Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Descent Planning

Old 04-27-2011, 09:46 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Default Descent Planning

Hello all.

I am finding that a common question in airline interviewing comes in the form of something like:

Code:
You are at FL240 and need to descend to FL180. When do you begin your descent?
To me, this question is confusing because it seems to lack information like ground speed and rate of descent. I understand how to plan a descent with information including amount of altitude to lose, rate of descent, and ground-speed, but I guess I am missing something here.

Can someone explain this typical question and how 121 interviewers are expecting you to head-compute it?

Thank you.
ddd333 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 09:57 AM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Pistons can normally use 3-5 times their altitude to be lost. Jets should use a slightly larger multiple (jet folks chime in).

Ex. 1

FL24 down to FL18 = need to lose 6k.
6 x 5 = 30 nm as your TOD (top of descent point).

That rule is good for rough calculations, but sometimes you want to descend at 500 fpm rather than guess. Then use this:
2 times your GS in miles per minute in the descent x altitude to be lost in thousands.

Ex. 2

If speed in the descent is to be 120 kts over the ground, then 2 nm-per-minute and you want to descend 6000 ft:
2 x (2) miles per minute x 6 (altitude to be lost) = 24 nm
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 10:26 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

3 miles for every thousand feet usually works well.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 10:42 AM
  #4  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

3:1 ratio works well for jets. Ex. If you need to lose 10,000 feet, you'd start down 30 miles from the fix. Vertical rate is GS dependent, if they give you GS, you can calculate time to fix, then divide altitde to lose by time to the fix.

If the interviewer is just checking basic mental math, just answer the question and don't try to second guess. It's rare to find a multi variable mental math problem in an interview so don't over think it. These questions are also a good segue into discussions about Econ decents vs. Crossing restrictions, etc.

Practice base 6 math, it comes in handy in an interview.

If they have a sense of humor, you might try - auto pilot off, FLCH, green arc on the fix.
HSLD is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 01:11 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

I recently interviewed at a Part 121 on demand freight operation... part of their process was a 60 question complex math test ...timed... answer as many as you can in 20 minutes...... some questions were aviation related... but most were complex calculations, meaning.. do one calc, then another.. then use the answers from those two to actually do another and answer the question.... I completed 30 questions... the two people who interviewed with me answered 15 and 18..... they were not overly difficult just complex and you had to be sure to read the whole question before you tried to compute the answer. It was quite challenging. I asked the Dir of Trng why they gave such a test, he said they felt there was a correlation in being able to answer questions like that under a time constraint and good decision making in the aircraft...ymmv.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 01:22 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Default

Without specific information, plan 3:1. FL240 to FL180 is 6000 ft x 3= 18nm.

to cover any other variables they might give:
At a ground speed of 420KTS that's 7miles per minute. It takes about 2.5 min to cover 18NM. To lose 6000ft in 2.5min you need to descent at about 2500fpm.
viper548 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 07:18 PM
  #7  
Tuk er jerbs!
 
NightIP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: B747 Left
Posts: 1,342
Default

Groundspeed * 5 is a good gouge for rate of descent at 3:1. It's not perfect, but it's enough to get you in the ballpark.
NightIP is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 04:40 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
propjunkie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: E-170
Posts: 173
Default 3:1 Rule

altitude to lose (in thousands) x 3 = dme to start down

G/S divided by 2, add a 0 = FPM required for 3:1 calculation. (also works for FPM required for glideslopes)

example: you are 24000 need to cross nesto at 10000. Groundspeed is 420

14 x 3 = 42nm

420 / 2 = 210 add zero 2,100 FPM

start down at 42nm and use 2100 fpm

make sure to increase descent rate when GS increases

Last edited by propjunkie; 04-28-2011 at 11:48 AM.
propjunkie is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:14 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bertengineer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Front
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by propjunkie View Post
altitude to lose (in hundreds) x 3 = dme to start down

G/S divided by 2, add a 0 = FPM required for 3:1 calculation.

example: you are 24000 need to cross nesto at 10000. Groundspeed is 420

14 x 3 = 42nm

420 / 2 = 210 add zero 2,100 FPM

start down at 42nm and use 2100 fpm

make sure to increase descent rate when GS increases
Hell yeah! This is what I use and teach to the knuckle heads in the right seat, although "Rule of thumb or technique only!".
bertengineer is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 07:23 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: SA227, left seat
Posts: 109
Talking

[QUOTE=propjunkie;986536]altitude to lose (in hundreds) x 3 = dme to start down

14 x 3 = 42nm

This should say (in thousands), right? Otherwise, you need to start 15 miles out to lose 500 feet.

Great calculation, and easy to use. I'll be teaching this from now on. Thanks.
jcrews is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OceanicPilot
Technical
5
05-11-2010 08:07 PM
Adlerdriver
Hangar Talk
13
01-19-2009 11:21 AM
ConnectionPilot
Flight Schools and Training
1
12-19-2006 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices