Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
x-wind landings on big jets >

x-wind landings on big jets

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

x-wind landings on big jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2009, 04:07 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captscott26's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 944
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
The A-320 is the first and only airplane I've ever flown where I've hit the control stops with the stick in all four directions on one landing within 50 feet of the ground. Not the norm mind you but until you get accustomed to it the 320 can be a bit disconcerting in a strong gusty crosswind.
It's also the only airplane I have ever flown that you run out of aileron way before you run out of rudder in a strong x-wind. Its pretty interesting the first few crosswind landings, but you get the hang of it. Since you are dealing with flight control laws, the aircraft will not allow a sideslip above 50 ft RA. Below 50 ft the computers essentially give the pilot "normal" control, or what you would be used to in any other aircraft. So basically, kick it and stick it!
captscott26 is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 05:48 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by captscott26 View Post
It's also the only airplane I have ever flown that you run out of aileron way before you run out of rudder in a strong x-wind. Its pretty interesting the first few crosswind landings, but you get the hang of it. Since you are dealing with flight control laws, the aircraft will not allow a sideslip above 50 ft RA. Below 50 ft the computers essentially give the pilot "normal" control, or what you would be used to in any other aircraft. So basically, kick it and stick it!
I was landing in Boston last week on Runway 27. A jetBlue was in front of us. We had extremely high wind gusts and crosswinds. The jetBlue had to go around. At the time we thought perhaps they weren't worthy pilots. But, after seeing what you just posted about the Airbus, I'm glad they did go around if it got ugly on them.

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 05:53 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
In the DC-10, if you crab into the wind and then kick the rudder in the flare, you better be add simultaneous aileron into the wind. Otherwise, you will get a pronounced rolling moment in the direction of the wind which will cause you to strike a wing, pod, or go off the runway. I have also found that once the main gear touch down and the spoilers kick up, you will need even more aileron into the wind to keep that up-wind wing down.

We had a KC-10 go off the runway and one of the contributing factors was "relaxing" of the crosswind controls. They didn't take them out completely, they just let some out. Given other factors in the accident, that was enough to send them off the runway.
I haven't flown a ton of swept-wing aircraft, but the roll is there for everything down to a 152. There's a limitation for the 170 as well (something like 17 degrees bank) but I can't recall if it's for the engine or the wingtip. Either way, I don't want to find out the hard way.

It's interesting to hear about the other types of aircraft out there. I had a mainline guy in the jumpseat one day and asked why the 737 in front of me looked like it was taxiing sideways. I got to learn that the mains castor a bit to help avoid dragging an engine by allowing to land in a crab. Any other types have something like this?
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 08:21 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 825
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
I haven't flown a ton of swept-wing aircraft, but the roll is there for everything down to a 152. There's a limitation for the 170 as well (something like 17 degrees bank) but I can't recall if it's for the engine or the wingtip. Either way, I don't want to find out the hard way.

It's interesting to hear about the other types of aircraft out there. I had a mainline guy in the jumpseat one day and asked why the 737 in front of me looked like it was taxiing sideways. I got to learn that the mains castor a bit to help avoid dragging an engine by allowing to land in a crab. Any other types have something like this?
Hell yeah, the mighty B-52. Our crosswind crab system is sick. We're wider than we're long, therefore no wing low method on that old bastard. 20 degree maximum gear prepositioning from centerline...which gives a max demonstrated x-wind component of 42KTS.

It messes with your head the first couple of times, trying to effectively land a crane, visualizing crab angles that put the aft gear that's 80 feet behind you effectively several dozen feet to the left or right of your seating position; having to force yourself to shoot for a cockpit position so many widths left or right of centerline to effect an overall centered landing position in the runway. If the crab is pronounced enough (in the high teens) to warrant having to see through the other pilot's nugget, most pilots elect to allow the pilot downind of the crab to land the crane, er, the airplane. Taxiing crabbed down the runway is another gem....and correcting for any drift you allowed while over the threshold on the flare while adequately compensating for the aforementioned geometry considerations is a little puzzling at first, to say the least.

Other than that, the 8 different assymetries of individual engines, flap retractions that resemble closing stadium roofs, ridiculous aerodynamic effects during air refueling due to having longer wings than the tanker, helicopter-style cockpit sight picture during lightweight pattern work due to built-in 8 degrees positive angle of incidence on the wing root (that's right, a whole lot nose down on the ADI gives you level flight) and an artificial feel control system designed to resemble control pressures of a B-36 because the hydraulic assist was making the old dudes over-G it back in the day (i.e. they incorporated unnecessarily fatiguing control forces to fly it manually for hours, for the benefit of people crossflowing in from the old big momma bomber), it flies just like your run of the mill airplane, pull-push houses get smaller get bigger type stuff.... It's a vintage experience, so it's all good.
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 09:20 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Good stuff. I've seen pictures of the BUFF doing those crabbed landings. Amazing that three generations have flown that jet, and over 50 years of technology have yet to replace it. What a magnificent beast.

On a sidenote, does the guy endoing the second mountain bike in your avatar have any significance or is it just a funny pic?
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 10:36 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
I haven't flown a ton of swept-wing aircraft, but the roll is there for everything down to a 152. There's a limitation for the 170 as well (something like 17 degrees bank) but I can't recall if it's for the engine or the wingtip. Either way, I don't want to find out the hard way.

It's interesting to hear about the other types of aircraft out there. I had a mainline guy in the jumpseat one day and asked why the 737 in front of me looked like it was taxiing sideways. I got to learn that the mains castor a bit to help avoid dragging an engine by allowing to land in a crab. Any other types have something like this?
On big airplanes, you also have a very large body force, that is the wind blowing up against the fuselage. That also will push you to the downwind side and help with the rolling moment if you don't apply crosswind controls.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 07:53 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 135
Default Strong X-wind Landing Video

After seeing this video I have great respect for just how strong these gear are and the amount of side-loading they can withstand.

YouTube - Cross wind landings boeing 777


Joe
Avg Joe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCFLYR
Leaving the Career
62
09-01-2009 08:50 AM
DreamAir
Flight Schools and Training
4
01-07-2009 05:50 PM
vagabond
Corporate
23
01-03-2009 06:14 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
8
10-30-2008 12:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
17
09-15-2008 10:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices