Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Flap Malfunction in 172 >

Flap Malfunction in 172


Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Flap Malfunction in 172

Old 07-20-2013 | 03:14 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Default

I think slips should be avoided with 40 flaps, and if slips are done make the slips very gentle not rough.
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 03:22 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Default

I think at altitude it would present a problem?
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 04:20 AM
  #13  
N9373M's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: 127.0.0.1
Default

Originally Posted by Bellanca
Does anybody know if this has anything to do with why 172's are placarded with something along the lines of "slips with flaps should be avoided"?
IIRC, flaps 40 and a slip could block the airflow over the elevator, causing an abrupt drop of the nose. No bueno close to the ground.
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 05:56 AM
  #14  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Originally Posted by N9373M
IIRC, flaps 40 and a slip could block the airflow over the elevator, causing an abrupt drop of the nose. No bueno close to the ground.
I am gonna call myth-busters on this idea of a nose drop for these older Cessnas with the 40 flaps. I have never seen any proof of it. Tail blanking does occur, where turbulent or dead air causes light buffeting as the turbulent air from the flaps bumps around on the tail a little bit. But this is not the same as tail stall. It might be possible with some combination of conditions like forward CG, gross weight, crosswinds, and aggressive maneuvering, but I have never heard of any accidents from that cause.

That said, there are plenty of good reasons to avoid the 40 flaps on electric models. Go-arounds are difficult, there is a risk of wing stall due and mis-trim given complete flap retraction, and you can get extra drag for steep approaches by forward slipping. The older models with the jack bar were ok because you could change flap settings quickly on those models. Too bad they gave that feature up to get more interior room.
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 10:59 AM
  #15  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

I can confirm the tail blanking in a 172N model with 40 degrees flap, definately an experience.

I had a right side flap cable break on a C310, but couldn't confirm until I was on the ground. I did however think initially it was an engine failure because of the rolling and no other changes, then as I was performing the 'recovery' it hit me what was happening, I retracted the flaps and she flew just fine.
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 11:58 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 5
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
I am gonna call myth-busters on this idea of a nose drop for these older Cessnas with the 40 flaps. I have never seen any proof of it. Tail blanking does occur, where turbulent or dead air causes light buffeting as the turbulent air from the flaps bumps around on the tail a little bit. But this is not the same as tail stall. It might be possible with some combination of conditions like forward CG, gross weight, crosswinds, and aggressive maneuvering, but I have never heard of any accidents from that cause.
Agreed. In fact, I seem to recall slipping with F40 was never a limitation, just a "not recommended" maneuver. The reason being that it would create buffeting. I did them many times with students, and never experienced a tail stall or anything abrupt like that. If that were even a possibility, it would be a very well known limitation.
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 05:25 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
Default

Even the new cessna R and S models have that placard next to the flaps, and they only have 30 degrees of flaps
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 05:30 PM
  #18  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 42
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
I am gonna call myth-busters on this idea of a nose drop for these older Cessnas with the 40 flaps.
Agreed. You aren't supposed to slip for long with low gas in one tank, because you might run out of gas, but I've done lots and lots of approaches with 40 degrees flaps and slips. I can say that at least once I did feel what seemed like "tail buffeting", but per the relevant manual, there was no loss of control or other ill effects. If this was a limitation...well, it would be a limitation...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
39
12-21-2018 06:57 AM
emb145captain
Fractional
32
03-05-2009 02:25 PM
DiputadoVolador
Hangar Talk
8
02-26-2008 06:43 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
20
11-19-2007 11:42 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
6
10-19-2007 07:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices