Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Union Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/)
-   -   Winning (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/114721-winning.html)

oldmako 06-30-2018 05:02 PM

[QUOTE=FliesInSoup;2625231]Looks as though some pilots are wanting to recoup 2% of their wages now in favor of giving up 50% of their wages later; not to mention their QOL...[/QUOTE

Worth repeating. Frank Lorenzo would love some of these guys.

tzskipper 06-30-2018 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by APC225 (Post 2624921)
Listened to an interview with Janus. Interviewer pressed him as to why he brought suit and he kept saying that by being forced to pay dues he was forced into giving up his Constitutional freedom of association, forced into giving up his Constitutional freedom of speech. Wished the interviewer had just asked, "Who forced you to work there? Why not just leave?"

In a Cavuto interview today, a comment was made referencing the choice to take the job in the first place. Kind of morphed (as I recall) into Janus saying he was concerned about the Union's impact on the state budget (you know, livable wages, medical and retirement).

S

Dave Fitzgerald 07-01-2018 08:56 AM

Well.....union membership is optional. But the contract is a benefit. That's what agency shop is all about.

How about if you opt not to be a union member, you are no longer covered by the contract? Meaning you have to do whatever the crew desk tells you to do as long as it doesn't violate FAR's? And, since pay is directly related to union bargaining, some don't want to pay the 2% up front, how about we just take that out of the equation.

You are free to not be a member, not be covered by the contract, then paid 50% less than the union members? Fair? I think so.

GogglesPisano 07-01-2018 10:07 AM


Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald (Post 2625552)
Well.....union membership is optional. But the contract is a benefit. That's what agency shop is all about.

How about if you opt not to be a union member, you are no longer covered by the contract? Meaning you have to do whatever the crew desk tells you to do as long as it doesn't violate FAR's? And, since pay is directly related to union bargaining, some don't want to pay the 2% up front, how about we just take that out of the equation.

You are free to not be a member, not be covered by the contract, then paid 50% less than the union members? Fair? I think so.

The problem is, guess who the airline will hire exclusively going forward: Union or nonunion?

In 15 years after the last union pilot retires, the Republican/Chamber of Commerce wet dream will have come true. An airline of non-union rugged-individualists like Slaphappy begging for scraps — all in the name of “freedom.”

BKbigfish 07-01-2018 11:22 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2625589)
The problem is, guess who the airline will hire exclusively going forward: Union or nonunion?

In 15 years after the last union pilot retires, the Republican/Chamber of Commerce wet dream will have come true. An airline of non-union rugged-individualists like Slaphappy begging for scraps — all in the name of “freedom.”

This^^^

Also I would expect management to pay the non-union members the same or maybe even a bit more initially to drive the wedge in even further and fuel the theory that the union is unecessry and potentially holding people back from reaping the benefits of “free market forces.” Then once the union is off property they’ll pull the rug out. Work rules and generous benefits packages will be out the window and pay will fluctuate wildly depending on “market forces” and how much company kool aide you are willing to injest. Another casualty of this little experiment in libertarianism would most likely be safety as the most lucrative contracts and career advancement would go to the guys that “get the job done.” Oh you’re too tired to agree to an FDP extension? You’re not captain material.

Octaflugaron 07-08-2018 04:41 PM

Line Pilots Pull Weight, not the union.
 

Originally Posted by guppie (Post 2624948)
Membership is always optional. You don't have to join the union. You just have to pay your fair share (association fee) of it's cost. After all, Duty of Fair Representation is the law. It states that if your job is covered by a CBA, you will receive the same hard fought pay and bennies as members...even as a nonmember. 'Right to Work' just allows you to be a nonmember AND a freeloader. 'Bankrupt the Unions' is what the legislation should be called. Once the union is gone, we can all fly heavies for Skywest, dba UA,DL, and AA. It'll be swell.


Right to Work does not make you a freeloader. It gives the worker the right NOT to pay homage to a union with which he or she disagrees. Compulsory union membership or compulsory dues is unconstitutional. That is what I was referring to when I said, "make union membership optional." This has been well established. Workers aren't freeloaders. The money they pay to unions is not their leverage. The work they do on the shop floor (cockpits for us airline types) is their leverage. Without this work, union bosses would have zilch. BTW, what percentage of your dues goes to the national union? Want a union that REALLY works for pilots? Elect a union that ONLY represents your work group. Make it so that 100% of your dues goes to your pilots and your contract negotiations, etc.

Octaflugaron 07-08-2018 04:44 PM


Originally Posted by BKbigfish (Post 2625622)
This^^^

Also I would expect management to pay the non-union members the same or maybe even a bit more initially to drive the wedge in even further and fuel the theory that the union is unecessry and potentially holding people back from reaping the benefits of “free market forces.” Then once the union is off property they’ll pull the rug out. Work rules and generous benefits packages will be out the window and pay will fluctuate wildly depending on “market forces” and how much company kool aide you are willing to injest. Another casualty of this little experiment in libertarianism would most likely be safety as the most lucrative contracts and career advancement would go to the guys that “get the job done.” Oh you’re too tired to agree to an FDP extension? You’re not captain material.

Absurd....

Whiskey4 07-08-2018 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2625589)
The problem is, guess who the airline will hire exclusively going forward: Union or nonunion?

In 15 years after the last union pilot retires, the Republican/Chamber of Commerce wet dream will have come true. An airline of non-union rugged-individualists like Slaphappy begging for scraps — all in the name of “freedom.”

No need to be for scraps...we’ll just unionize!!! ;D

GogglesPisano 07-08-2018 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by Octaflugaron (Post 2630552)
Right to Work does not make you a freeloader. It gives the worker the right NOT to pay homage to a union with which he or she disagrees. Compulsory union membership or compulsory dues is unconstitutional. That is what I was referring to when I said, "make union membership optional." This has been well established. Workers aren't freeloaders. The money they pay to unions is not their leverage. The work they do on the shop floor (cockpits for us airline types) is their leverage. Without this work, union bosses would have zilch. BTW, what percentage of your dues goes to the national union? Want a union that REALLY works for pilots? Elect a union that ONLY represents your work group. Make it so that 100% of your dues goes to your pilots and your contract negotiations, etc.

Riddle me this: why can’t the pilots that are so against the idea of collective bargaining simply find employment at a non-union carrier? Or in corporate aviation? Then everyone is happy, no?

Octaflugaron 07-08-2018 08:39 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2630577)
Riddle me this: why can’t the pilots that are so against the idea of collective bargaining simply find employment at a non-union carrier? Or in corporate aviation? Then everyone is happy, no?

No. Pilots (any workers) should be able to work wherever they wish. This is America. And they should be able to do so without the requirement to pay money to a union. Some industries are set up where workers can't even apply without first paying money to a union or joining before they are employed with a company. That is clearly wrong and it is changing fast.

Independent, nonunion professional educator groups have been established in many states. These groups are providing teachers and student teachers with benefits comparable to those of the NEA and AFT, at lower dues. Many do not support any political agenda or ideas which do not directly affect education. They may also provide liability insurance protection for members, which is comparable to that offered by the NEA and AFT. The same arrangement could very easily work in the airline pilot profession.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands