![]() |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1017251)
Those "resources" have proven completely worthless for virtually all the other ALPA carriers I know of. Ask pilots from TWA and Midwest how ALPA's resources worked for them.
ALPA has in fact, become pointless for collective bargaining. They should stick to the role of a safety advocate as they offer nothing for pilots to better themselves (and even attempt to stiff their lower-end workers). With grotesquely bloated salaries, perks and bennies for the upper staff, they're nothing more then an aviation Enron. |
Originally Posted by windrider
(Post 1017003)
ALPA = Insurance??? You gotta be kiddin me...you are better off with AFLAC.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1017251)
Those "resources" have proven completely worthless for virtually all the other ALPA carriers I know of. Ask pilots from TWA and Midwest how ALPA's resources worked for them.
ALPA has in fact, become pointless for collective bargaining. They should stick to the role of a safety advocate as they offer nothing for pilots to better themselves (and even attempt to stiff their lower-end workers). With grotesquely bloated salaries, perks and bennies for the upper staff, they're nothing more then an aviation Enron. |
Originally Posted by aewanabe
(Post 1017293)
Eaglefly, ALPA got you a seat at AA without an interview. I don't have a problem with that, but it's odd for you to tell us how much we don't need ALPA when you fail to manage what it has done for you. I don't know any of us, myself included, that view ALPA as a panacea. But it's clear that management has absolutely zero intent to treat our PEAs or the PVC with any of our "integrity" value, and we need a voice in our careers.
|
Originally Posted by golfandfly
(Post 1017285)
I don't think so. I don't recall the pay raise... Were you working there when they decided to let the pilots know of the agreement changes and pay rates for the EMB 190? I think it was 2004 or so?
2nd, if I'm not mistaken, B6 pilots had the OPTION of changing to a new agreement June 8, 2011 which included a pay bump, or they could stay under the then current agreement. BTW, that pay bump is RETROACTIVE to Jan 1. Retro is not even in the ALPA dictionary. |
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017299)
1st, I don't work for JetBlue, I work under the despotic tyranny of ALPA.
2nd, if I'm not mistaken, B6 pilots had the OPTION of changing to a new agreement June 8, 2011 which included a pay bump, or they could stay under the then current agreement. BTW, that pay bump is RETROACTIVE to Jan 1. Retro is not even in the ALPA dictionary. |
That massive pay raise is 1.09 percent. At my current rate, including retro, I will receive about 300 dollars after tax. Also, the retro back to January ignores the fact that this raise was supposed to be effective in 2010.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1017300)
Really? Then why have ALPA pilot groups received RETRO paychecks before?
Not in recent history, back in the golden age, yes. |
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017303)
Not in recent history, back in the golden age, yes.
|
Originally Posted by aewanabe
(Post 1017302)
That massive pay raise is 1.09 percent. At my current rate, including retro, I will receive about 300 dollars after tax. Also, the retro back to January ignores the fact that this raise was supposed to be effective in 2010.
|
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017308)
Still better than going backward. ALPA lost ground during the NK strike, captains came out with a lower pay scale then the last best offer pre-strike. ALPA put us on display, and when the cameras left, the truth came out. Heck, we were back to work for an entire month before even bullet points of the changes were released.
|
Originally Posted by golfandfly
(Post 1017310)
Please tell me how ALPA screwed you at Spirit? There is such a thing as reasonable expectations. What were your expectations and how did they fail you?
ONCE AGAIN, we went backward. They don't print that in the ALPA propaganda manual we pay to have distributed monthly, but it happened. |
the dues for ALPA are 1.95% not 1.97%.
|
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017312)
ONCE AGAIN, we went backward. They don't print that in the ALPA propaganda manual we pay to have distributed monthly, but it happened.
|
Originally Posted by IADBLRJ41
(Post 1017316)
the dues for ALPA are 1.95% not 1.97%.
|
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017312)
ONCE AGAIN, we went backward. They don't print that in the ALPA propaganda manual we pay to have distributed monthly, but it happened.
If you are expecting 300/hour you are probably working at the wrong company. |
Originally Posted by golfandfly
(Post 1017394)
So now ALPA takes sole responsibility? Not the pilot group? The company's finances?
If you are expecting 300/hour you are probably working at the wrong company. Nope, The MEC mantra for the last two years of bargaining was PAY PARITY. Middle of the peer group. We fell far short of that. |
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
(Post 1017396)
Nope, The MEC mantra for the last two years of bargaining was PAY PARITY. Middle of the peer group. We fell far short of that.
Who were you trying to match? Did your company have a similar or better financial position? So are you telling me you would do better with an in-house union or none at all? Do 500 pilots have the cash to do this on its own? Management was after serious concessions, did you give in to them? |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1017347)
So you received pay raises, but you went backwards? Why? Because you lost some premium pay? You shouldn't have to rely on premium pay for your income. Personally, I hate extra flying. I want as much $$$ for as little work possible.
|
Originally Posted by golfandfly
(Post 1017399)
OK, is this now ALPA national's fault, your own MEC, or your pilot group?
All Three. ALPA National applies pressure to the MEC: - They have to work with the NMB in the future, so they couldn't tell the flight attendant that brokered the deal to pound sand. - No where in the 6-8 page back-to-work agreement did the "high powered" ALPA attorney put in place a contingency as to what would happen IF the membership did not ratify the TA. MEC applies pressure to the pilot group: -"We are in no-mans land if we don't ratify" (should have been fixed above) aka SCARE TACTICS - MASSIVE SALES JOB on the TA- including misrepresenting other airlines' retirement plans to make NK's look ok in comparison. Pilot Group: - Some scared out of their minds - Some had no confidence in the MEC - Unfortunately many were apathetic - A couple (inhabitants of this forum) actually liked it |
Originally Posted by Clear Right
(Post 1017406)
This is exactly the Mentality that is ruining this profession and this country, people want to get paid big bucks for doing as little as possible. How about being a productive member of society and your company. Featherbedding is ruining the profession in my opinion. Southwest pilots lead the industry because they are productive, not because they featherbed. Just my opinion.
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1016941)
Don't forget that just recently AirTran voted ALPA IN, the guys at FDX voted ALPA IN, both had independent unions and BOTH groups have fared MUCH better with ALPA rather than being on their own. APA has hired the ALPA law firm to help negotiate a new deal.
DAL has about 2500 guys out of 12300 who are unhappy with ALPA. That will NOT get ALPA off property. SWA has NEVER established a new bar. They were compensated 20-30% less than other major airline pilots since their inception. They are at the top right now because others fell back, not because they have "outperformed" ALPA as an independent bargaining agent. do you have historic w-2 comparisons to prove this or are you repeating what you've been told? |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1016941)
Don't forget that just recently AirTran voted ALPA IN, the guys at FDX voted ALPA IN, both had independent unions and BOTH groups have fared MUCH better with ALPA rather than being on their own. APA has hired the ALPA law firm to help negotiate a new deal.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1016941)
DAL has about 2500 guys out of 12300 who are unhappy with ALPA.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1016941)
That will NOT get ALPA off property.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1016941)
SWA has NEVER established a new bar. They were compensated 20-30% less than other major airline pilots since their inception. They are at the top right now because others fell back, not because they have "outperformed" ALPA as an independent bargaining agent.
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1017537)
http://www.x-entertainment.com/pics/kool1.jpg
So how did they get to an average of over $230K for a Captain? That's MORE than our MD-88/90 Captains were making with C2K. I'm not aware of the SWA pilots getting any big pay increases since then. How did they get there? But to answer your question. SWA has remained profitable and an even bigger point is they didn't file Bankruptcy and void contracts with the Bankruptcy Judge, The have never had an A plan (Which all the ALPA legacies had prior to the Bankruptcies of post 9/11) and only have a 401K match, albeit a decent match. SWA just like FedEx trailed the legacies until the great devastation that followed 9-11. It was only after FedEx voted ALPA back (for the 2nd time) that we were able to actually negotiate a contract. Our 1st contract under the FPA was basically imposed after our In house Union imploded on itself. Not picking on the SWA pilots by any stretch. SWA is clearly a top choice for a Pilot Job. It is just that they, like FedEx, never really raised the bar, we just haven't let it slip. A profitable company with consistent performance is one Big reason. Having a Union is another. Happy 4th Everybody. Be safe out there! |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1017532)
Shiz;
do you have historic w-2 comparisons to prove this or are you repeating what you've been told? |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1017537)
So how did they get to an average of over $230K for a Captain? That's MORE than our MD-88/90 Captains were making with C2K! I'm not aware of the SWA pilots getting any big pay increases since then. How did they get there?
They were able to avoid sliding backwards because their airline didn't go into bankrputcy. It's a happy circumstance for all of us that SWA has been able to hold on. We'll have a nice reference point. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1017547)
If you're making a W-2 argument, was Delta Express a "C" scale? I seemed to remember a lot of those very junior Captains really cleaning up with the efficiency of that operation and prudent use of our contract.;)
"Prudent" is an interesting choice of words for how Express made bank. Are you somehow trying to imply that SWA has an organized sickout/greenslip gig going? Because I'm not buying that. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1017251)
..........ALPA has in fact, become pointless for collective bargaining. They should stick to the role of a safety advocate as they offer nothing for pilots to better themselves (and even attempt to stiff their lower-end workers). With grotesquely bloated salaries, perks and bennies for the upper staff, they're nothing more then an aviation Enron.
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1017557)
"Prudent" is an interesting choice of words for how Express made bank. Are you somehow trying to imply that SWA has an organized sickout/greenslip gig going? Because I'm not buying that.
I note that you didn't answer the question. Is it W-2 or wage rates? B-scale or not? |
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1017549)
They patterned off the rates that were established at UAL & DAL in 2000-2001.
Of course, that's really not all that important now. What IS important is that their average Captain makes over $230K/year and their average First Officer makes over $140K/year. When you compare a Delta MD-88/90 Captain averaging 75 hours per month on our current pay rates, you get an $83,000 per year deficit compared to an SWA Captain doing essentially the same kind of flying. For those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon... that's HUGE! |
SWA Captain
w-2 2010 $317,000 Total days at work 142 All training and DH included Not check airman, just working the system. Yes average captain makes 230,000 Reserve pays 215,000 for a captain picking up nada(nothing) One other correction, when SWAPA started it started with no funds from the company, all the pilots were volunteers and not paid a dime for their time. The president donated the his house for meetings and stationary. |
I agree with your points about the DAL pilots needing a big pay raise. FWIW, a quick google search of these keywords "Southwest Pilots contract 2001" returned this old headline. It doesn't precisely answer your question but I think it does show SWAPA was using ALPA negotiated rates as justification for their pay demands:
July 04, 2002|By NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE Disagreement over pay remains unresolved. The union, the Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association, argued that pilots at Delta Air Lines, for example, earned about $244 an hour flying Boeing 737 jets, which make up Southwest's entire fleet. A Southwest pilot, the union said, earns about $140 an hour. Pay parity was the key platform plank for the current group of union leaders, who were elected in 2000 on a pledge to win significant raises. With elections again scheduled in September, the pilots' union sought to resume contract talks this spring, but in a much different competitive atmosphere. Though Southwest was profitable in 2001 and is likely to remain so, Cordle estimates that Southwest's revenue will decline 12 percent this year. Over the past 20 years, the airline's revenue has increased an average 14 percent annually. In his latest offer to the union, Parker proposed an extension of the current contract by two years, through 2006, and raises totaling 35 percent over the next four years. But that deal did not bring the union close to the levels at other airlines. After a 27-hour meeting last month, the union's board deadlocked on recommending the offer to the pilots. "As a matter of principle, I think we can do better," said Jonathan Weaks, president of Southwest's pilots union. The union leaders said they nonetheless sent the offer to the members for a vote because they thought that the pilots should have a chance to express their opinions directly. Weaks said he favored a complete overhaul of the contract. Analysts say Parker can afford to pay Southwest's pilots the same rates as at other airlines, given the carrier's financial strength and labor productivity. Southwest pilots, for example, fly an average of 80 to 90 hours a month, compared with about 50 hours a month at other major airlines. Southwest also can turn planes around more quickly than its competitors, and its maintenance costs are lower because it focuses on just one type of aircraft. Its low fares attract budget-conscious fliers. Southwest wants to do everything it can to protect that advantage, said Cordle. Union officials, he maintained, are accustomed to the company's history of friendly relationships and to the idea that employees' compensation is tied to the company's financial success and will not press Southwest for the last penny. Southwest pilots' vote on contract begins - Page 2 - Baltimore Sun |
Originally Posted by windrider
(Post 1017039)
over and out...i've said all i want to say about it. guess we'll see what the majority wants and if that's what they want then i would love to be proved wrong on my positions.
JJ |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1017347)
So you received pay raises, but you went backwards? Why? Because you lost some premium pay? You shouldn't have to rely on premium pay for your income. Personally, I hate extra flying. I want as much $$$ for as little work possible.
There's no shortage of guys at B6 trying to pick up extra flying to make up for the shortfall in their compensation. They are like lab rats hitting the feeder bar for food pellets unaware that they've been had. JJ |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1017286)
TWA & Midwest are hardly all the other ALPA carriers. ;)
Actually, if you want a better example of ALPA's hideous faliure across the board, one only need to look at the RJ which single-handedly destroyed the profession. From its inception where it should have been controlled to its expansion where it should have been included, they not ony botched that from stem to stern, but aggrivate that faliure consistantly even now. Those clowns could f&%# up a cup of coffee. |
Originally Posted by golfandfly
(Post 1017283)
TWA was a failing carrier and merged with a non ALPA carrier. Not sure they could do much for them. NWA had a better merger with Delta. They are never perfect, ask anyone and they'll probably tell you that they got screwed. But, in reality, it was as about as good as you can get.
Sorry I don't know what ALPA was supposed to do for Midwest. Would an independent union have helped? Would you rather pay low end workers 100K/year? Aren't they supposed to keep salaries (that we all pay) in check? Again, I am no huge fan of ALPA. I do see them as the best alternative. Working for an airline and having ALPA on the property is like living on a block with two bullies. One jacks you up everyday and the other promises to be there to protect you for a portion of your lunch money, but rarely seem to be around when you need them most and in time you'll learn this. It's just a suggestion, but I think a toasted almond or bomb pop isn't the best choice for you. Ask the guy in the musical truck for a dreamsicle...........I think you'll find it more to your liking. ;) |
Originally Posted by aewanabe
(Post 1017293)
Eaglefly, ALPA got you a seat at AA without an interview. I don't have a problem with that, but it's odd for you to tell us how much we don't need ALPA when you fail to manage what it has done for you. I don't know any of us, myself included, that view ALPA as a panacea. But it's clear that management has absolutely zero intent to treat our PEAs or the PVC with any of our "integrity" value, and we need a voice in our careers.
A 16-year contract that the fat guy from national (food stained tie and all) held over his head and proclaimed the best thing since sliced bread and a series of amendment rounds that slowly gave back many of the palatable parts of the CBA was what ALPA "managed to do for me"..........oh, that and a $32,000 magazine subscription and an occasional reminder to pay or face termination when they botched my dues payment. Believe what you wish. If another group of suckers falls down the same hole as so many of us have who have the bumps and bruises to prove it want to experience it for themselves, I say go for it. You'll never be allowed to strike though as ALPA can't give you that (just like all the other ALPA carriers who've been in negotiations for years and wont be released to self-help). The actual ability to strike is the only thing that gets true results and ALPA has no juice anymore and is simply now a dues collection business attempting to support itself as its primary priority. The difficult part is making it LOOK like they're actually doing something for you. Thankfully, I'm done with that forever, but I can still watch with amusement from the sidelines as the frustration of others who actually WANT to experience this for themselves when they don't get what they thought they would. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1017665)
... You'll never be allowed to strike though as ALPA can't give you that (just like all the other ALPA carriers who've been in negotiations for years and wont be released to self-help). The actual ability to strike is the only thing that gets true results and ALPA has no juice anymore and is simply now a dues collection business attempting to support itself as its primary priority.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1017560)
Are you implying the Delta Express had an organized sickout campaign going on? Because the data doesn't support that. Yes, they used greenslips, just like SWA uses overtime to get to their "average" pay.
I note that you didn't answer the question. Is it W-2 or wage rates? B-scale or not? Honestly slow, I wasnt avoiding your question, I just didnt take it as a real question. Wage rates combined with work rule determine contract value. Seniority on equipment determines the individuals ability to exercise the work rules to maximize his income or quality of life choice. Mean w-2 is a useful comparison metric. It takes into account broad behavior patterns based upon work rules. I dont know what you mean by B scale or not. If you mean was express a b scale, I would say it was a c scale with different work rules that was bid in seniority order. This answer isnt meant to avert your question, but it is my viewpoint that every system seeks equilibrium. If we had C-172s that paid $400/hour and 747-400s that paid $100/hour, I think the cessna would generally go senior to the 747. |
Originally Posted by 73sw
(Post 1017572)
SWA Captain
w-2 2010 $317,000 Total days at work 142 All training and DH included Not check airman, just working the system. Yes average captain makes 230,000 Reserve pays 215,000 for a captain picking up nada(nothing) One other correction, when SWAPA started it started with no funds from the company, all the pilots were volunteers and not paid a dime for their time. The president donated the his house for meetings and stationary. IOW Sailing doesnt know what he is talking about.:eek: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands