![]() |
Why does the Airbus STOP on the runway?
I've noticed a number of Airbus (cargo and passenger) that will literally come to a complete stop on the runway after landing.
During busy pushes, this can really lead to some excitement in the Tower. :eek: The Local and Ground Controllers are often coordinating with each other to have a landing aircraft follow a taxiing aircraft at a specific intersection; there might be another landing aircraft on short final or the Tower Controller might have an aircraft slotted for immediate takeoff. When an aircraft comes to a complete stop on the runway, we are wonding what is happening out there. The aircraft then comes up on the power and slowly inches off the runway -- while the Local Controller sits poised with his thumb on the mike button waiting for the "GO AROUND!" or "CLEARED FOR IMMEDIATE TAKEOFF!" command to be transmitted. Can someone shed some light on the subject? It's always an Airbus. MEM_ATC NOTE: Crossposted to "Majors" forum. |
Cause they're underbuilt French pieces of sh*t.. but other than that I dont know :D
|
Originally Posted by MEM_ATC
(Post 91197)
I've noticed a number of Airbus (cargo and passenger) that will literally come to a complete stop on the runway after landing.
During busy pushes, this can really lead to some excitement in the Tower. :eek: The Local and Ground Controllers are often coordinating with each other to have a landing aircraft follow a taxiing aircraft at a specific intersection; there might be another landing aircraft on short final or the Tower Controller might have an aircraft slotted for immediate takeoff. When an aircraft comes to a complete stop on the runway, we are wonding what is happening out there. The aircraft then comes up on the power and slowly inches off the runway -- while the Local Controller sits poised with his thumb on the mike button waiting for the "GO AROUND!" or "CLEARED FOR IMMEDIATE TAKEOFF!" command to be transmitted. Can someone shed some light on the subject? It's always an Airbus. MEM_ATC NOTE: Crossposted to "Majors" forum. |
The max taxi speed for a 90 degree turn is 10 kts. It may look like a stop, but it not required.
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91198)
Cause they're underbuilt French pieces of sh*t.. but other than that I dont know :D
My guess to the answer of the original question is also the 10kt limitation for 90 degree turns - it probably looks like a full stop but it really isn't. |
ummmm, he said underbuilt
|
I'm too lazy to repost.See Major forum.:o
|
Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
(Post 91273)
I don't know for sure, but it could be the autobrakes. I know I have forgotten about them (first transitioning into the ac), and a few others have too! The airbus' autobrakes will bring the aircraft to a COMPLETE STOP if you forget to push the brake pedals to de-activate them (usually around 70 knots for us). I did it once in LGA, but at the last second, remembered to push the pedals, so didn't come to a complete stop, but close enough to make the Captain, and I am sure the contoller, a little "puckered".
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91198)
Cause they're underbuilt French pieces of sh*t.. but other than that I dont know :D
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91198)
Cause they're underbuilt French pieces of sh*t.. but other than that I dont know :D
|
The Airbus 300-600 is a great jet. The A-310 a little less so. If the autobrake selection is in Max, the jet stops so quickly that it might actually come to a complete stop before the autobrakes are released by the crew. The first time I had a landing with Max selected, it stopped so quickly, I didn't even have time to deploy the reversers. It's an eye opening experience.
As a side issue, ECAM is way better than any alert driven system (that Boeing makes), because the jet at all times knows what problems it has and presents, in plain english, the correct checklist as well as the schematic of the system involved, so that when you press a tile and move a valve, you can actually see that valve move. Very cool and very smart. You've gotta remember that these Airbuses were built for 3rd world nations to fly. So a guy could actually park his camel (as an example), and climb into and fly an airbus. The Boeing and MD products all require much more system knowledge, which can be a good thing, or a very bad thing at 3 AM after having flown all night. |
Originally Posted by AVIVIII
(Post 91265)
ummmm, he said underbuilt
|
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91287)
i like flying this POS..and props are for boats!!!!!!
And the tail has never fallen off the SAAB yet. Maybe it's just me.. I kinda like when the tail stays intact with the rest of the fuselage, make the plane much easier to fly POS french airplane ! |
Steve, you wanted to say medium...
Originally Posted by Jetjok
(Post 91294)
The Airbus 300-600 is a great jet. The A-310 a little less so. If the autobrake selection is in Max, the jet stops so quickly that it might actually come to a complete stop before the autobrakes are released by the crew. The first time I had a landing with Max selected, it stopped so quickly, I didn't even have time to deploy the reversers. It's an eye opening experience.
As a side issue, ECAM is way better than any alert driven system (that Boeing makes), because the jet at all times knows what problems it has and presents, in plain english, the correct checklist as well as the schematic of the system involved, so that when you press a tile and move a valve, you can actually see that valve move. Very cool and very smart. You've gotta remember that these Airbuses were built for 3rd world nations to fly. So a guy could actually park his camel (as an example), and climb into and fly an airbus. The Boeing and MD products all require much more system knowledge, which can be a good thing, or a very bad thing at 3 AM after having flown all night. Uh, Jetjok... I think you mean to say land with Medium autobrakes, right? If you landed with Max, we would have ALL heard about it on another forum.;) |
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91325)
Jets are for jacuzzi's :D
And the tail has never fallen off the SAAB yet. Maybe it's just me.. I kinda like when the tail stays intact with the rest of the fuselage, make the plane much easier to fly POS french airplane ! |
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91331)
yeah.. and this jacuzzi pays in a month what your little flying chock pays in a year..go back to the regional board little boy
|
hey kilofoodstamp...i found this...
Saab 340 FO $35/hr....A300/310 CPT $220/hr...i'll risk the tail falling off! |
And you're how old?? I should hope you're making some money finally.
I have to be less than half your age old man.. maybe all that Viagra is going to your head. Not too much your old @ss balls can say to that now huh? |
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91334)
hey kilofoodstamp...i found this...
Saab 340 FO $35/hr....A300/310 CPT $220/hr...i'll risk the tail falling off! |
sorry kilofoodstamp..i am 37..probably younger than you...so i would like to help you..please see the link below
http://www.coppinc.com/ |
Originally Posted by Airbusdriver
(Post 91326)
Uh, Jetjok... I think you mean to say land with Medium autobrakes, right? If you landed with Max, we would have ALL heard about it on another forum.;)
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91325)
Jets are for jacuzzi's :D
And the tail has never fallen off the SAAB yet. Maybe it's just me.. I kinda like when the tail stays intact with the rest of the fuselage, make the plane much easier to fly POS french airplane ! |
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91338)
sorry kilofoodstamp..i am 37..probably younger than you...so i would like to help you..please see the link below
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91198)
Cause they're underbuilt French pieces of sh*t.. but other than that I dont know :D
|
Unfounded? have you been living in a hole?
The tail literally came off an American A300 in flight. All that was left were the mounting bolts. Check it out for yourself http://www.ntsb.gov/events/2001/AA587/default.htm http://www.airsafe.com/events/aa587.htm http://www.airdisaster.com/cvr/aa587.shtml |
Captain Mark
Mark, I'm wondering if you are really a pilot or you play with Flight Sim all day? I can't believe you are acting this way over an Airbus comment. I would have expected this on that other forum with pictures but not here. Can't we all just get along?
|
It's great how a 40 something guy got involved in a "my airplane is better than yours" debate. What a tool.
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91335)
I have to be less than half your age old man.. C = CaptainMark's age K < ½ C
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91338)
i am 37 K < ½ 37 K < 18.5
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91345)
I'm 23, so once again you are quite wrong 23 < 18.5 ????? Must be that new math. . |
Mine's bigger than yours!
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91365)
It's great how a 40 something guy got involved in a "my airplane is better than yours" debate. What a tool.
|
Glad that a 37 year old with your maturity is flying the blender I bought my grandmother for christmas around and not my family.
Calm down. These peeing matches are getting old for those of us who have learned to stay out of them. |
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 91377)
K = KiloAlpha's age
C = CaptainMark's age K < ½ C C = 37 K < ½ 37 K < 18.5 K = 23 23 < 18.5 ????? Must be that new math. . Tony, what about dog years? Mark is a freight dawg and Kilo is not. I'm too tired to do the math but add in the 7 year to every one equation for dog years. Your better than "the great big book of everything" I really enjoy your knowledgable posts. |
Originally Posted by Soyathink
(Post 91395)
Tony, what about dog years? So, Mark... how long ya been a dog? :D . |
Originally Posted by MWright
(Post 91394)
These peeing matches are getting old for those of us who have learned to stay out of them. :rolleyes: . |
Originally Posted by CaptainMark
(Post 91331)
yeah.. and this jacuzzi pays in a month what your little flying chock pays in a year..go back to the regional board little boy
|
Originally Posted by MWright
(Post 91394)
Glad that a 37 year old with your maturity is flying the blender I bought my grandmother for christmas around and not my family.
Calm down. These peeing matches are getting old for those of us who have learned to stay out of them. |
these threads have been boring of late... !
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91361)
Unfounded? have you been living in a hole?
The tail literally came off an American A300 in flight. All that was left were the mounting bolts. Check it out for yourself http://www.ntsb.gov/events/2001/AA587/default.htm http://www.airsafe.com/events/aa587.htm http://www.airdisaster.com/cvr/aa587.shtml Let me show you a little math that should have made your decision easier. 3yrs at Colgan Air= total income of $92,700 based on upgrade time found on APC. You would be a captain at Colgan for 2 years with no jet experience. 3yrs at ExpressJet= Total income of $99,000 or $105,300 based on which aircraft you become captain in. You would be a captain for 1 year. ExpressJet would pay you an average of $2,100 or $4,200 more per year and you'd have jet experience. Why you had a job offer at Express and dropped it for Colgan is beyond me. That's if you really were offered one I only point this out because after reading your several post I've come to the conclusion that you think far less than I do, which is seriously saying something. Perhaps before just tossing out this big crazy rant or smart remark to anyone justification should be included. You say airbus sucks yet have no knowledge on them. Now think for a minute.... If CaptainMark said they suck, having flown them, I'll buy it. But I'm not going to listen to a guy who makes some seriously bad choices. I'm a Boeing fan because it's american, keeps jobs in the US, and they are proven. That being said... I'll make a $10 paypal wager we see Kilo at Go-Jets, Mesa, or something close. ************************************* these threads have been boring of late...and it doesn't matter anyway..i win! |
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 91365)
It's great how a 40 something guy got involved in a "my airplane is better than yours" debate. What a tool.
|
What I do know is the Saab 340 has never been hit by SA-7 and landed. The Airbus has; Airbus hit by SAM over Baghdad. :cool:
|
what happened here....?
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...8&tbl=ACCIDENT and here.. http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...8&tbl=ACCIDENT and here... http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...2&tbl=ACCIDENT |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands