Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Flap Malfunction in 172 >

Flap Malfunction in 172

Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Flap Malfunction in 172

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2013 | 07:09 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Default Flap Malfunction in 172

Yesterday I was flying vfr and headed inbound to the airport, I proceeded to make a simulated fire emergency landing. I ran the checklist then I put twenty degrees of flaps in on downwind and then thirty on base. I noticed I was a little bit high, I slipped the airplane right and then heard a popping sound. The speed I put the flaps down was at normal flap operating speed. I looked over and the left flap was up and the right one was down. My first reaction when I heard the pop was something just broke, and then I saw what was going on. I was about 200 feet high and coming down to the threshold. I was thinking about putting the flaps up but then I decided not to because the airplane was still flying well. I made the landing and the cable to the left wing flap had broken. Any suggestions on configuring the airplane or leaving it like it was in the air?
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 07:21 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

I think the conventional wisdom with a flight control malfunction (flaps are secondary flight controls) is to follow the QRH/emergency procedure if your SOP or AFM provides one.

If no procedure is available and the airplane is controllable, don't change configuration and keep airspeed as constant as reasonably can. Avoid sudden power or A/S changes. You did the right thing...if you had tried to raise the flaps that loose cable might have gotten involved with something you really needed, like the aileron mechanism.
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 07:22 AM
  #3  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Well you were probably smart for leaving a flying airplane alone, if you had retracted flaps you would have encountered a high sink close to the ground, so you did the best thing. Squawk it to the club and count it as a learning experience. You'll get much worse in your flying career- smoke, fire, and losing an engine are far more exciting.
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 08:36 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Default

Thanks, I was thinking along the same lines about sinking down to fast, and if the airplane was still flying leave it alone.
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 09:34 AM
  #5  
N9373M's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: 127.0.0.1
Default Agree

The plane broke, and you were cognizant of it's handling capabilities (controllable). Who knows what would have happened if you raised the flaps.

Had a similar experience in an older 172 doing T/Gos and the flaps stayed at 40' on the go. I did raise them after landing per the checklist, which irked maint as they wanted to "see" the flap lever at 0 and the actual flaps at 40.
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 10:15 AM
  #6  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Slightly off the current topic, but care should be taken not to retract to less than a 20 flap setting on go-arounds in older Cessna singles with the 40 flap angle and no flap detents. That system allows a continuous flap retraction to a nose-high attitude which could easily lead to a stall. Flap retraction shifts the effective chord line up at the rear sending the tail down and the AoA up. Never go less than 20 until forward speed is regained to at least 55 knots (see POH).
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 10:35 AM
  #7  
N9373M's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: 127.0.0.1
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Slightly off the current topic, but care should be taken not to retract to less than a 20 flap setting on go-arounds in older Cessna singles with the 40 flap angle and no flap detents. That system allows a continuous flap retraction to a nose-high attitude which could easily lead to a stall. Flap retraction shifts the effective chord line up at the rear sending the tail down and the AoA up. Never go less than 20 until forward speed is regained to at least 55 knots (see POH).
I was a relatively new PPL at that time and knew that there were issues with 40' flaps in the older 172s - that's why they are now limited to 30'. I was somewhat uncomfortable (ok, scared) on that go around with 40' of flaps hanging out.
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 03:30 PM
  #8  
Hrkdrivr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Fairly local
Default

Good job landing safely. I'm amazed it was controllable with one flap at 30 and the other at 0. Was it trying to roll hard?
Reply
Old 07-19-2013 | 07:54 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
Default

First, good job.

Was there a bunch of rolling caused by only having one flap?? I've always kinda wondered what the airplane would do and how bad it would be, and I've heard stories from other CFI's, who probably heard stories from other CFI's, about people getting split flap conditions and almost completely losing control.

Originally Posted by TylerbPilot11
I noticed I was a little bit high, I slipped the airplane right and then heard a popping sound.
Does anybody know if this has anything to do with why 172's are placarded with something along the lines of "slips with flaps should be avoided"?
Reply
Old 07-20-2013 | 03:12 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Left seat BE76
Default

Actually there wasn't to mcuh of a roll, I always thought if that happened it would make a roll. Maybe I was close enogh to the ground that ground effect helped out some, it felt like it was pulling some to the right on the flare but seemed like normal. It's an older 172 and I don't think that 40 flaps would be recommended even in a emergency with the stuff I've know read. What do you think?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
39
12-21-2018 06:57 AM
emb145captain
Fractional
32
03-05-2009 02:25 PM
DiputadoVolador
Hangar Talk
8
02-26-2008 06:43 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
20
11-19-2007 11:42 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
6
10-19-2007 07:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices