Flap Malfunction in 172
#1
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Yesterday I was flying vfr and headed inbound to the airport, I proceeded to make a simulated fire emergency landing. I ran the checklist then I put twenty degrees of flaps in on downwind and then thirty on base. I noticed I was a little bit high, I slipped the airplane right and then heard a popping sound. The speed I put the flaps down was at normal flap operating speed. I looked over and the left flap was up and the right one was down. My first reaction when I heard the pop was something just broke, and then I saw what was going on. I was about 200 feet high and coming down to the threshold. I was thinking about putting the flaps up but then I decided not to because the airplane was still flying well. I made the landing and the cable to the left wing flap had broken. Any suggestions on configuring the airplane or leaving it like it was in the air?
#2
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I think the conventional wisdom with a flight control malfunction (flaps are secondary flight controls) is to follow the QRH/emergency procedure if your SOP or AFM provides one.
If no procedure is available and the airplane is controllable, don't change configuration and keep airspeed as constant as reasonably can. Avoid sudden power or A/S changes. You did the right thing...if you had tried to raise the flaps that loose cable might have gotten involved with something you really needed, like the aileron mechanism.
If no procedure is available and the airplane is controllable, don't change configuration and keep airspeed as constant as reasonably can. Avoid sudden power or A/S changes. You did the right thing...if you had tried to raise the flaps that loose cable might have gotten involved with something you really needed, like the aileron mechanism.
#3
Well you were probably smart for leaving a flying airplane alone, if you had retracted flaps you would have encountered a high sink close to the ground, so you did the best thing. Squawk it to the club and count it as a learning experience. You'll get much worse in your flying career- smoke, fire, and losing an engine are far more exciting.
#5
The plane broke, and you were cognizant of it's handling capabilities (controllable). Who knows what would have happened if you raised the flaps.
Had a similar experience in an older 172 doing T/Gos and the flaps stayed at 40' on the go. I did raise them after landing per the checklist, which irked maint as they wanted to "see" the flap lever at 0 and the actual flaps at 40.
Had a similar experience in an older 172 doing T/Gos and the flaps stayed at 40' on the go. I did raise them after landing per the checklist, which irked maint as they wanted to "see" the flap lever at 0 and the actual flaps at 40.
#6
Slightly off the current topic, but care should be taken not to retract to less than a 20 flap setting on go-arounds in older Cessna singles with the 40 flap angle and no flap detents. That system allows a continuous flap retraction to a nose-high attitude which could easily lead to a stall. Flap retraction shifts the effective chord line up at the rear sending the tail down and the AoA up. Never go less than 20 until forward speed is regained to at least 55 knots (see POH).
#7
Slightly off the current topic, but care should be taken not to retract to less than a 20 flap setting on go-arounds in older Cessna singles with the 40 flap angle and no flap detents. That system allows a continuous flap retraction to a nose-high attitude which could easily lead to a stall. Flap retraction shifts the effective chord line up at the rear sending the tail down and the AoA up. Never go less than 20 until forward speed is regained to at least 55 knots (see POH).
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
First, good job.
Was there a bunch of rolling caused by only having one flap?? I've always kinda wondered what the airplane would do and how bad it would be, and I've heard stories from other CFI's, who probably heard stories from other CFI's, about people getting split flap conditions and almost completely losing control.
Does anybody know if this has anything to do with why 172's are placarded with something along the lines of "slips with flaps should be avoided"?
Was there a bunch of rolling caused by only having one flap?? I've always kinda wondered what the airplane would do and how bad it would be, and I've heard stories from other CFI's, who probably heard stories from other CFI's, about people getting split flap conditions and almost completely losing control.
Does anybody know if this has anything to do with why 172's are placarded with something along the lines of "slips with flaps should be avoided"?
#10
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Actually there wasn't to mcuh of a roll, I always thought if that happened it would make a roll. Maybe I was close enogh to the ground that ground effect helped out some, it felt like it was pulling some to the right on the flare but seemed like normal. It's an older 172 and I don't think that 40 flaps would be recommended even in a emergency with the stuff I've know read. What do you think?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



