Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-08-2017, 05:51 AM   #1  
Wow...
Thread Starter
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Yoke in left hand
Posts: 2,108
Default CNN Money Article on Pilotless Planes...

Pilotless planes could save airlines billions. But would anyone fly? - Aug. 7, 2017

Taking pilots out of the cockpit could save airlines billions. But would anyone buy a ticket?
The aviation industry could save $35 billion a year by moving to pilotless planes, according to a new report from UBS. Just one problem: The same report warns that only 17% of travelers are willing to fly without a pilot.
UBS said that the technology required to operate remote-controlled planes could appear by 2025. Further advances beyond 2030 might result in automated business jets and helicopters, and finally commercial aircraft without pilots. [read more]
TheFly is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 12:43 PM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Subieguy14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Different day different plane
Posts: 166
Default

I could never see there being fully automated planes. There will always be a pilot, even with all these people talking about cargo companies using fully automated planes, What happens if something goes wrong the computer cant fix and the plane ends up in a neighborhood instead of a grass field 2 miles the other way?
Subieguy14 is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 12:48 PM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subieguy14 View Post
I could never see there being fully automated planes. There will always be a pilot, even with all these people talking about cargo companies using fully automated planes, What happens if something goes wrong the computer cant fix and the plane ends up in a neighborhood instead of a grass field 2 miles the other way?
This is one of the questions no advocate of "pilotless" planes can answer.
C130driver is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 02:02 PM   #4  
Wow...
Thread Starter
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Yoke in left hand
Posts: 2,108
Default

Agreed and agreed. However, the fact that airlines and aircraft manufacturers are pursuing it with vigor means a lot.
TheFly is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 04:25 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Subieguy14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Different day different plane
Posts: 166
Default

I guess in CEO's eyes, money is more important than people.....
Subieguy14 is offline  
Old 08-09-2017, 06:11 AM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFly View Post
Agreed and agreed. However, the fact that airlines and aircraft manufacturers are pursuing it with vigor means a lot.
Which airlines are persuing it? Last time I checked every Airbus and Boeing ordered has 2 pilots in their cockpits. We are still flying 40 year old technology, and there has been no talk of the next Boeing or Airbus having less than 2 pilots.
C130driver is offline  
Old 08-09-2017, 06:33 AM   #7  
Wow...
Thread Starter
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Yoke in left hand
Posts: 2,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Which airlines are persuing it? Last time I checked every Airbus and Boeing ordered has 2 pilots in their cockpits. We are still flying 40 year old technology, and there has been no talk of the next Boeing or Airbus having less than 2 pilots.
When have commercial aircraft manufacturers not based their products on what the airlines want? Previous articles have mentioned it, but very quietly.
TheFly is offline  
Old 08-10-2017, 12:05 AM   #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 18
Default

What ever supposed savings could be made by flying without pilots would soon be lost by a downfall in cash flow due to the theoretical 83% of people who would choose not to fly on a pilotless plane...Also unlikely that much of the savings from having no pilots would result in a dramatically lower ticket price.

Might see single pilot airliners at some stage, the job might change a bit, but i wouldn't be too worried of a pilotless jet if i was in the shoes of a new pilot starting out today.

With all the talk by the techies that 50% of jobs or whatever the number will be replaced by robots in the next however many of years. It'd be more likely that pilots and airline staff would lose to jobs to airline revenue decreasing due to mass unemployment-no disposable income for holidays/airline tickets- layoffs at the airlines, which then comes around full circle with the question being asked- whats the point of automating most jobs anyway when people end up having less and eventually no money to spend?.
360nki is offline  
Old 08-10-2017, 08:06 AM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 4,607
Default

CNN said yesterday that a B1B could fly as high as 30,000 ft. so there is that.
badflaps is online now  
Old 08-13-2017, 02:30 PM   #10  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 13
Default

I'm a bit late to the party on this thread.

The public will go wherever the cheapest flights are. They'll soon forget about the lack of pilots up front if it saves them a few dollars.

Of course the irony of the CNN article is that pilotless aircraft won't be cheaper. Why are Airbus and Boeing still using a lot of 60s and 70s technology on their aircraft? The answer is that it is prohibitively expensive to get the new technology through the regulators approval processes.

Then there is the issue of liability. Pilotless aircraft are every ambulance chasing lawyer's wet dream. Us pilots are quite handy scapegoats when an aircraft goes down in the ocean, but what if the aircraft is pilotless? Who takes the wrap then? The media and lawyers want a scalp when there is an air crash, so they'll come after airline management or the aircraft manufacturer management.

I think what we are more likely to see is much greater levels of automation, overseen by pilots on ever decreasing wages, and receiving less and less training.
Awesome Wells is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passenger Planes Sit Idle Because No Pilots Want To Fly Them. Ellen Regional 82 12-17-2011 12:52 PM
Almaty & OLD Money FlybyKnite Cargo 5 03-14-2008 11:43 PM
The true value of money SkyHigh Hangar Talk 20 11-27-2006 07:42 AM
Money and time PearlPilot Flight Schools and Training 2 08-13-2006 12:18 PM
NWA seeks to trim 100-some planes Sir James Major 1 10-09-2005 07:08 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:39 PM.