Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Union Talk
ALPA, please STOP helping me....PLEASE >

ALPA, please STOP helping me....PLEASE

Search
Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.

ALPA, please STOP helping me....PLEASE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:28 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 123
Thumbs down ALPA, please STOP helping me....PLEASE

ALPA, you supported Age 65, and now you are in cahoots with the ATA and RAA to water down increased experience requirements? A national level movement that would have the affect of increasing pay and working conditions for airline pilots from 1 side of this country to the other, and you want to dumb it down? WHAT?

STOP HELPING ME.

You are doing real damage to our careers. Stop, just stop.

CAPA, now.
floydbird is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:35 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Captbimmer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: B1900/R, CRJ/L, E190/R
Posts: 70
Default

Just another useless political organization
Captbimmer is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 08:25 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 693
Default

True, but Alpa is right 2 3/8% of the time.
clipperskipper is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Default

ALPA is supporting lowering the requirements (1500hrs)? Facts? If true, we need to dismantle the pig ASAP.
freightguy is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:21 AM
  #5  
Rollin'
 
MatchPoint's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: AA Airbus
Posts: 829
Default

Or ALPA sees this as inevitable and not being part of the negotiations could hurt our futures further. Example; ATA/RAA/etc want 500 hrs but we end up with 800 hrs thanks impart to ALPA's participation. Yes I want the full 1500 hrs but the fact is congress left this loophole wide open allowing certain programs to gain approval for lower ATP mins.

Serious question, where’s CAPA? They should be sitting beside ALPA on our behalf instead they are doing? I believe it’s in our best interest to have both ALPA and CAPA working together on national issues.
MatchPoint is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:51 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

So in effect, the only thing poised to change is the amount of debt a regional new hire will be saddled with. Assuming they can get loans anymore....
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:07 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint View Post
Or ALPA sees this as inevitable and not being part of the negotiations could hurt our futures further. Example; ATA/RAA/etc want 500 hrs but we end up with 800 hrs thanks impart to ALPA's participation. Yes I want the full 1500 hrs but the fact is congress left this loophole wide open allowing certain programs to gain approval for lower ATP mins.
Thats the same argument that was made for Age 65. "Its going to happen anyways, we might as well be a part of it". Look how well that worked out for us, age 65 still passed and its screwing all of us every single day. And by the looks of it, a lot more pilots are staying past 65 than originally expected.

Are we going to have a lot more pilots going to airlines at 500TT than originally expected?

This country needs skilled competent EXPERIENCED pilots in airline seats. We as pilots need barriers to entry to this profession to drive the wages up. There is no reason why becoming an airline pilot should be any easier, quicker, or less compensating than becoming a doctor or lawyer.

In the end there will be less new pilots. That will drive up wages. It'll put sleazebag operators out of business as they won't be able to find pilots. And best of all, it could make it so that (due to the need to match the number of jobs to the number of pilots) its more effective to fly a 737 instead of 2 RJs. This could help us fix scope.


Not many will buy 1500 hours. It just isn't possible for the majority of the population and I don't think it'll be a concern. What it will do is make it so the pilots that are the most goal oriented, driven, dedicated, and capable, are the ones that make it to the airlines. Heck, aside from 2006-2009, you needed 1500 hours to make it to the airlines anyways.


1500 hours required for pilots is good for the safety of the public and its good for our careers. Those should be the 2 things that ALPA is worried about and ALPA should be pushing hard for this, not once again giving in.
lolwut is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:34 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint View Post
Serious question, where’s CAPA? They should be sitting beside ALPA on our behalf instead they are doing? I believe it’s in our best interest to have both ALPA and CAPA working together on national issues.
"The two pilot organizations on the panel were divided on the issue. The Air Line Pilots Association, whose members include pilots at both regional and major airlines, backed the recommendations. But the Coalition of Airline Pilot Associations, whose members include pilot unions at major airlines and cargo carriers, dissented, saying that even enhanced training isn't a substitute for experience."


CAPA, now.
floydbird is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 04:28 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

It's pretty clear.

ALPA wants more members. CAPA wants more pilots.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 04:52 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint View Post
Or ALPA sees this as inevitable and not being part of the negotiations could hurt our futures further. Example; ATA/RAA/etc want 500 hrs but we end up with 800 hrs thanks impart to ALPA's participation. Yes I want the full 1500 hrs but the fact is congress left this loophole wide open allowing certain programs to gain approval for lower ATP mins.

Serious question, where’s CAPA? They should be sitting beside ALPA on our behalf instead they are doing? I believe it’s in our best interest to have both ALPA and CAPA working together on national issues.
Serious answer...CAPA, IBT, SWAPA, APA and USAPA have all been out front on this since the beginning and not budged one bit on the 1500 hour requirement. ALPA came along kicking and screaming when they were the lone holdout among pilot groups...something I pointed out weeks ago and someone here called me a liar.

The facts are as they were then. ALPA is in bed with AABI, ATA and RAA. ATA, RAA and NBAA want relaxed rules. ATA and RAA for cheaper labor, AABI so that the university programs they front for can still convince mommy and daddy to pay for juniors college flying by saying that a 4 year degree will give a free pass on 700 or so hours of flying time. Meaning more $$ for the school and new blood...and dues for ALPA.

And ALPA is supposed to sweep in and with the wisdom of Solomon, say that a 4 yr degree and 800 hours will be enough. Babbitt is already primed to say, "Yes, this is good because ALPA is behind it."

The Colgan 3407 families are LIVID about this...as you might imagine. As are a few Congressmen and Senators.

It used to be we all spoke about the FAA regulating by the number of dead bodies. Guess they aren't the only ones anymore.
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elcid79
Union Talk
17
06-01-2011 06:58 AM
ehe2
Trans States Airlines
36
06-20-2010 07:54 PM
APM145
Union Talk
0
02-15-2009 04:23 PM
WatchThis!
Major
29
07-02-2007 03:06 AM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices