Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Hand flying a SID...? >

Hand flying a SID...?

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Hand flying a SID...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2016, 02:14 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,176
Default

You want workload, try flying a NAT crossing, US to Germany some night.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 03:57 PM
  #22  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Default

As stated from a few others, flying a SID with or without AP is not stated specifically in the FARs, but may be viewed through company policy. However, I agree with Dreamfighter's statement about using AP to reduce workload. Although hand flying a SID may not be demanding at all; it is important to be efficient by utilizing any and all tools/info. that is accessible. It seems to me that a pilot would become more efficient by monitoring the AP as it progressed through the SID; meanwhile, the pilot could also continue his/her scan on other instruments, to make sure everything is "up to par" and in good condition.
ajcucinella is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 04:42 PM
  #23  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
You want workload, try flying a NAT crossing, US to Germany some night.

GF
Yeah, making those positions reports every 45 mins is sooo exhausting.
If you have CPDLC, I really feel bad as your typing finger might get a little sore.
Thedude is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 05:01 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,176
Default

What I missed saying was hand-flying the crossing, auto-pilot out.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 06:08 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

My company highly recommends using the autopilot at Noise sensitive airports in Europe... and in HKG. If George sets off the noise alerts.. so be it.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:05 AM
  #26  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
What I missed saying was hand-flying the crossing, auto-pilot out.

GF
So you are in the NAT with no auto-pilot.
Better not be in MNPS airspace.
Thedude is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:34 AM
  #27  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by ajcucinella View Post
As stated from a few others, flying a SID with or without AP is not stated specifically in the FARs, but may be viewed through company policy. However, I agree with Dreamfighter's statement about using AP to reduce workload. Although hand flying a SID may not be demanding at all; it is important to be efficient by utilizing any and all tools/info. that is accessible. It seems to me that a pilot would become more efficient by monitoring the AP as it progressed through the SID; meanwhile, the pilot could also continue his/her scan on other instruments, to make sure everything is "up to par" and in good condition.
Be cognizant of what the other guy's workload is when handflying. As a PIC I can always tell the FO to turn the damn AP on if his handflying is causing me to get overloaded with monitoring, doing my tasks, and most of his tasks. An FO might not be so quick to speak up.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 09:54 AM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Default

Good point rickair7777, I assume it is ultimately dependent on the PIC's decision after the influence of company standards.
ajcucinella is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 01:45 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 52
Default

Pre flight planning. But don't get locked into a mind set. Every time I am in Frankfurt I study 2 of the (16+) sids. It never fails I get one I have not tabbed or looked at. So I taxi slow. I go head down other guy taxis, then visa versa.

I am not ashamed to say: not ready. take the penalty box, or get re sequenced.
I go when I am positive I am all dialed up. I go. I have never tripped a noise sensor. ATC at JFK and EDAF have never " needed to help me" with a turn now at Canarsey etc.

My favorite is last minute changes. Lovely on a star in the weather.
cwjflyer20 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 02:19 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude View Post
So you are in the NAT with no auto-pilot.
Better not be in MNPS airspace.
I think that you are referring to RVSM airspace, not MNPS.

I have done this, back in the mists of time, and well before RVSM.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uptpilot
Technical
3
10-30-2015 02:42 PM
Std Deviation
Part 91 and Low Time
3
08-07-2012 10:22 AM
cantwin
Technical
6
04-28-2012 02:04 AM
highflyer
Aviation Law
4
06-19-2009 03:36 AM
maybeesdid
Hangar Talk
1
08-30-2007 09:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices