Search

Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States Furloughing 2009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2008 | 03:57 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: A320 gear monkey
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
I hope you will get an extra month
Probably not...unfortunately
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:29 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Everything AMR has is for sale.... didn't you know that? In their own words during a press conference when asked to quote a price for Eagle...
"you can't afford it." But yes, there is a vast difference between being employed at a regional where your paycheck comes from the same bank account as mainline, than when it comes from some regional that happens to have the flying by trying to undercut the next company....

The mainlines will have their regional feed one way or another. We can keep accepting jobs from lowlife scumbags types like (insert name here), and helping him get rich while accelerating the race to the bottom, or you can get some self respect and do what's right in the first place... when the lowlife Companies go away, the owned companies will just grow larger.

It's basically the same arguement Mainlines have been saying about regionals for decades... that we are stealing the flying... and nobody believed them.... I'm sure if you ask a few Midwest pilots, they may be able to explain the long term detramental effects of outsourcing.... be it outsourcing to replace a little plane, or a big plane....
Wow...another winning personality from Eagle. I can not begin to express my enthusiasm for my next van ride with one of you types. I have definitely met some decent Eagle guys but it seems like y'all have a disproportionate number of obnoxious d-bags. I don't get the "if you ain't wholly owned, ya ain't schnit" attitude. I really don't. You may be wholly owned but that still just makes you the ultimate B-scale employee. Good for you. For the record I work for one of the worthless undercutting scumbag non-wholly owned operators (XJT). Get off it dude.

Sorry for the thread drift, just had to vent. With all this talk of TSA furloughing, does that mean the option of combining GoJet and TSA seniority lists (as distasteful as it is) is off the table? I feel for you TSA guys getting furloughed while spineless jet-A "wannabes" are still getting hired at Gojet. Burns me up.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:35 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: A320 gear monkey
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
With all this talk of TSA furloughing, does that mean the option of combining GoJet and TSA seniority lists (as distasteful as it is) is off the table?
Doubt it. I see TSA becomming the next UFS (united feeder service. The first TSA alter ego. They just disappeared.)
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:44 PM
  #54  
CaptainCarl's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm a man of my word.
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Wow...another winning personality from Eagle. I can not begin to express my enthusiasm for my next van ride with one of you types. I have definitely met some decent Eagle guys but it seems like y'all have a disproportionate number of obnoxious d-bags. I don't get the "if you ain't wholly owned, ya ain't schnit" attitude. I really don't. You may be wholly owned but that still just makes you the ultimate B-scale employee. Good for you. For the record I work for one of the worthless undercutting scumbag non-wholly owned operators (XJT). Get off it dude.

Sorry for the thread drift, just had to vent. With all this talk of TSA furloughing, does that mean the option of combining GoJet and TSA seniority lists (as distasteful as it is) is off the table? I feel for you TSA guys getting furloughed while spineless jet-A "wannabes" are still getting hired at Gojet. Burns me up.
I'm pretty sure the subject was never on the table to begin with. However, I am definitely trying to get the idea out there. I think one list is the best thing for TSA and GoJet right now, especially with Trans Staters getting kicked out the door and GoJetters hiring nubbin's (newbies). One list will give us some power we do not currently have.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:44 PM
  #55  
exwaterski's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Wow...another winning personality from Eagle. I can not begin to express my enthusiasm for my next van ride with one of you types. I have definitely met some decent Eagle guys but it seems like y'all have a disproportionate number of obnoxious d-bags. I don't get the "if you ain't wholly owned, ya ain't schnit" attitude. I really don't. You may be wholly owned but that still just makes you the ultimate B-scale employee. Good for you. For the record I work for one of the worthless undercutting scumbag non-wholly owned operators (XJT). Get off it dude.

Sorry for the thread drift, just had to vent. With all this talk of TSA furloughing, does that mean the option of combining GoJet and TSA seniority lists (as distasteful as it is) is off the table? I feel for you TSA guys getting furloughed while spineless jet-A "wannabes" are still getting hired at Gojet. Burns me up.
Somebody who gets it.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 04:50 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
I'm pretty sure the subject was never on the table to begin with. However, I am definitely trying to get the idea out there. I think one list is the best thing for TSA and GoJet right now, especially with Trans Staters getting kicked out the door and GoJetters hiring nubbin's (newbies). One list will give us some power we do not currently have.
Thats kind of what I was thinking. But I guess by keeping you guys divided management has you right where they want you. At least with one list the furloughs on the TSA side would be absorbed by the hiring on the GoJet side. I'm sure unifying that pilot group will be an uphill battle for the ages but it may be worth looking at. I would really hate to see TSA fade into the sunset while GoJet prospers.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:04 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

It's my understanding that HoJet was started to circumvent AA (or Eagle's) scope on flying 70 seaters. Since TSA is no longer flying for AA, HoJet has no reason to exist any more, correct?


Originally Posted by Mason32
The mainlines will have their regional feed one way or another. We can keep accepting jobs from lowlife scumbags types like (insert name here), and helping him get rich while accelerating the race to the bottom, or you can get some self respect and do what's right in the first place... when the lowlife Companies go away, the owned companies will just grow larger.
I have to agree. Even as an (insert name here) pilot, what you're saying makes a lot of sense.






OO.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:11 PM
  #58  
250 or point 65's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OscarOscar
It's my understanding that HoJet was started to circumvent AA (or Eagle's) scope on flying 70 seaters. Since TSA is no longer flying for AA, HoJet has no reason to exist any more, correct?
Dude, mix in a search and don't derail a thread about displacements with this GoJet bs. You have no right to call them HoJet if you have no idea what you are talking about. Read a lot, then call them HoJet all you want.

btw, just got my displacement call today. going to dulles on jan 5th. however, heard that a guy below me on the list isnt getting displaced until the 23rd, so i'm gonna call tomorrow and see if i was given the correct information.

Time for a LOA!...
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:24 PM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65
Dude, mix in a search and don't derail a thread about displacements with this GoJet bs.
Dude check your panties...


Originally Posted by 250 or point 65
You have no right to call them HoJet if you have no idea what you are talking about. Read a lot, then call them HoJet all you want.
Really? Thanks. HoJet.







OO.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:27 PM
  #60  
CaptainCarl's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm a man of my word.
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Default

Originally Posted by OscarOscar
It's my understanding that HoJet was started to circumvent AA (or Eagle's) scope on flying 70 seaters. Since TSA is no longer flying for AA, HoJet has no reason to exist any more, correct?
Dude, regardless of any scope clause with anyone, Trans States Holdings could have created GoJet and put them on our seniority list.

That way, we would have the ability to move to the 70-seaters without violating the Eagle scope. But I'm sure if that's how it happened, Eagle guys would be p!ssed like none other and would be calling all of us "psuedo-scabs" for circumventing their scope clause.

I don't really care though because the -700's are all operated for United anyways, so it's not like they would be competing with American Beagle Boys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miker1369
Hangar Talk
1
12-21-2008 06:32 PM
Atreyu
Trans States Airlines
67
10-23-2008 07:29 PM
LOW FUEL
Trans States Airlines
33
09-29-2008 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices