Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Union Talk
JetBlue Union Vote; trade your CBA for 'PEA'? >

JetBlue Union Vote; trade your CBA for 'PEA'?

Search
Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.
View Poll Results: Would you give up your CBA for a 'PEA'?
Yes, I'd rather have an individual 'pilot employment agreement'
15
26.79%
No, I would stick with my CBA.
41
73.21%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

JetBlue Union Vote; trade your CBA for 'PEA'?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:40 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Oh yea, we know ALPA is just stellar at merger representation...
I think a little clarification is needed.

When you say "ALPA" is stellar, remember it is the Individual MEC that handles mergers.

The Individual Airline MEC forms a Merger Committee consisting of Pilots from that specific Airline. They are the ones who do the deal, or agree to Arbitration.
They might use ALPA National resources, Lawyers, Financial analysts etc, but it is up to the Individual Pilot group on how they proceed to success or failure.

Negotiations works the same way. ALPA National doesn't negotiate contracts.
The Individual MEC Negotiating Committee Does. ALPA National provides assistance. Again, Lawyers, Financial Analysts, ERISA experts. Again it is up to the individual Pilot group to succeed or fail.

ALPA National doesn't Ratify or Reject contracts. The individual Pilot group does. The ALPA President does sign a newly ratified Contract, along with the Local MEC Chairman and Negotiating Committee Chairman.

So what you should really say is The XYZ MEC is stellar (or not)

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 07-27-2011 at 11:51 AM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 06:48 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
I think a little clarification is needed.

When you say "ALPA" is stellar, remember it is the Individual MEC that handles mergers.

The Individual Airline MEC forms a Merger Committee consisting of Pilots from that specific Airline. They are the ones who do the deal, or agree to Arbitration.
They might use ALPA National resources, Lawyers, Financial analysts etc, but it is up to the Individual Pilot group on how they proceed to success or failure.

Negotiations works the same way. ALPA National doesn't negotiate contracts.
The Individual MEC Negotiating Committee Does. ALPA National provides assistance. Again, Lawyers, Financial Analysts, ERISA experts. Again it is up to the individual Pilot group to succeed or fail.

ALPA National doesn't Ratify or Reject contracts. The individual Pilot group does. The ALPA President does sign a newly ratified Contract, along with the Local MEC Chairman and Negotiating Committee Chairman.

So what you should really say is The XYZ MEC is stellar (or not)
^^^^^THIS THIS THIS^^^^^

This is what the ALPA haters need to get. It will be JB pilots behind the wheel. More than likely most of the same that are on or interested in PVC positions. OUR GUYS! our negotiation. We will finally have a leagal position instead of a spot at the hand out line.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 08:59 PM
  #23  
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-737 Pilot
Posts: 1,617
Lightbulb

Forget being an ALPA-hater for one minute and consider this: If B6 elects to join ALPA, then B6 is acquired or merged with another airline, they could be worse off than if they were non-affiliated. Check out how TWA pilots were not only abandoned when AA bought them, but actually harmed by ALPA during the integration process. Instead of representing TWA ALPA pilots and assisting them in getting a fair deal with seniority, they subverted the integration process and cut a secret deal with APA & AA management, in exchange for not suing and agreeing to join ALPA when it was over. Net gain= 8,400 pilots, and 13,000 overall dues-paying members. TWA pilots just won a lawsuit vs. ALPA, and will probably collect damages.

In two other instances, Alaska buying JetAmerica and TexasAir acquiring PeoplExpress, the pilot group of the acquired airline got a much better, more equitable seniority integration than if they had been unionized. I firmly believe ALPA is using scare tactics on B6 pilots, telling them if they don't join a union, they'll be 'left out in the cold' if acquired. The RLA has protections for that, and it simply isn't true.
B757200ER is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 03:07 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Fins Up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Passed out in my hammock
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER View Post
Forget being an ALPA-hater for one minute and consider this: If B6 elects to join ALPA, then B6 is acquired or merged with another airline, they could be worse off than if they were non-affiliated. Check out how TWA pilots were not only abandoned when AA bought them, but actually harmed by ALPA during the integration process. Instead of representing TWA ALPA pilots and assisting them in getting a fair deal with seniority, they subverted the integration process and cut a secret deal with APA & AA management, in exchange for not suing and agreeing to join ALPA when it was over. Net gain= 8,400 pilots, and 13,000 overall dues-paying members. TWA pilots just won a lawsuit vs. ALPA, and will probably collect damages.

In two other instances, Alaska buying JetAmerica and TexasAir acquiring PeoplExpress, the pilot group of the acquired airline got a much better, more equitable seniority integration than if they had been unionized. I firmly believe ALPA is using scare tactics on B6 pilots, telling them if they don't join a union, they'll be 'left out in the cold' if acquired. The RLA has protections for that, and it simply isn't true.
If you read our PEA and the proposed "5 documents", you would be surprised at what we are expcted to believe is any sort of career protection. A first year law student could smack 'em down pretty easily. I just don't trust this "experiment" any longer.
Fins Up is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 08:54 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER View Post
Forget being an ALPA-hater for one minute and consider this: If B6 elects to join ALPA, then B6 is acquired or merged with another airline, they could be worse off than if they were non-affiliated. Check out how TWA pilots were not only abandoned when AA bought them, but actually harmed by ALPA during the integration process. Instead of representing TWA ALPA pilots and assisting them in getting a fair deal with seniority, they subverted the integration process and cut a secret deal with APA & AA management, in exchange for not suing and agreeing to join ALPA when it was over. Net gain= 8,400 pilots, and 13,000 overall dues-paying members. TWA pilots just won a lawsuit vs. ALPA, and will probably collect damages.

In two other instances, Alaska buying JetAmerica and TexasAir acquiring PeoplExpress, the pilot group of the acquired airline got a much better, more equitable seniority integration than if they had been unionized. I firmly believe ALPA is using scare tactics on B6 pilots, telling them if they don't join a union, they'll be 'left out in the cold' if acquired. The RLA has protections for that, and it simply isn't true.
Our current PEA has no language at all that states the pilots will go with the operation. We have a "cultural understanding" that jetblue would never let us be tossed by the wayside. We also have some mystery $2million guarantee that the company will foot the bill for integration.
2000000/2300=869.5 dollars per pilot. Because we cannot dispute jointly. That is in the PEA.

We also have no leagal standing to improve any of the formentioned issues like retirment, healthcare, disability ect. The LAW will not allow us to do so.

These are not scare tactics they are the facts. Scare tactics are when the company says ALPA airlines all go bankrupt, or furlough, or cap your pay. Those are scare tactics. The RLA and Mc/Bond only protect against single carrier status.

Just like the situation with SWA and AT(now guatalupe holdings) Do you think that it's a coinsidence that there has not been a single carrier status filed? SWAPA has given the AT pilots a very simple ultimatum. Take what we're offering or be slowly disolved. Why are the AT pilots in this situation? Because they lack specific language! WE HAVE NO LANGUAGE!
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 10:46 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sennaha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: retired EMB-145 CA
Posts: 115
Default

CaptCoolhand;

I counldn't agree more.
Sennaha is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 05:41 PM
  #27  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,599
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
I think a little clarification is needed.

When you say "ALPA" is stellar, remember it is the Individual MEC that handles mergers.

The Individual Airline MEC forms a Merger Committee consisting of Pilots from that specific Airline. They are the ones who do the deal, or agree to Arbitration.
They might use ALPA National resources, Lawyers, Financial analysts etc, but it is up to the Individual Pilot group on how they proceed to success or failure.

Negotiations works the same way. ALPA National doesn't negotiate contracts.
The Individual MEC Negotiating Committee Does. ALPA National provides assistance. Again, Lawyers, Financial Analysts, ERISA experts. Again it is up to the individual Pilot group to succeed or fail.

ALPA National doesn't Ratify or Reject contracts. The individual Pilot group does. The ALPA President does sign a newly ratified Contract, along with the Local MEC Chairman and Negotiating Committee Chairman.

So what you should really say is The XYZ MEC is stellar (or not)
Did the local TWA MEC throw themselves all under the bus in the AA merger case? Those involved have said that ALPA Nat'l came in over the top and made it happen the way it did in hopes of appeasing APA (and in hopes of gaining AA pilots as ALPA members someday).

But on the other hand, I just dont have faith in the concept of a local MEC running the show. Those involved are typically senior and willing to eat their young. Yes, I know anyone can get involved with the union, but a newhire isnt going to be a MEC Chairman, and probably wont be elected LEC rep either.

I would be much more interested in ALPA if they had a standardized national contract for all ALPA carriers and equip. The wild differences between ALPA carriers flying the same equip is what scares me. I dont want to sidetrack this thread, but a NSL would be necessary as well. Pipe dreams I know...
Flyby1206 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Priority 3
Cargo
88
05-04-2010 02:57 PM
Beagle Pilot
Regional
76
03-28-2010 06:19 PM
757Driver
Major
72
11-07-2006 06:24 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-05-2006 06:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices