
(Post 3854187)
Will BRAVO return us to viability? Profitability?
or is this a short term play to get us through h bankruptcy with hopes of enticing a partner? sorry if I missed a union email, but what is BRAVO? Or are you talking about Johnny Bravo? |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3854289)
sorry if I missed a union email, but what is BRAVO? Or are you talking about Johnny Bravo?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...813_ex9902.htm Spirit airlines plan bravo |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3854289)
sorry if I missed a union email, but what is BRAVO? Or are you talking about Johnny Bravo?
And just my opinion, the union shouldn’t be sending out any company lofty “pie in the sky” changes to save the company. Save that propaganda fantasy land for the investment community. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854323)
Yeah, nothing given to the employees at all, SEC filing
And just my opinion, the union shouldn’t be sending out any company lofty “pie in the sky” changes to save the company. Save that propaganda fantasy land for the investment community. but why are they keeping him around? He got a $3.4 million bonus and he did absolutely nothing for the shareholders. I don’t even care about the employees or the customers because that’s not a company’s main concern. A company’s main concern is for the shareholders and he has done nothing for them. He’s lost almost all their money. what is the plan? they’ve gotta have a plan… no Board of Directors in their right mind would keep him around if he did have something up his sleeve. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3854355)
I don’t mean to turn this into an attack on TC,
but why are they keeping him around? He got a $3.4 million bonus and he did absolutely nothing for the shareholders. I don’t even care about the employees or the customers because that’s not a companies main concern. A company’s main concern is for the shareholders and he has done nothing for them. He’s lost almost all their money. what is the plan? And no, he has lost all of their money. Stock was $26 a share in 2022 when the F9/NK merger was announced, it’s trading .16 OTC currently. So a $50k investment then is worth $307 now. That’s losing all their money. But I’m glad the big stockholders lost their money on this. They had the solid F9 deal, they wanted to push it for the slightly larger payday of JBLU, know the DOJ had a stiffy for mergers. Look what happened. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854360)
$4.219m bonus. But who’s counting…
And no, he has lost all of their money. Stock was $26 a share in 2022 when the F9/NK merger was announced, it’s trading .16 OTC currently. So a $50k investment then is worth $307 now. That’s losing all their money. But I’m glad the big stockholders lost their money on this. They had the solid F9 deal, they wanted to push it for the slightly larger payday of JBLU, know the DOJ had a stiffy for mergers. Look what happened. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854365)
What makes you think they would’ve allowed the Frontier merger at the time other than Ted saying so. More money from JetBlue was the better deal. The Frontier would’ve been shot down for the very same reason had the DOJ sued which they would have.
We will never truly know, but the F9 deal was far from being a lay up with Biden's DOJ. At that point in time I doubt any merger had much of a chance. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854365)
What makes you think they would’ve allowed the Frontier merger at the time other than Ted saying so. More money from JetBlue was the better deal. The Frontier would’ve been shot down for the very same reason had the DOJ sued which they would have.
Better deal? Sure. More obstacles as said by almost everyone besides and including Ted, yes. Large shareholders rolled the dice for the larger payday, and it failed and they take the L on this. The DOJ is a joke, I wanted JBLU over F9, but also believe if it had stayed NK F9, we would have prevailed with the merger, lawsuit or not. But we will never know. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854403)
And we will never know. I do know I have a better chance bringing home a girl who is a 6 from the bar, versus an 8.
Better deal? Sure. More obstacles as said by almost everyone besides and including Ted, yes. Large shareholders rolled the dice for the larger payday, and it failed and they take the L on this. The DOJ is a joke, I wanted JBLU over F9, but also believe if it had stayed NK F9, we would have prevailed with the merger, lawsuit or not. But we will never know. |
My biggest concern about bravo is this prepackaged chapter 11 is only dealing with a portion of spirits total debt and obligations. NK will still be paying full price for aircraft leases and aircraft debt payments. If the traveling public doesn't buy into the new model quickly why would revenues suddenly be enough to cover operating expenses that haven't changed?
|
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3854427)
My biggest concern about bravo is this prepackaged chapter 11 is only dealing with a portion of spirits total debt and obligations. NK will still be paying full price for aircraft leases and aircraft debt payments. If the traveling public doesn't buy into the new model quickly why would revenues suddenly be enough to cover operating expenses that haven't changed?
The prepackaged chapter 11 was for debt coming due. They don’t not have the money to pay off the billion plus coming due, hence the filing. That was a way to deal with a “tomorrow problem” Now if the product they produce, Bravo or whatever you want to call it doesn’t resonate and allow profit, then that’s the ball game without a merger. That’s todays problem. But your correct that while everyone is talking about the Ch11 and the bonds, if they can’t make money on the product they are selling, that’s it. |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...ex9905_037.jpg
This is the key slide. It shows the pivot from $50-$150 fares to $200-$400 fares. If you do a little math, they are looking to dump $1 billion in revenue from their current customer base and pick up $1.5 billion from the new upmarket crowd. Put another way, they're basically looking to totally abandon their current customers and swap for a totally new group of consumers. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3854427)
My biggest concern about bravo is this prepackaged chapter 11 is only dealing with a portion of spirits total debt and obligations. NK will still be paying full price for aircraft leases and aircraft debt payments. If the traveling public doesn't buy into the new model quickly why would revenues suddenly be enough to cover operating expenses that haven't changed?
If they want to start negotiating with everyone else given the demand for aircraft around the world then the airline is done. Leaseholders can make more than we are already paying them so they sure aren’t going to take anything less and would probably be happy to repo their asset and make more on it elsewhere. Majority of the fleet is leased so that alone would kill it. The planes we have debt on same story. Maybe the court could assist in restructuring some of that debt but it would not be significant is my guess. Those banks would also be just fine repoing their asset as well. We also needed cash according to the bravo plan before profits could be realized and no one was going to give it to us so the bond holders did as part of the deal for their equity. The brovo plan looks doable if we seriously double down on customer service to change our image and fire all the like minded employees and contractors that can’t crack a smile and like to tell their coworkers to suck a dick on camera in public. The absolute ghetto hiring practices need to change if they want brovo to work. Most likely this is a stay of execution backed by our largest debt holders until we can make another merger happen so they can cash out. The Biden administration put a huge delay in this plan with their BS and cost a lot of union jobs in the process. Market disrupters have to have an exit at some point. The entire point of starting a business is to sell it one day. What do they think Spirit exists for? |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3854445)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...ex9905_037.jpg
This is the key slide. It shows the pivot from $50-$150 fares to $200-$400 fares. If you do a little math, they are looking to dump $1 billion in revenue from their current customer base and pick up $1.5 billion from the new upmarket crowd. Put another way, they're basically looking to totally abandon their current customers and swap for a totally new group of consumers. So much for Judge Young’s plan for low fare travel for low fare guests. This one’s for you |
I don't see it working....... but time will tell.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854455)
Yup. The literally have it printed on the slide.
So much for Judge Young’s plan for low fare travel for low fare guests. This one’s for you |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854460)
I personally don’t see the harm and swapping out the dollar general and Walmart crowd for the target crowd. After all the dollar general crowd isn’t paying the bills. Doing the same thing and expecting different outcomes is how we got here.
Sorry, I watch too much CNBC... |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854460)
I personally don’t see the harm and swapping out the dollar general and Walmart crowd for the target crowd. After all the dollar general crowd isn’t paying the bills. Doing the same thing and expecting different outcomes is how we got here.
But in the end, when our customer service consists of agents beating up passengers in BWI, or fighting with each other in PHL, that won’t work. Im amazed how we see this on a daily basis yet it manages to elude the C suite team. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854460)
I personally don’t see the harm and swapping out the dollar general and Walmart crowd for the target crowd. After all the dollar general crowd isn’t paying the bills. Doing the same thing and expecting different outcomes is how we got here.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854475)
Im all for it.
But in the end, when our customer service consists of agents beating up passengers in BWI, or fighting with each other in PHL, that won’t work. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3854478)
The harm is that they are dumping all their current customers and hoping the new ones show up. They only have a few quarters to pull it off before the cash runs out.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3854492)
In fairness, it usually looks like self defense.
The entire hood culture has to change. The actual language used, body language, and general decorum must change. We are hiring agents that talk to the guests like it’s someone on their block. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854509)
The current type of customer doesn’t pay enough for the business to be viable. They have to switch. The new plan may not work but the old plan definitely doesn’t
|
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3854445)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...ex9905_037.jpg
This is the key slide. It shows the pivot from $50-$150 fares to $200-$400 fares. If you do a little math, they are looking to dump $1 billion in revenue from their current customer base and pick up $1.5 billion from the new upmarket crowd. Put another way, they're basically looking to totally abandon their current customers and swap for a totally new group of consumers. Curious to know why they think they can upmarket without changing seat pitch and seat comfort. Those seem like the starting point. |
Originally Posted by gonyon
(Post 3854535)
Curious to know why they think they can upmarket without changing seat pitch and seat comfort. Those seem like the starting point.
|
Originally Posted by Tranquility
(Post 3854468)
Bad analogy; Target badly missed their quarter and their share has actually shifted to Walmart, which has up scaled their products while still keeping prices low. Then there's Amazon and Costco taking share too...
Sorry, I watch too much CNBC... |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 3854542)
That’s what the BFS and blocked middle premium seating are in the short term. From what I can tell seat pitch will supposedly change (at least in the premium section) starting in 2025. Along with in seat power? Who knows. I’ve yet to see this management team implement anything effectively. One would think in order to work these cabin configuration changes would need to take place in relatively short order so that higher end customers giving the new product a try wouldn’t get frustrated at an inconsistent product and bail back to the legacies.
|
Originally Posted by SlimBob
(Post 3854576)
I've noticed business travelers in the last month. Not more than normal or an uptick... But a group of guys in sport coats waiting to board that I've never seen before. And overhead space is running out. So maybe if we ditch the ratchet gate agents in certain cities we might be moving in the right direction. But eff the guy who squeezed millions from this place before the next batch of furloughs and zeroing out everyone's stocks. I just don't see how he's still here. If an ops guy were CEO that would be one thing but he's a bean counter and he sucks at it.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3854585)
Business travelers need reliability more than anything. Spirit’s lack of frequency between city pairs has always been a pain point.
Full or "normal" airline service to a city is at least three daily flights. Maybe two on Tue and Sat. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3854594)
Yeah the once a day, or only on Tue & Sat model only really works for leisure.
Full or "normal" airline service to a city is at least three dail flights. Maybe two on Tue and Sat. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3854585)
Business travelers need reliability more than anything. Spirit’s lack of frequency between city pairs has always been a pain point.
I know plenty who won’t fly us purely bc who they are surrounded be on the plane. People who have no idea how to act |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854600)
Crowded gate areas, uncouth gate agents and FAs, surrounded by low brow fellow passengers dressed ridiculously and using profanity are all pain points.
I know plenty who won’t fly us purely bc who they are surrounded be on the plane. People who have no idea how to act Simply, the he clientele Spirit is seeking won’t fly Spirit because its Spirit. Spirit needs a new name, period. The name Spirit is always the punchline, right before the drum fill “ba dum dum”. Pinnacle Airlines changed their name to Endeavor after emerging from Chapter 11. Spirit needs to do the same. Sadly, we don’t even have the cash to slap a new name on a plane. |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 3854598)
NK hasn’t done that for a long time. Frequency is still lacking but it’s more like 2-3 times per day in most cases not 1-3 times per week. You’re thinking of F9 and Allegiant. Sounds like they might move back to some of this but I would have to imagine that would be on leisure routes only.
|
Originally Posted by gonyon
(Post 3854187)
Will BRAVO return us to viability? Profitability?
or is this a short term play to get us through h bankruptcy with hopes of enticing a partner? |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3854600)
Crowded gate areas, uncouth gate agents and FAs, surrounded by low brow fellow passengers dressed ridiculously and using profanity are all pain points.
I know plenty who won’t fly us purely bc who they are surrounded be on the plane. People who have no idea how to act |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3854603)
Which is why you’ll never see business travel on us.
Simply, the he clientele Spirit is seeking won’t fly Spirit because its Spirit. Spirit needs a new name, period. The name Spirit is always the punchline, right before the drum fill “ba dum dum”. Pinnacle Airlines changed their name to Endeavor after emerging from Chapter 11. Spirit needs to do the same. Sadly, we don’t even have the cash to slap a new name on a plane. Sincerely, Ted's Beard |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3854633)
On average, I don’t notice a huge difference between AA and Spirit clientele. The only outlier is that there’s significantly more children on a leash at Spirit gates.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands