Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
ALASKA in base vs UNITED commuting >

ALASKA in base vs UNITED commuting

Search

Notices

ALASKA in base vs UNITED commuting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2018 | 11:06 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 1
Default

I am a huge advocate of living in base. If you absolutely have to live in the PNW, then Delta pays the best with the best variety of flying. Will they always have a presence in Seattle? Likely but who knows. United used to be huge up there. Will Alaska? Definitely. If Alaska is no longer in Seattle then Alaska has closed the doors or been bought out.

Every time I fly from SFO-SEA or vice versa I have at least one jump seater. Usually they are very senior. It's a doable commute but you are wasting so many hours of your life. I don't have the commuter mentality. I want to get in my car and drive home, which is why I moved to a base. That being said, your potential earnings commuting for UAL will hands down beat Alaska. I have friends at Alaska and morale is in the toilet there. Most newbies are leaving for the big 3 the second they get the call. I guess my advice would be to suck it up and commute for UAL. Best of luck with your decision!
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 11:08 AM
  #12  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Big Perm
ALASKA living in Seattle VS UNITED SFO based living in Seattle
This is “hypothetical” of course….I’m trying to get some input on which of these course of actions you guys and gals would suggest and why. I have about 25 years left to fly and plan on staying in Seattle.
-Both are great gigs. Most people emphasize living in base over all other aspects.
-There are about 25 flights a day between SEA and SFO.
-Currently no scope protection at Alaska.
-Wide body opportunities at UAL.
-Future mergers possible at Alaska could have an impact.
-Work rules differences?
-Upgrade time likely to be similar ~6 years?
-Proportionally, it looks like more retirements at UAL in the coming years vs more growth at Alaska (trying to go from 2900 pilots to 4000 in 3 years).
-UAL pays more but you could potentially make up for that living in base with Alaska.
I’m not trying to turn this into a ****ing match. Just looking for input between living in base with Alaska vs commuting to San Fran with UAL from Seattle. Thank you in advance.
I'd stick with Alaska... never commute.
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
Default

As a pilot you’re gonna need a boat where it’s sunny and girlfriend in a different zip code anyway. Seems like a UA commute could kill a lot birds here.
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 11:26 AM
  #14  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Ding ding!
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 12:28 PM
  #15  
Anchuskydrvr's Avatar
Lax 320 fo
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Fifi Fo
Default

I just had a UAL Jumpseater up to sea from Sfo last month who left Alaska after almost 2 years, said UAL was a better place for him than the big A.
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 12:44 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Not having to fly a guppy for 25 years, priceless.
Not commuting....more priceless.
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 12:58 PM
  #17  
ChalupaBatman's Avatar
ORD Prisoner
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Alaska has no scope. Make the smart choice. Where do you think those 100 MRJs Skywest has on order are going? I can tell you where they aren’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 02:43 PM
  #18  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

Originally Posted by Big Perm
ALASKA living in Seattle VS UNITED SFO based living in Seattle
This is “hypothetical” of course….I’m trying to get some input on which of these course of actions you guys and gals would suggest and why. I have about 25 years left to fly and plan on staying in Seattle.
-Both are great gigs. Most people emphasize living in base over all other aspects.
-There are about 25 flights a day between SEA and SFO.
-Currently no scope protection at Alaska.
-Wide body opportunities at UAL.
-Future mergers possible at Alaska could have an impact.
-Work rules differences?
-Upgrade time likely to be similar ~6 years?
-Proportionally, it looks like more retirements at UAL in the coming years vs more growth at Alaska (trying to go from 2900 pilots to 4000 in 3 years).
-UAL pays more but you could potentially make up for that living in base with Alaska.
I’m not trying to turn this into a ****ing match. Just looking for input between living in base with Alaska vs commuting to San Fran with UAL from Seattle. Thank you in advance.
I don't mean to be the jerk here . . . but you are kidding right?

UAL has announced they are growing 4-6% for the foreseeable future and targeting companies like Alaska. The industry has consolidated into 3 behemoths and further consolidation both domestically and globally is highly likely. Furthermore anyone in this industry will tell you choosing a carrier because of a "base" is a fools game because companies change, downsize, and rightsize hubs and "bases" as easily as you and I change our underwear, and that says nothing about the present value of a 30 year career at each of the carriers. The sooner you can get on a major seniority list the better. In my mind this is a ridiculous question.
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 03:01 PM
  #19  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
I don't mean to be the jerk here . . . but you are kidding right?

UAL has announced they are growing 4-6% for the foreseeable future and targeting companies like Alaska. The industry has consolidated into 3 behemoths and further consolidation both domestically and globally is highly likely. Furthermore anyone in this industry will tell you choosing a carrier because of a "base" is a fools game because companies change, downsize, and rightsize hubs and "bases" as easily as you and I change our underwear, and that says nothing about the present value of a 30 year career at each of the carriers. The sooner you can get on a major seniority list the better. In my mind this is a ridiculous question.
Come on Joe...you asked if it would be a smart move to commute to west coast to be a 756 Captain. He hasn’t exactly cornered the market on ridiculous questions. 🤡
Reply
Old 02-22-2018 | 03:39 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
Default

I don't know what your situation is at home (spouse with great job?), but if I were in your shoes, I'd do the United interview. If you get hired, suck up the short term pain and move to a base.

That's what I did. Moving was the best damn decision I made.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Big Perm
Alaska
32
07-01-2019 06:00 PM
Two-percent
Major
73
12-19-2012 05:35 PM
aileronjam
United
7
07-10-2012 09:35 PM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM
HSLD
United
19
09-20-2010 04:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices